Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
The ADA claims that no one who has a gun has a right to self defense against someone without a gun.

******* LIE.

Binger needs to be disbarred.
 
The judge may grant this motion because he has reached his limit on prosecutorial misconduct.
Agreed...he was at his limit before.
This is perfect grounds for appeal...the question is whether Kyle goes free now or later.
 
It's pretty clear to me there is likely a verdict of guilty incoming.

The evidence of his innocence was clear so to not return right away with that verdict spells doom for the young man.
I sure hope you are wrong.....but fear you may be correct.
 
The ADA claims that no one who has a gun has a right to self defense against someone without a gun.

******* LIE.

Binger needs to be disbarred.
He needs more than that...
20yrs to life sounds better.
 
Then you might want to actually respond to that person's post. I wouldn't have thought that was too complicated, even for a fool like you.
I did you grotesque *****:
1637160750549.webp


I wouldn't have thought it was too complicated for you. Of course I was wrong.
 

KENOSHA, WI—Moments before reading the verdict, the twelve jurors in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse asked if the defendant would please step outside and defend the courthouse.
“We, the jury will perform our constitutional duty and declare the verdict in this case,” said one sweating juror, “But we, the jury also don’t want to die.”

“Objection, your honor, Rittenhouse does not possess an AR-15 to defend the courthouse; I have the AR-15,” said the prosecutor, swinging the weapon wildly about as onlookers nervously ducked behind benches. “Besides, protestors are heroes, people of upstanding character, and victims.”
Judge Schroeder ruled the prosecutor a doofus and allowed Rittenhouse to disarm the blubbering liar, load his weapon, and position himself defensively on the steps of the courthouse while the verdict was read.

 
I did you grotesque *****:
View attachment 565268

I wouldn't have thought it was too complicated for you. Of course I was wrong.

Let me see if I can understand the twisted chain of illogic spewing from the vacuum between your ears.

You respond to Thinker with a non sequitur. I ask you what the hell your blithering has to do with what Thinker said. You say, "Nothing, I was responding to someone else." I tell you that you should probably try responding to that person, instead of to Thinker. And then you "prove" to me that you did so . . . by posting a picture of you responding to Thinker. And you somehow think you've been brilliant and incisive and shown me up?

Even taking into account the fact that you're you, that is just pathetic. Thanks for doing my work for me and kicking your own ass.
 
Old Biblical standard...you get the punishment that you tried to inflict on the person who you knew was innocent.

I know where you were going with it, and in a pure sense this would be just.

The law does not provide for this remedy.

The real problem is Binger redefining self defense.
 
15th post
I know where you were going with it, and in a pure sense this would be just.

The law does not provide for this remedy.

The real problem is Binger redefining self defense.
There are a lot of people out there who don't believe anyone but the state can legitimately use force..... for any reason.
 
What bothers me is he is just a kid, Who lets there kid out late at night at a protest that is known to have the potential for danger with a With a fire arm? if there is no lesson for him whos the next kid out some where looking for attention with a fire arm.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom