Right wing militia detains 200 migrants at gun point on New Mexico!! HELL YEAH!

[Jitss617]

New Mexico militia detains migrants at gunpoint until Border Patrol arrives: report


Let’s get it going! Which one of you coward democrats want to stop us!?

200?

Feds released 168,000 illegal immigrant family members into communities

Don’t get comfortable haha

 

[Correll]

Said the man that could not cite another time that a whit supremacist rally got hundreds of attendees.


Because whtie supremacists are an insignificant fringe and you know it.



Your vile lies about Trump being racist, is just you being an asshole.

You are the one who is a vile liar. The fact is that since Trump's election, far right haters on the rise. They have committed numerous acts of violence by killing people and plotting to kill Trump's political opponents. Republicans refuse to hold Trump accountable.

You are the asshole who has his tongue so far up Trump's ass that you have blown your brains out.

One such example is Corey Stewart. He got the Republican nomination despite his ties to white supremacists. He still got 1,368,451 votes in losing. That is a huge number of people who ignored or supported him even with his ties to white supremacists.

1. THe claim that violence, at least from the right, is on the rise, is vile demagogue panic mongering.

2. Trump is not responsible for the little violence coming from the right.

3. My political support of Trump is quite reasonable, considering his policies support my interests and the nation's. You are an asshole.

4. Just review his wikapedia page. Saw no connections to white supremacists. Pointing out that "half the violence" at charlottesville was from the Left, is hardly "ties to white supremacists. Support your vile claim or apologize.

Did it ever dawn on you that you can never make your point without being the first to start name calling? Did you ever think that maybe you're projecting and it's really YOU that is an asshole? Of course you didn't. You didn't think. That's why you still support Trump after he took a giant dump on the Constitution.

If not for white supremacists, Trump would have NO support for the nutty wall idea which is the

You are not making any sense.


You complain about the effects of Third World immigration, while attacking the idea of fighting against Third World immigration.

I am fighting against proposed SOCIALIST SOLUTIONS DREAMED UP BY NEO - NAZIS.

What in the Hell is it you don't understand about that? What is it that makes you unable to realize that you are handing this country over to the third world with a strategy designed to implode?

The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World.

It's YOUR side that wants to make citizens out of them; it's YOUR side that let the precedent stand that undocumented foreigners had civil rights that trumped private property owners rights. It was YOUR side that lost the United States Supreme Court case wherein the high Court ruled that being in the United States without documentation is not a crime. Additionally Printz v. U.S. was started by conservative right wingers and the United States Supreme Court ruled in that case that state and local governments cannot be forced into enforcing federal laws.

So, we're agreed on the problem, but you think you're entitled to avoid being held accountable for the strategies of YOUR side???

Immigration = citizenship. That is how the third world is taking over and THAT is the primary disagreement we have.

1. When some asshole starts throwing around the racist or the white supremacist accusation based on nothing but shit, they are the ones being assholes, and I respond accordingly.


2. I do not want to make citizens out of them. That is just something you keep trying to assign to me, based on your odd game of 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon. My point stands. The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World, and your game of blaming me for it, is irrelevant to that.

1) You cannot change what IS. Your position has its roots in National Socialist think tanks. It is not bullshit my man, but cold hard facts. And if you ever want to grow a set of balls and go with me, I can introduce you to them as I debated and discussed these issues with them, face to face, decades ago. You persistently denying what is true makes you look like an idiot, so you resort to calling people names - names you don't call people in public... for if you did, we'd be reading about how someone fed you your teeth

2) The ONLY thing you crow about is this "legal" angle. You claim to have no problem if people come here "legally." It's a bullshit argument since it does not exist in constitutional law (as the Constitution was originally written and intended.)

If you don't understand the immigration laws, get with me in PM and I can start educating you. What you advocate ultimately ends in citizenship. THAT, sir, where your "legal" bullshit argument ultimately ends up at.

1. The idea of controlling borders is not a Nazi idea. I have never had some one call me a nazi or a racist in public the way that some are so comfortable doing here. It seems that the assholes that like to call other people such names, are the ones that behave differently face to face.


2. This thread is about illegal immigration, hence my discussion of illegal immigration. But I do not support legal Third World immigration either. Indeed, i believe that we have had too much of all forms of immigration over the last 50 years.

 

[Correll]

Said the man that could not cite another time that a whit supremacist rally got hundreds of attendees.


Because whtie supremacists are an insignificant fringe and you know it.



Your vile lies about Trump being racist, is just you being an asshole.

Okay, I'll give you your little point, but it comes at a price. If we believe the media, Trump's big rallies were virtually empty streets because the MSM said so.

I know that the white supremacists own you lock, stock and barrel. You can't get a fresh of breath of fresh air until one of them farts because you have your nose that far up their ass.

You are also a pathological liar. I've stated the fact that Trump is riding the coat-tails of neo nazis. I've NEVER said the man is a racist. He's playing racists just like you. I wonder whether it's worse being an asshole OR a complete dumb ass like you.

Here is a picture of a Trump rally with hundreds, if not thousands of supporters. It took me seconds to find.


View attachment 259634



FUnny, how different that looks from a normal white supremacist rally.

Weird how different they look. Strange how the neo nazis themselves can't get more than a few dozens, while Trump, supposedly drawing on them as a based, gets thousands...


