Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[Opie]

Just wanted to share this

 

[maybelooking]

Now DRlove is disagreeing with STATED WISCONSIN LAW god is he ever STUPID.

not only stupid, but a lying, bet welching scum bag.

 

[maybelooking]

Just wanted to share this

anti gun loons should never EVER be allowed to handle a firearm.

 

[Thinker101]

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial raises some interesting observations. Rittenhouse was seventeen when he decided to intervene in a riot that was burning the small town where his father lived less than 20 miles from where he and his mother made their home. As a seventeen-year-old, it was a poor decision, and it probably would have better if he had just avoided the mayhem and stayed home. There were calls on social media for people to protect the homes and businesses under attack and Rittenhouse responded.

Unfortunately, Rittenhouse answered the call with a Smith & Wesson M&P 15, an AR-15-like rifle he legally owned despite false press reports echoing the prosecution saying the gun was illegally in his possession. For some reason no one in media bothered to check Wisconsin laws on firearms that made Rittenhouse’s gun legal for a seventeen-year-old instead just taking the word of the prosecution that was lying.

The judge threw out the charge of illegal possession of a firearm early on in what turned out to be a slew of criticism aimed at prosecutorial sloppiness and outright incompetence. It became evident as soon as video evidence was shown that the prosecution’s case was built on a house of cards, and it started falling apart almost immediately. The video clearly showed that Rittenhouse was being pursued by a mob and that he acted in self-defense.

At this writing the jury is still out likely because lynch mob influence is seen by the jury as a threat to them and their families. Incredibly, national press coverage was so poor that up until the trial started most African Americans thought Rittenhouse had used his rifle to shoot three blacks especially after Joe Biden had publicly accused the teenager of being a white supremacist. The lone black member of the jury is no doubt under tremendous pressure to vote guilty and ignore the obvious evidence that Rittenhouse discharged the rifle to save his life from imminent attacks of rioters that were out of control and out for blood.

Rittenhouse stuck his neck out when the rest of us just stood back and hoped Washington would come to its senses and put a stop to the destruction of communities under the banner of a concocted Black Lives Matter movement when no one in the country was saying black lives do not matter. Maybe Rittenhouse's actions were dumb or maybe there were what was needed.

Considering crisis after crisis it's pretty safe to say the Biden administration is absolutely useless and incompetent. Biden personally stoked the flames on Rittenhouse and the administration sits with their thumbs up their rear for each and every issue that has turned into a crisis.

 

[JWBooth]

 

[FA_Q2]

As a seventeen-year-old, it was a poor decision, and it probably would have better if he had just avoided the mayhem and stayed home.

I somewhat disagree with this in general. It is only a poor decision in the context of Rittenhouse himself. If all the founders had the same idea of what constituted a 'poor' decision there would be no US.

 

[FA_Q2]

1. The fact that this trail was not moved, AND the jury sequestered, was ******* retarded.

2. The judge needs to declare a mistrial with prejudice immediately.

3. Rittenhouse's actions were laudable. That he has been charged is a shame on our society.

While the trial being moved and the jury sequestered should have happened, a mistrial with prejudice is not really the best outcome here for Rittenhouse. He really does need a full exoneration. The public lynching will be bad enough with that, if it were dismissed with prejudice I fear that there will be an even greater amount of hate targeted at Rittenhouse.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I have a couple of problems with Rittenhouse's case:

First, if it was legal for him to own that gun, why didn't he purchase it himself?

He admitted to shooting an unarmed man.

He gave away his body armor, claiming he wouldn't need it, because he would be performing first aid.

He retained his weapon instead of giving it to someone who could've used it while he was performing first aid.

He provided first aid to no one.

He may well walk. But if he's found guilty of any of the primary or lesser charges, I can certainly see a strong argument for that.

Usually, when a verdict comes back quickly, it's because guilt or innocence is obvious. If a verdict doesn't come relatively short order, I think that could bode poorly for the the young Mr. Rittenhouse...

 

[Correll]

While the trial being moved and the jury sequestered should have happened, a mistrial with prejudice is not really the best outcome here for Rittenhouse. He really does need a full exoneration. The public lynching will be bad enough with that, if it were dismissed with prejudice I fear that there will be an even greater amount of hate targeted at Rittenhouse.

I don't trust the jury to be able to stand up to the pressure or the fear of doxxing and violence.

NOt to mention I have no faith that the jury was not stuffed with lefties.

 

[sealybobo]

I don't trust the jury to be able to stand up to the pressure or the fear of doxxing and violence.

NOt to mention I have no faith that the jury was not stuffed with lefties.

All it takes is 1 holdout to let him go free.

I wish Kyle looked like this

I'm sure everyone would feel much differently about everything that went down that night if Kyle's name instead was Mohammad.

 

[Correll]

I have a couple of problems with Rittenhouse's case:

First, if it was legal for him to own that gun, why didn't he purchase it himself?

I believe it was an attempt to comply with the legal technicalities.

He admitted to shooting an unarmed man.

So? DId you see that unarmed man? He was far larger and very aggressive and looked like he would have no problem killing Rittenhouse despite being "unarmed" as he had expressly threatened to do earlier if he caught any of them alone, AND he was reaching for Rittenhouse's weapon.

He gave away his body armor, claiming he wouldn't need it, because he would be performing first aid.

