Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
Your pathetic passive-aggressive troll attempts are quite transparent. You must not really expect a guilty verdict, and this is you lashing out.
Wow two comments in a row that had nothing to do with you and yet you respond. Actually I just responded to you of my verdict expectation.
 
Jury taking questions is a good sign for Kyle they want to get this right. Remember they are not sequestered, so who knows what happened overnigt (let’s be real) the liberal media have drug a kid through the mud when clearly the defense is in his favor. Inexcusabl, justice is Not Guilty and Kyle never has to work a day in his life
 
I never mentioned anyone by name! I said a man. I saw it. He kicked him in the head! Now twist and spew some more leftist bullshit!

You need to try to keep up.

A comment was made that every person that Rittenhouse and shot that night had previously pointed a gun at him.

That';s an absolutely false statement. Rosenbaum never had a gun. Huber never had a gun.

That's what I was referring to...
 
And a reminder to all you “vigilante“ putz can remember this you may be saved by a “vigilante“ some day. Or you may be killed by a shirtless Diaper Sniper. Either or that’s not what is on trial here, the fact of him defending himself is.
 
And a reminder to all you “vigilante“ putz can remember this you may be saved by a “vigilante“ some day. Or you may be killed by a shirtless Diaper Sniper. Either or that’s not what is on trial here, the fact of him defending himself is.
Can someone decipher this post for me?
 
When did Rosenbaum close enough to Rittenhouse to kick him in the head?

You may go...
so you didn't follow the trial huh? then leave the conversation. cause you are merely trolling if you didn't.
 
You need to try to keep up.

A comment was made that every person that Rittenhouse and shot that night had previously pointed a gun at him.

That';s an absolutely false statement. Rosenbaum never had a gun. Huber never had a gun.

That's what I was referring to...
Lather rinse repeat deny.
 
The jury has requested that they can view some drone footage that was shown only once. This could suggest that there is a lone holdout on the fence that needs affirmation. Of course, based on juries, it may not suggest that at all. But the odds are in favor of one or two holdouts to a unanimous verdict of self-defense.

The drone footage is not clear at all and is subject to interpretation or confirmation bias. The judge has to allow it because to deny it would open the case up to the possibility of a mistrial or a hung jury.
 
If he'd stayed home like a good little boy, or if he'd simply left his "cool gun" behind, he wouldn't have had to defend himself. Capische?
Had an idiot not chased a guy with a gun. Then there wouldnt be a dead idiot. Well the idiot is a scumbag so ......oh well
 
You don't have an opinion?

Why shoot those 3, and not the dozens of people he had already crossed paths with that night?
Actually I have no opinion. I havent been following the trial at all really just see a headline now and then. I think there is a 70% chance he's innocent on all charges but I'll leave the door open to a 30% he's found guilty on 1 or more counts on a lesser charge. I'm just here for when the verdicts drop.
 
15th post
Actually I have no opinion. I havent been following the trial at all really just see a headline now and then. I think there is an 70% chance he's innocent on all charges but I'll leave the door open to a 30% he's found guilty on 1 or more counts on a lesser charge. I'm just here for when the verdicts drop.

Actually I have no opinion.

so, you're only trolling this thread?
 
Back
Top Bottom