Mmmm,

Back in the 1970s and 1980s we did not have the modern marvels you have today. So, I cannot control what the media allowed to get out of their archives and into Internet stories.

I do have some pictures taken when I was a Justice of the Peace performing a wedding ceremony at a KKK rally. There were over 450 robed klansmen at the rally, not counting their families and the couples other friends and relatives. Stop by some time and I can show it to you.

Other than that, dude, if I wanted to be the asshole you are, I could do that song and dance that the photos were photoshopped and the MSM told the truth.

IF the white supremacist were the base that gave Trump his support, they would be able to have rallies of the scale he does.


They don't. Because they can't.


They are an insignificant fringe.


Your belief on this makes no sense at all.


Racism, at least white racism, is a tiny and unimportant force in American politics today.


Why are you afraid of this good news?

Charlottesville. One and done.

White supremacists know to lay low, play it cool, and not been seen. Do you happen to know the other name for the Ku Klux Klan? The nazis do and they have adopted some of the strategies the KKK use to employ.

Rallies are pure bullshit. What counts is whether you can get your message out so people support you. Trump lost the House of Representatives. For every politician (IF one exists) that has bailed on the Democrats and switched parties, I can show you at least 5 that have switched from Republican to Democrat under Trump.

Racism, both black and white, are dominant forces on both sides. And, if watching every piece of American history get destroyed by the left is what you're after, hang with the left. They will show you the way.

Charlottesville was dishonestly advertised about being about the historical statues that a bunch of lefties wanted to take down. That is the only way that white supremacist managed to get in the hundreds of attendees, and btw hundreds is still not the scale of the thousands that Trump got daily.


And that was once and done. THey pulled it off once, and could not do it again the next year.


White supremacist know that they need to lie in order to give themselves the appearance of relevance, and to that end their allies are the people, mostly liberal, but people like you too,


who falsely smear mainstream republicans and conservatives, like Trump and/or myself, as being part of their movement.



Trumps message on Trade and Immigration, would be, in a sane world, boring.


Better trade balance and more jobs and send unwelcome people home?


Anyone that thinks that is radical or "nazi", is seriously delusional.

 

[Correll]

Yeah, so "far right" that they want to control the border, and send foreign nationals who are here against the law, home!


What radical terror!!!!


LOL!!!!!!

Legal (sic), "illegal"... WTH is the difference? If someone is here, a piece of paper issued by a corrupt government out of Washington Wonderland, District of Corruption is not going to make them anything except another subject of the NEW WORLD ORDER. As soon as that individual gets their citizenship, they will become a Democrat.

After that happens, they can tell Correll to shut his pie hole and shine their shoes. He'll do it with a smile on his face and joy in his heart... Correll just wants others to share in the Hell he's creating for himself and generations to come.

Your point about the legal vs illegal has some validity, and I would be happy to address it.


BUT, the post you hit reply to, was pointing out that lack of radical-ness in wanting to send the foreigners home.


That was the point, and you failed to address it. That was unreasonable and unfair of you.

I don't know what kind of answer you want. We've discussed this umpteen times. When the Declaration of Independence was signed, it contained the following:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Either you believe in those foundational principles or you don't. It's not multiple choice. Either man derives his Rights (especially Liberty in this case) from a Creator or he does not. Which is it? An unalienable Right is not given by government. Unalienable Rights are absolute and above the law. It is the meaning of the word, sir.

Unalienable Rights cannot apply to citizens only. The reason being, when the Declaration of Independence was signed, there were NO American Citizens. Not one, single solitary citizen signed that document. It says ALL men are created equal and ALL men have those Rights conferred upon them by a Creator.

When people come here to partake of opportunities willingly offered; to work a job; to buy and sell, I see no problem. When people like you think that means these people must become a part of the body politic, THAT is where we part company. But, right now you should focus on the Rights of man. Either you believe in Liberty or you don't. Citizenship and being part of the body politic are privileges controlled by government. For that reason, I do not agree with the assault on private property Rights your sides supports. I don't think the children of non-citizens have any "right" to a free public education. I don't support wholesale citizenship as your side does.

So, what answer, exactly are you looking for?

That is sophistic nonsense that if taken seriously, completely shit cans not only the very concern of nations, but the right of self determination of all people.


AMERICANS have the right to decide who to invite to join our community and become part of us.


This is not a denial of the rights of foreign citizens, because their right to self determination is as part of another equally sovereign group, (mostly Mexico.)


We, Americans have no inherent right to go join the Mexican nation, and they have no inherent right to come join ours.


This is a very simply concept. NOrmally at this point, liberals pretend to not understand it and play stupid games.


I expect better from you on this.

At this point I expect better from YOU on this point. How many times have we been over this now? Your lying bullshit has been debunked at least six times on this board.

Each state has the right to decide who they want within their borders. The word citizenship isn't in the Constitution. Up to 1875 the states controlled their own immigration. An illegal process took place (and I documented it for you) that infringed on states rights. What did you get in return? Ultimately affirmative action, racial quotas, preferential hiring schemes, reverse discrimination.

After having been exposed to the facts more than half a dozen times, you still don't know shit about the law, your nation's history, nor how you are complicit in turning this country into a socialist shithole.