So? Obviously a mistake, considering how things went, but I don't see that, indicative of anything.

He retained his weapon instead of giving it to someone who could've used it while he was performing first aid

sO?

He provided first aid to no one.

I don't know that that is true, but regardless, his stated intent was to do so.

He may well walk. But if he's found guilty of any of the primary or lesser charges, I can certainly see a strong argument for that.

Usually, when a verdict comes back quickly, it's because guilt or innocence is obvious. If a verdict doesn't come relatively short order, I think that could bode poorly for the the young Mr. Rittenhouse...

Agreed. Any delay means that someone is not agreeing to a not guilty verdict. What should happen is a quick return of not guilty.

 

[Claudette]

Should be an interesting verdict.

 

[22lcidw]

Looking at the the events of that night, the teenager was cool under pressure. Progs can maker heroes of the evil people all they want. In the end that is what we all will be stuck with. None of the media people destroying Rittenhouse would live next door to the two dead felons and the injured one. They are pure frauds. But it plays to a percentage of the population who are fools.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

From looking at the trial, he's innocent on all charges. If the jury listened to biden or the false media narrative, he's screwed.

 

[maybelooking]

I thought we would have a verdict by lunch time yesterday.

Unfortunately, the crowd outside the courthouse may be having the desired effect.

 

[Correll]

All it takes is 1 holdout to let him go free.

I wish Kyle looked like this

View attachment 565223
I'm sure everyone would feel much differently about everything that went down that night if Kyle's name instead was Mohammad.

No, one holdout for NOT GUILTY leads to a hung jury and a retrial.



Yes, if he was brown and named Mohammad, and everything else was the same, it would really reduce the chances of him even being charged or god forbid convicted.


It would be a very good message to remind people that Muslim Americans can be good Americans instead of the lefties that the media showcases constantly.

 

[freyasman]

The idea is to scare people out of defending themselves; if you can't defend yourself from degenerates wilding in the streets or threatening your homes or property, without going to prison, then they win.
Even if you do win at trial, just being put on trial is a punishment in itself. How many of you can spend 2 months or more sitting in a jail cell, not working, and then be able to pay for a decent defense attorney? That shit's expensive, trust me, I know...


They are using the process as a punishment in order to coerce the rest of us into not defending ourselves and our communities






Stand your ground, do what's right, and never, ever let them scare you.
We outnumber them and we have them surrounded; don't listen to their propaganda and bullshit.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

1. The fact that this trail was not moved, AND the jury sequestered, was ******* retarded.

2. The judge needs to declare a mistrial with prejudice immediately.

3. Rittenhouse's actions were laudable. That he has been charged is a shame on our society.

I would sue that farting SOB for calling me a white supremacist.............lol.******* retard

Whatever happens will not stop..........................

 

[freyasman]

All it takes is 1 holdout to let him go free.

I wish Kyle looked like this

View attachment 565223
I'm sure everyone would feel much differently about everything that went down that night if Kyle's name instead was Mohammad.

I doubt it.

Most people aren't as racist as you are.

 

[Resnic]

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial raises some interesting observations. Rittenhouse was seventeen when he decided to intervene in a riot that was burning the small town where his father lived less than 20 miles from where he and his mother made their home. As a seventeen-year-old, it was a poor decision, and it probably would have better if he had just avoided the mayhem and stayed home. There were calls on social media for people to protect the homes and businesses under attack and Rittenhouse responded.

Unfortunately, Rittenhouse answered the call with a Smith & Wesson M&P 15, an AR-15-like rifle he legally owned despite false press reports echoing the prosecution saying the gun was illegally in his possession. For some reason no one in media bothered to check Wisconsin laws on firearms that made Rittenhouse’s gun legal for a seventeen-year-old instead just taking the word of the prosecution that was lying.

The judge threw out the charge of illegal possession of a firearm early on in what turned out to be a slew of criticism aimed at prosecutorial sloppiness and outright incompetence. It became evident as soon as video evidence was shown that the prosecution’s case was built on a house of cards, and it started falling apart almost immediately. The video clearly showed that Rittenhouse was being pursued by a mob and that he acted in self-defense.

At this writing the jury is still out likely because lynch mob influence is seen by the jury as a threat to them and their families. Incredibly, national press coverage was so poor that up until the trial started most African Americans thought Rittenhouse had used his rifle to shoot three blacks especially after Joe Biden had publicly accused the teenager of being a white supremacist. The lone black member of the jury is no doubt under tremendous pressure to vote guilty and ignore the obvious evidence that Rittenhouse discharged the rifle to save his life from imminent attacks of rioters that were out of control and out for blood.

Rittenhouse stuck his neck out when the rest of us just stood back and hoped Washington would come to its senses and put a stop to the destruction of communities under the banner of a concocted Black Lives Matter movement when no one in the country was saying black lives do not matter. Maybe Rittenhouse's actions were dumb or maybe they were what was needed.

Saying he should have stayed out of it is a bit short sighted. No one ever says "the rioters should have stayed home" they only say he should have stayed home.

Everyone says the kid who wanted to help and ended up having to defend himself should stay home, but no one tells the rioting pieces of shit that were the reason he was trying to help to stay home.

That's a fucked up point of view. And it's the reason rioters, arsonists and thieves run around unchecked because Americans only get upset when someone gets in their way.