Scott v. Sandford

If Mexifornia can invite in as many Mexicans as it wants, ie all of them, and then let them flood the rest of the country,


then this nation is over, and all your pretense of wanting to protect the Constitution, or Americans, is down the toilet.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

You are the one who is a vile liar. The fact is that since Trump's election, far right haters on the rise. They have committed numerous acts of violence by killing people and plotting to kill Trump's political opponents. Republicans refuse to hold Trump accountable.

You are the asshole who has his tongue so far up Trump's ass that you have blown your brains out.

One such example is Corey Stewart. He got the Republican nomination despite his ties to white supremacists. He still got 1,368,451 votes in losing. That is a huge number of people who ignored or supported him even with his ties to white supremacists.

Let me assure you son, I would have NO trouble calling you a neo nazi to your face. I've marched in more marches, fought in more fights, and went face to face with the best the left or the right had to offer.

1. THe claim that violence, at least from the right, is on the rise, is vile demagogue panic mongering.

2. Trump is not responsible for the little violence coming from the right.

3. My political support of Trump is quite reasonable, considering his policies support my interests and the nation's. You are an asshole.

4. Just review his wikapedia page. Saw no connections to white supremacists. Pointing out that "half the violence" at charlottesville was from the Left, is hardly "ties to white supremacists. Support your vile claim or apologize.

Did it ever dawn on you that you can never make your point without being the first to start name calling? Did you ever think that maybe you're projecting and it's really YOU that is an asshole? Of course you didn't. You didn't think. That's why you still support Trump after he took a giant dump on the Constitution.

If not for white supremacists, Trump would have NO support for the nutty wall idea which is the

I am fighting against proposed SOCIALIST SOLUTIONS DREAMED UP BY NEO - NAZIS.

What in the Hell is it you don't understand about that? What is it that makes you unable to realize that you are handing this country over to the third world with a strategy designed to implode?

The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World.

It's YOUR side that wants to make citizens out of them; it's YOUR side that let the precedent stand that undocumented foreigners had civil rights that trumped private property owners rights. It was YOUR side that lost the United States Supreme Court case wherein the high Court ruled that being in the United States without documentation is not a crime. Additionally Printz v. U.S. was started by conservative right wingers and the United States Supreme Court ruled in that case that state and local governments cannot be forced into enforcing federal laws.

So, we're agreed on the problem, but you think you're entitled to avoid being held accountable for the strategies of YOUR side???

Immigration = citizenship. That is how the third world is taking over and THAT is the primary disagreement we have.

1. When some asshole starts throwing around the racist or the white supremacist accusation based on nothing but shit, they are the ones being assholes, and I respond accordingly.


2. I do not want to make citizens out of them. That is just something you keep trying to assign to me, based on your odd game of 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon. My point stands. The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World, and your game of blaming me for it, is irrelevant to that.

1) You cannot change what IS. Your position has its roots in National Socialist think tanks. It is not bullshit my man, but cold hard facts. And if you ever want to grow a set of balls and go with me, I can introduce you to them as I debated and discussed these issues with them, face to face, decades ago. You persistently denying what is true makes you look like an idiot, so you resort to calling people names - names you don't call people in public... for if you did, we'd be reading about how someone fed you your teeth

2) The ONLY thing you crow about is this "legal" angle. You claim to have no problem if people come here "legally." It's a bullshit argument since it does not exist in constitutional law (as the Constitution was originally written and intended.)

If you don't understand the immigration laws, get with me in PM and I can start educating you. What you advocate ultimately ends in citizenship. THAT, sir, where your "legal" bullshit argument ultimately ends up at.

1. The idea of controlling borders is not a Nazi idea. I have never had some one call me a nazi or a racist in public the way that some are so comfortable doing here. It seems that the assholes that like to call other people such names, are the ones that behave differently face to face.


2. This thread is about illegal immigration, hence my discussion of illegal immigration. But I do not support legal Third World immigration either. Indeed, i believe that we have had too much of all forms of immigration over the last 50 years.

You are the one who is a vile liar. The fact is that since Trump's election, far right haters on the rise. They have committed numerous acts of violence by killing people and plotting to kill Trump's political opponents. Republicans refuse to hold Trump accountable.

You are the asshole who has his tongue so far up Trump's ass that you have blown your brains out.

One such example is Corey Stewart. He got the Republican nomination despite his ties to white supremacists. He still got 1,368,451 votes in losing. That is a huge number of people who ignored or supported him even with his ties to white supremacists.

1. THe claim that violence, at least from the right, is on the rise, is vile demagogue panic mongering.

2. Trump is not responsible for the little violence coming from the right.

3. My political support of Trump is quite reasonable, considering his policies support my interests and the nation's. You are an asshole.

4. Just review his wikapedia page. Saw no connections to white supremacists. Pointing out that "half the violence" at charlottesville was from the Left, is hardly "ties to white supremacists. Support your vile claim or apologize.

Did it ever dawn on you that you can never make your point without being the first to start name calling? Did you ever think that maybe you're projecting and it's really YOU that is an asshole? Of course you didn't. You didn't think. That's why you still support Trump after he took a giant dump on the Constitution.

If not for white supremacists, Trump would have NO support for the nutty wall idea which is the

I am fighting against proposed SOCIALIST SOLUTIONS DREAMED UP BY NEO - NAZIS.

What in the Hell is it you don't understand about that? What is it that makes you unable to realize that you are handing this country over to the third world with a strategy designed to implode?

The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World.

It's YOUR side that wants to make citizens out of them; it's YOUR side that let the precedent stand that undocumented foreigners had civil rights that trumped private property owners rights. It was YOUR side that lost the United States Supreme Court case wherein the high Court ruled that being in the United States without documentation is not a crime. Additionally Printz v. U.S. was started by conservative right wingers and the United States Supreme Court ruled in that case that state and local governments cannot be forced into enforcing federal laws.

So, we're agreed on the problem, but you think you're entitled to avoid being held accountable for the strategies of YOUR side???

Immigration = citizenship. That is how the third world is taking over and THAT is the primary disagreement we have.

1. When some asshole starts throwing around the racist or the white supremacist accusation based on nothing but shit, they are the ones being assholes, and I respond accordingly.


2. I do not want to make citizens out of them. That is just something you keep trying to assign to me, based on your odd game of 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon. My point stands. The massive immigration is handing this country over to the Third World, and your game of blaming me for it, is irrelevant to that.

1) You cannot change what IS. Your position has its roots in National Socialist think tanks. It is not bullshit my man, but cold hard facts. And if you ever want to grow a set of balls and go with me, I can introduce you to them as I debated and discussed these issues with them, face to face, decades ago. You persistently denying what is true makes you look like an idiot, so you resort to calling people names - names you don't call people in public... for if you did, we'd be reading about how someone fed you your teeth

2) The ONLY thing you crow about is this "legal" angle. You claim to have no problem if people come here "legally." It's a bullshit argument since it does not exist in constitutional law (as the Constitution was originally written and intended.)

If you don't understand the immigration laws, get with me in PM and I can start educating you. What you advocate ultimately ends in citizenship. THAT, sir, where your "legal" bullshit argument ultimately ends up at.

1. The idea of controlling borders is not a Nazi idea. I have never had some one call me a nazi or a racist in public the way that some are so comfortable doing here. It seems that the assholes that like to call other people such names, are the ones that behave differently face to face.


2. This thread is about illegal immigration, hence my discussion of illegal immigration. But I do not support legal Third World immigration either. Indeed, i believe that we have had too much of all forms of immigration over the last 50 years.

Son, let me assure you that I have marched in more marches, been in more fights, even participated in an armed stand-off at one point in defense of what I believe. I've even manned that damn border. You haven't. When the Georgia Patriot Network used to meet in the Atlanta area not only did I finance the meetings, but I attended and at each meeting, I offered the mic both before and after each meeting. There is not a swinging dick on the face of this earth that I will not meet face to face.

So that you understand that, I have appeared on radio, tv and in newspapers. I publicly debated Hosea Williams, face to face on his tv show. He lost so decisively that they did not renew his show for another season. Ike Newkirk, a former radio talk show host on WSB had me on his radio program. He remarked that I was the first white guy willing to appear on his show, alone, and discuss racial issues from a conservative viewpoint.

IF I can get someone to help me get a podcast going, I will be doing that and setting up in public venues so that if / when people have an issue with me, I won't hide like a ******* rat. I keep hinting that these matters are better served in PM. That way if someone tells me to name the time and the place, no moderator will ban us for what goes on in PM. Make no mistake, I have never backed down from a challenge and I've had the cream of the crop (even alphabet agencies) go for the jugular.

Defending the border against threats and using the military to do domestic law enforcement are worlds apart. There is a law called the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits the federal government from using federal military personnel in the enforcement of domestic policies within the United States. What you've been proposing is exactly that.

You want the military to do a job it is expressly forbidden to do. If you want a declaration of war, then lobby for one. I will not stand idly by while you and your ilk suggest illegal ways to enforce your concepts of right and wrong on the states. MAYBE if your dumb ass took a few weeks to study and research the links I leave for you, it might sink in.

Proof has been offered on this and many other threads that what you support is National Socialism. It's not a false allegation. It is FACT. It is an absolute FACT that you cannot dispute. When you advocate that the government control labor and distribution, that is the accepted definition of socialism. The FACT that the people you get your talking points from are Nazis is irrefutable. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, has webbed feet and hangs out at the pond, it's probably not an elephant.

What you want is to impose on states rights and take a giant shit on the Bill of Rights. So far you've proven too ignorant to understand that, but you're the kind of guy that could be talked into selling Drano to brush teeth with. Yeah, it will get your teeth lily white, but at a cost of poisoning your brain. Now, if you had an IQ above your shoe size, you would take heed and access the following links and spend the day reading them before you continue that line of thought. I do have the ability to PM in addition to that:

Scott v. Sandford

http://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/state-citizenship-federal-citizenship/

State Citizenship Has Roots in American History - NYTimes.com

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Okay, I'll give you your little point, but it comes at a price. If we believe the media, Trump's big rallies were virtually empty streets because the MSM said so.

I know that the white supremacists own you lock, stock and barrel. You can't get a fresh of breath of fresh air until one of them farts because you have your nose that far up their ass.

You are also a pathological liar. I've stated the fact that Trump is riding the coat-tails of neo nazis. I've NEVER said the man is a racist. He's playing racists just like you. I wonder whether it's worse being an asshole OR a complete dumb ass like you.

Here is a picture of a Trump rally with hundreds, if not thousands of supporters. It took me seconds to find.


View attachment 259634



FUnny, how different that looks from a normal white supremacist rally.

Weird how different they look. Strange how the neo nazis themselves can't get more than a few dozens, while Trump, supposedly drawing on them as a based, gets thousands...


Mmmm,

Back in the 1970s and 1980s we did not have the modern marvels you have today. So, I cannot control what the media allowed to get out of their archives and into Internet stories.

I do have some pictures taken when I was a Justice of the Peace performing a wedding ceremony at a KKK rally. There were over 450 robed klansmen at the rally, not counting their families and the couples other friends and relatives. Stop by some time and I can show it to you.

Other than that, dude, if I wanted to be the asshole you are, I could do that song and dance that the photos were photoshopped and the MSM told the truth.

IF the white supremacist were the base that gave Trump his support, they would be able to have rallies of the scale he does.


They don't. Because they can't.


They are an insignificant fringe.


Your belief on this makes no sense at all.


Racism, at least white racism, is a tiny and unimportant force in American politics today.


Why are you afraid of this good news?

Charlottesville. One and done.

White supremacists know to lay low, play it cool, and not been seen. Do you happen to know the other name for the Ku Klux Klan? The nazis do and they have adopted some of the strategies the KKK use to employ.

Rallies are pure bullshit. What counts is whether you can get your message out so people support you. Trump lost the House of Representatives. For every politician (IF one exists) that has bailed on the Democrats and switched parties, I can show you at least 5 that have switched from Republican to Democrat under Trump.

Racism, both black and white, are dominant forces on both sides. And, if watching every piece of American history get destroyed by the left is what you're after, hang with the left. They will show you the way.

Charlottesville was dishonestly advertised about being about the historical statues that a bunch of lefties wanted to take down. That is the only way that white supremacist managed to get in the hundreds of attendees, and btw hundreds is still not the scale of the thousands that Trump got daily.


And that was once and done. THey pulled it off once, and could not do it again the next year.


White supremacist know that they need to lie in order to give themselves the appearance of relevance, and to that end their allies are the people, mostly liberal, but people like you too,


who falsely smear mainstream republicans and conservatives, like Trump and/or myself, as being part of their movement.



Trumps message on Trade and Immigration, would be, in a sane world, boring.


Better trade balance and more jobs and send unwelcome people home?


Anyone that thinks that is radical or "nazi", is seriously delusional.

You are the one who is delusional. In the 1980s the mainstream media tried to marginalize the right. You don't accept that. If they failed to tell the truth, then you accept it today provided it bolsters your cause.

What is true, and more telling to me is that if an objective observer looked at what happened in places like Georgia we flipped the state and kept the Democrats out until AFTER your man got elected. If you don't want to believe that the left lied about us, tried to say nobody went to right wing events, etc. that is your prerogative, that is your God given Right. It also makes you delusional.

The difference between the media not getting away with saying Trump's inauguration and rallies did not attract very many people has been modern technology - technology we didn't have. You're delusional for believing otherwise because, unlike Trump, we kept winning and when politicians changed parties, they became Republicans. Under Trump, the politicians are becoming Democrats. So, as this stuff happens under your nose, bear in mind, a little research to see the numbers of what we were accomplishing BEFORE the media gave the wallists billions of dollars of free advertising time, WILL prove that it is YOU that is delusional.

 

[Aba Incieni]

No one has the right to take what doesn't belong to them.

No matter how many books you write.

I fully agree. That is why it pisses me off when these lying National Socialists falsely accuse foreigners of "stealing jobs." The employer owns the job; they can give it to whomever they damn well want (under the de jure / lawful / Constitution.

You see, your side cannot show us, in the Constitution, where their authority to dictate to states comes from. With respect to NATURALIZATION the federal government has limited constitutional authority:

"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization"

The federal government has no jurisdiction over states as to who may and go or even become a state citizen AND there is no provision in the Constitution to limit Liberty to citizens.

Scott v. Sandford

They take what doesn't belong to them by not paying taxes. No SS#. Thieves.

Glad you agree.

You're defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto? Really? How freaking stupid is that!!!!!!!!!!

But, just for shits and giggles, according to the Chief Actuary of the Socialist Security Administration, over 75 percent of undocumented foreigners DO pay your dumb ass Socialist Security tax. And if you had a brain in your head, you'd want to get rid of that Socialist Surveillance Number... I mean "Social Security Number" and thank ANYONE for helping end that unconstitutional theft of your labor.

If they pay SSI they're stealing a legit one, since only citizens are issued SS#s. Theives.

Glad you agree.

WRONG. Many people get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number. That is how they end up getting money back on their American born children.

There is something wrong with you for making National Socialist talking points sound like that's all you know AND then not reading a single link. Can you wallists be any more uneducated!!!!

Let's go you one better. Undocumented foreigners pay $13 BILLION DOLLARS every year into Socialist Security. They will not draw out one thin dime in retirement. When you guys start screwing with the checks of people on Socialist Security and disability - making their checks go south, they will have yet another reason to vote your side out of office.

Why in the Hell do you keep defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto?

Sorry, illegally entering the country, working under the table, using false SS#s, are all theft.

No matter how hard you stomp your foot.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Legal (sic), "illegal"... WTH is the difference? If someone is here, a piece of paper issued by a corrupt government out of Washington Wonderland, District of Corruption is not going to make them anything except another subject of the NEW WORLD ORDER. As soon as that individual gets their citizenship, they will become a Democrat.

After that happens, they can tell Correll to shut his pie hole and shine their shoes. He'll do it with a smile on his face and joy in his heart... Correll just wants others to share in the Hell he's creating for himself and generations to come.

Your point about the legal vs illegal has some validity, and I would be happy to address it.


BUT, the post you hit reply to, was pointing out that lack of radical-ness in wanting to send the foreigners home.


That was the point, and you failed to address it. That was unreasonable and unfair of you.

I don't know what kind of answer you want. We've discussed this umpteen times. When the Declaration of Independence was signed, it contained the following:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Either you believe in those foundational principles or you don't. It's not multiple choice. Either man derives his Rights (especially Liberty in this case) from a Creator or he does not. Which is it? An unalienable Right is not given by government. Unalienable Rights are absolute and above the law. It is the meaning of the word, sir.

Unalienable Rights cannot apply to citizens only. The reason being, when the Declaration of Independence was signed, there were NO American Citizens. Not one, single solitary citizen signed that document. It says ALL men are created equal and ALL men have those Rights conferred upon them by a Creator.

When people come here to partake of opportunities willingly offered; to work a job; to buy and sell, I see no problem. When people like you think that means these people must become a part of the body politic, THAT is where we part company. But, right now you should focus on the Rights of man. Either you believe in Liberty or you don't. Citizenship and being part of the body politic are privileges controlled by government. For that reason, I do not agree with the assault on private property Rights your sides supports. I don't think the children of non-citizens have any "right" to a free public education. I don't support wholesale citizenship as your side does.

So, what answer, exactly are you looking for?

That is sophistic nonsense that if taken seriously, completely shit cans not only the very concern of nations, but the right of self determination of all people.


AMERICANS have the right to decide who to invite to join our community and become part of us.


This is not a denial of the rights of foreign citizens, because their right to self determination is as part of another equally sovereign group, (mostly Mexico.)


We, Americans have no inherent right to go join the Mexican nation, and they have no inherent right to come join ours.


This is a very simply concept. NOrmally at this point, liberals pretend to not understand it and play stupid games.


I expect better from you on this.

At this point I expect better from YOU on this point. How many times have we been over this now? Your lying bullshit has been debunked at least six times on this board.

Each state has the right to decide who they want within their borders. The word citizenship isn't in the Constitution. Up to 1875 the states controlled their own immigration. An illegal process took place (and I documented it for you) that infringed on states rights. What did you get in return? Ultimately affirmative action, racial quotas, preferential hiring schemes, reverse discrimination.

After having been exposed to the facts more than half a dozen times, you still don't know shit about the law, your nation's history, nor how you are complicit in turning this country into a socialist shithole.

Scott v. Sandford

If Mexifornia can invite in as many Mexicans as it wants, ie all of them, and then let them flood the rest of the country,


then this nation is over, and all your pretense of wanting to protect the Constitution, or Americans, is down the toilet.

Had you bothered to read the links I've left for you, it would be plain to see that if you gave the states their rights back, it means more responsibility on the state.

When Trump offered Nancy Pelosi to take all the undocumented foreigners into California, she had a hissy fit. There is no way she wants them sleeping in the streets in front of her lawn. She instantly became a NIMBY.

If the states had their rights and did not make it easy on the undocumented to come there; if individual employers had the right hire whomever they wanted; if there were no free taxpayer paid educations and the feds involved in welfare, there would be NO incentive for foreigners to come to the United States. Without federal funds, the liberal states would suddenly become fiscal conservatives overnight.

I want to tell you a little secret and this stays between you and I:

All those people flooding the border are part of a big deception. Had they REALLY wanted to come here, they'd have done so under the community organizer's administration. They would not have faced resistance then. You're being played - and played by a man that was involved with Vince McMahon in an organization called World Wrestling Entertainment. You're being duped and so far you've been to stupid to ask yourself WHY and to access the many links left for you to find the answer.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

I fully agree. That is why it pisses me off when these lying National Socialists falsely accuse foreigners of "stealing jobs." The employer owns the job; they can give it to whomever they damn well want (under the de jure / lawful / Constitution.

You see, your side cannot show us, in the Constitution, where their authority to dictate to states comes from. With respect to NATURALIZATION the federal government has limited constitutional authority:

"To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization"

The federal government has no jurisdiction over states as to who may and go or even become a state citizen AND there is no provision in the Constitution to limit Liberty to citizens.

Scott v. Sandford

They take what doesn't belong to them by not paying taxes. No SS#. Thieves.

Glad you agree.

You're defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto? Really? How freaking stupid is that!!!!!!!!!!

But, just for shits and giggles, according to the Chief Actuary of the Socialist Security Administration, over 75 percent of undocumented foreigners DO pay your dumb ass Socialist Security tax. And if you had a brain in your head, you'd want to get rid of that Socialist Surveillance Number... I mean "Social Security Number" and thank ANYONE for helping end that unconstitutional theft of your labor.

If they pay SSI they're stealing a legit one, since only citizens are issued SS#s. Theives.

Glad you agree.

WRONG. Many people get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number. That is how they end up getting money back on their American born children.

There is something wrong with you for making National Socialist talking points sound like that's all you know AND then not reading a single link. Can you wallists be any more uneducated!!!!

Let's go you one better. Undocumented foreigners pay $13 BILLION DOLLARS every year into Socialist Security. They will not draw out one thin dime in retirement. When you guys start screwing with the checks of people on Socialist Security and disability - making their checks go south, they will have yet another reason to vote your side out of office.

Why in the Hell do you keep defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto?

Sorry, illegally entering the country, working under the table, using false SS#s, are all theft.

No matter how hard you stomp your foot.

I'm not stomping my feet. I'm watching desperate people squirm, as they realize they are trying to justify communism on their support of the income tax. An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number is NOT working under the table. Furthermore, the 16th Amendment was illegally ratified.

As I keep telling Correll, we almost got rid of the Socialist Surveillance Number (Social Security Number) until the National Socialists showed up and got the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify crap implemented. Had we gotten rid of the SSN and the income tax, everybody would pay a small tax and it would have been unavoidable (no big tax write offs for the rich, no child care advantages for the third worlders with half a dozen kids) But, your side didn't like that. With no federal income tax to ***** about, it began to destroy the pretext you hide behind in order to turn America into a socialist shithole. Your support of a plank out of the Communist Manifesto is duly noted.

Thank you for confirming what I've been saying.

 

[Aba Incieni]

They take what doesn't belong to them by not paying taxes. No SS#. Thieves.

Glad you agree.

You're defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto? Really? How freaking stupid is that!!!!!!!!!!

But, just for shits and giggles, according to the Chief Actuary of the Socialist Security Administration, over 75 percent of undocumented foreigners DO pay your dumb ass Socialist Security tax. And if you had a brain in your head, you'd want to get rid of that Socialist Surveillance Number... I mean "Social Security Number" and thank ANYONE for helping end that unconstitutional theft of your labor.

If they pay SSI they're stealing a legit one, since only citizens are issued SS#s. Theives.

Glad you agree.

WRONG. Many people get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number. That is how they end up getting money back on their American born children.

There is something wrong with you for making National Socialist talking points sound like that's all you know AND then not reading a single link. Can you wallists be any more uneducated!!!!

Let's go you one better. Undocumented foreigners pay $13 BILLION DOLLARS every year into Socialist Security. They will not draw out one thin dime in retirement. When you guys start screwing with the checks of people on Socialist Security and disability - making their checks go south, they will have yet another reason to vote your side out of office.

Why in the Hell do you keep defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto?

Sorry, illegally entering the country, working under the table, using false SS#s, are all theft.

No matter how hard you stomp your foot.

I'm not stomping my feet. I'm watching desperate people squirm, as they realize they are trying to justify communism on their support of the income tax. An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number is NOT working under the table. Furthermore, the 16th Amendment was illegally ratified.

As I keep telling Correll, we almost got rid of the Socialist Surveillance Number (Social Security Number) until the National Socialists showed up and got the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify crap implemented. Had we gotten rid of the SSN and the income tax, everybody would pay a small tax and it would have been unavoidable (no big tax write offs for the rich, no child care advantages for the third worlders with half a dozen kids) But, your side didn't like that. With no federal income tax to ***** about, it began to destroy the pretext you hide behind in order to turn America into a socialist shithole. Your support of a plank out of the Communist Manifesto is duly noted.

Thank you for confirming what I've been saying.

Illegal is theft. Backing thieves is no way to go through life, son.

 

[danielpalos]

Are you serious or do you want to be exposed?

Just like intellectual property Rights (like when a songwriter writes a song), the person who creates the job owns it. Jobs belong to the employer that creates it.

That is where Correll and I part company on our first issue. The definition of socialism is when the government controls labor and distribution. Then you can say that the people own the jobs. In our de jure / lawful / constitutional Republic, the employer owns the job.

I can tell you that what I build, create, or bring into existence belongs to me and I'm not giving it up to a swinging soul unless I want to. What belongs to me, individually, belongs to me.

Your turn.

Which of the unalienable right listed gives me the right to move into your living room?

Are you trying to move into my living room? Dude, for real, if you have an issue, spit it out. Do you want me to guess at what your cryptic nonsense means and then make the bullshit claim (as does Correll that you were not answered?) Is that your game?

The question is simple. Your answer seems difficult.

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Which of the unalienable right listed gives me the right to move into your living room?

Are you trying to move into my living room? Dude, for real, if you have an issue, spit it out. Do you want me to guess at what your cryptic nonsense means and then make the bullshit claim (as does Correll that you were not answered?) Is that your game?

The question is simple. Your answer seems difficult.

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

 

[danielpalos]

Are you trying to move into my living room? Dude, for real, if you have an issue, spit it out. Do you want me to guess at what your cryptic nonsense means and then make the bullshit claim (as does Correll that you were not answered?) Is that your game?

The question is simple. Your answer seems difficult.

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

 

[Aba Incieni]

The question is simple. Your answer seems difficult.

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

Those without immigration papers.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

You're defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto? Really? How freaking stupid is that!!!!!!!!!!

But, just for shits and giggles, according to the Chief Actuary of the Socialist Security Administration, over 75 percent of undocumented foreigners DO pay your dumb ass Socialist Security tax. And if you had a brain in your head, you'd want to get rid of that Socialist Surveillance Number... I mean "Social Security Number" and thank ANYONE for helping end that unconstitutional theft of your labor.

If they pay SSI they're stealing a legit one, since only citizens are issued SS#s. Theives.

Glad you agree.

WRONG. Many people get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number. That is how they end up getting money back on their American born children.

There is something wrong with you for making National Socialist talking points sound like that's all you know AND then not reading a single link. Can you wallists be any more uneducated!!!!

Let's go you one better. Undocumented foreigners pay $13 BILLION DOLLARS every year into Socialist Security. They will not draw out one thin dime in retirement. When you guys start screwing with the checks of people on Socialist Security and disability - making their checks go south, they will have yet another reason to vote your side out of office.

Why in the Hell do you keep defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto?

Sorry, illegally entering the country, working under the table, using false SS#s, are all theft.

No matter how hard you stomp your foot.

I'm not stomping my feet. I'm watching desperate people squirm, as they realize they are trying to justify communism on their support of the income tax. An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number is NOT working under the table. Furthermore, the 16th Amendment was illegally ratified.

As I keep telling Correll, we almost got rid of the Socialist Surveillance Number (Social Security Number) until the National Socialists showed up and got the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify crap implemented. Had we gotten rid of the SSN and the income tax, everybody would pay a small tax and it would have been unavoidable (no big tax write offs for the rich, no child care advantages for the third worlders with half a dozen kids) But, your side didn't like that. With no federal income tax to ***** about, it began to destroy the pretext you hide behind in order to turn America into a socialist shithole. Your support of a plank out of the Communist Manifesto is duly noted.

Thank you for confirming what I've been saying.

Illegal is theft. Backing thieves is no way to go through life, son.

Stealing the fruits of my labor via an illegally ratified Amendment which was taken from the Communist Manifesto is theft. So son, if you are backing the "law" on that point, you ARE a thief. You are also a traitor to this country.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

Those without immigration papers.

You just got schooled by a lefty. Damn if that wasn't embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you. There is NOTHING in the Constitution regarding any immigration papers. Damn son. The federal government has no authority on that issue - if you think it does, cite that section of the Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

It's obviously not that simple. The wallists have been given all the statutory law AND the case law. They have yet to understand how the precedents in case law prohibit them from doing the things they suggest.

Now you come with an idiotic analogy (be glad I'm not a screwed up dumb ass wallist yapping about logical fallacies and other such non sequitirs) and it does not follow. But, let's play house. Since I'm headed out of here for the night, I want you to think about something I said earlier. Give me your answer and I will fully answer your question consistent with what you tell me. I have to know what presupposition we're starting off with:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Now, here is court precedent on Rights:

“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)

A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.

If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?

Do you understand the concept of Liberty or shall I define it for you?

So, in plain and simple terms, tell me of YOUR understanding of unalienable Rights.

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

Those without immigration papers.

show me the immigration clause. get legal to Constitutional law, right wingers. don't be practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy but blame the less fortunate.

 

[Aba Incieni]

If they pay SSI they're stealing a legit one, since only citizens are issued SS#s. Theives.

Glad you agree.

WRONG. Many people get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number. That is how they end up getting money back on their American born children.

There is something wrong with you for making National Socialist talking points sound like that's all you know AND then not reading a single link. Can you wallists be any more uneducated!!!!

Let's go you one better. Undocumented foreigners pay $13 BILLION DOLLARS every year into Socialist Security. They will not draw out one thin dime in retirement. When you guys start screwing with the checks of people on Socialist Security and disability - making their checks go south, they will have yet another reason to vote your side out of office.

Why in the Hell do you keep defending a plank out of the Communist Manifesto?

Sorry, illegally entering the country, working under the table, using false SS#s, are all theft.

No matter how hard you stomp your foot.

I'm not stomping my feet. I'm watching desperate people squirm, as they realize they are trying to justify communism on their support of the income tax. An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number is NOT working under the table. Furthermore, the 16th Amendment was illegally ratified.

As I keep telling Correll, we almost got rid of the Socialist Surveillance Number (Social Security Number) until the National Socialists showed up and got the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify crap implemented. Had we gotten rid of the SSN and the income tax, everybody would pay a small tax and it would have been unavoidable (no big tax write offs for the rich, no child care advantages for the third worlders with half a dozen kids) But, your side didn't like that. With no federal income tax to ***** about, it began to destroy the pretext you hide behind in order to turn America into a socialist shithole. Your support of a plank out of the Communist Manifesto is duly noted.

Thank you for confirming what I've been saying.

Illegal is theft. Backing thieves is no way to go through life, son.

Stealing the fruits of my labor via an illegally ratified Amendment which was taken from the Communist Manifesto is theft. So son, if you are backing the "law" on that point, you ARE a thief. You are also a traitor to this country.

Says the payaso with papers. lol

 

[Aba Incieni]

Which of those unalienable rights allow me to move into your house.

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

Those without immigration papers.

show me the immigration clause. get legal to Constitutional law, right wingers. don't be practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy but blame the less fortunate.

They're deporting illegals by the tens of thousands. Maybe you should sue. haha

 

[danielpalos]

natural rights; defense of self and others could require the use of your house.

Not by illegals.

there is no express immigration clause; what illegals are you referring to?

Those without immigration papers.

show me the immigration clause. get legal to Constitutional law, right wingers. don't be practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy but blame the less fortunate.

They're deporting illegals by the tens of thousands. Maybe you should sue. haha

only illegals don't care about the law.