Right of Return Conference

[Phoenall]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

...and the Zionists to their's.

I am in mineas are 90% of the worlds Zionists, or don't you realise that not all Zionists are Jews and don't all come from Israel

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Just more of your RACIST JEW HATRED by using the term Zionist out of context and not as it is defined. There is no concept in International law of a right of return, if there is then the arab muslims are on land outside of Saudi arabia illegally and the original non muslim inhabitants should be given their lands back. This means that Jerusalem will be the Jewish capital and no arab muslims will be in existence. Or do you still believe that the laws don't apply to the Jews because of your RACIST JEW HATRED

And how about a link to your cut and paste ? Or are you afraid of showing that you are a RABID RACIST and that it is your words that you have added to the cut and paste to incite racial hatred and violence against the Jews.

Go into your Facbook account, type in "Right of Return Conference" and scroll down the messages, interesting reading for the most part.

Facebook is not a valid source of information as there is no control who can write comments on there.

But don't you think I haven't already done a search for your cut and paste and saw that it came from aljazeera and does not have the term Zionist in the report,

Caught out again being a RACIST POS JEW HATER

 

[MJB12741]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

...and the Zionists to their's.

So tell us, why is it that not a single Arab country will grant their Palestinians a right of return back to their indigenous homelands? Do you maybe it's because the Arab countries know the Palestinians best?

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Challenger]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

...and the Zionists to their's.

So tell us, why is it that not a single Arab country will grant their Palestinians a right of return back to their indigenous homelands? Do you maybe it's because the Arab countries know the Palestinians best?

They can't, it's not in their remit to grant a right that already exists, plus the fact that the Palestinian's indigenous homelands are occupied by Zionist European colonists.

 

[José]

I can see why Phoenall went all apeshit after reading the excerpt.

Joseph Massad's reasoning is DEVASTATING, to say the very least... an atomic bomb dropped on the underlying hypocrisy of Zionism:

"Right of return" for those who never left and forced confinement, walls, electric fences and bullets for those who unwillingly did.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Ah yes, Dr. Joseph Massad. This is an excellent presentation.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

 

[Phoenall]

Let us all join together & pray for a right of return for the Palestinians back to their native homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

...and the Zionists to their's.

So tell us, why is it that not a single Arab country will grant their Palestinians a right of return back to their indigenous homelands? Do you maybe it's because the Arab countries know the Palestinians best?

They can't, it's not in their remit to grant a right that already exists, plus the fact that the Palestinian's indigenous homelands are occupied by Zionist European colonists.

Didn't you just admit that the "Palestinians" die not arrive until well after Jews started to make the desert bloom again ~?

 

[Phoenall]

I can see why Phoenall went all apeshit after reading the excerpt.

Joseph Massad's reasoning is DEVASTATING, to say the very least... an atomic bomb dropped on the underlying hypocrisy of Zionism:

"Right of return" for those who never left and forced confinement, walls, electric fences and bullets for those who unwillingly did.

Another RABID RACIST that uses Zionist/Zionism out of context and to mean something different to what it does mean.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

On the contrary. I did watch the video.

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

(COMMENT)

This doesn't address the "right" of return; the legality of it --- as she clearly states in the very beginning. It address the "implementation." It also uses the "Palestinian" unique definition of a refugee, which is different from the definition of every other refugee in the world (past and present).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Found this, related to the above:

"In an attack on a Right of Return conference held at Boston University last weekend, one Richard Cravatts, a Boston-based Zionist propagandist, expressed his horror in The Times of Israel. Echoing standard Zionist arguments, he stated that "no population of refugees has ever presumed that the right of return - if such a right even exists - could be claimed, not only by the original refugees, but also by all of their descendants". Cravatts, like many Zionists who deny the right of the Palestinians to return, seems to have forgotten that it is European Jews, as fictional descedants of the supposed Hebrew refugees of the first century, who have "presumed" that very right in the name of which they colonised and colonise Palestine. While for Zionism Jewish "return" is the very condition of colonisation, Israel understands very well that the return of the actual Palestinian refugees and their descendants means nothing short of decolonisation and the undoing of the Zionist project. Israel's leaders are of course correct in their assessment.

It should be noted here that international law's understanding of the rights of refugees includes the rights of their descendants to return. In addition to the annual UN reassertion of the Palestinian refugees' right of return, the right of return was upheld in principle and practice after the Bosnian War. Upwards of half a million refugees and internally displaced persons returned with international assistance, following the 1995 Dayton Agreement, to their homes to areas in Bosnia (a country of three and a half million people) dominated demographically and politically by members of another ethnic community. As the Bosnian case clearly demonstates, the right of return of the refugees trumped the racially separatist policies of the local authorities who sought to continue to control the land of the diaplaced refugees and to populate it demographically with their own ethnic group at the expense of the refugees. International enforcement of the Bosnian refugees' right of return was based on the well-established right of return of refugees in international law and UN resolutions, while demographic racial separatism had no moral or legal standing whatsoever in enforcing the refugees' rights of return.

The problem for Zionism and Israel is not the right of return, as that is central to their ideology and their colonial-settler project, but rather with who is allowed to be a right-of-return-bearing subject."--Dr. Joseph Massad, from their Facebook page.

Ah yes, Dr. Joseph Massad. This is an excellent presentation.

No legal concept of right of return, it is just islamonazi propaganda. Or will they allow Jews to return to gaza and Saudi ?

 

[Moonglow]

The fallacy of conquering territory of others, wanting it back once you lost it....Stupid humans....

 

[JakeStarkey]

No "birthright Palestine" and "no right of return" exist.

They are myths.

 

[docmauser1]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Birthright Palestine, "Birthright Hungary", "Birthright Germany", "Birthright EU" ... how many "birthrights" do these arab settlers-squatters have?

 

[Moonglow]

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

Birthright Palestine, "Birthright Hungary", "Birthright Germany", "Birthright EU" ... how many "birthrights" do these arab settlers-squatters have?

They want Romania, Bulgaria, and maybe Greece back also...

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

On the contrary. I did watch the video.

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

(COMMENT)

This doesn't address the "right" of return; the legality of it --- as she clearly states in the very beginning. It address the "implementation." It also uses the "Palestinian" unique definition of a refugee, which is different from the definition of every other refugee in the world (past and present).

Most Respectfully,
R

They define refugees as those who were expelled.

Silly them.

 

[docmauser1]

P F Tinmore, et al,

On the contrary. I did watch the video.

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

(COMMENT)

This doesn't address the "right" of return; the legality of it --- as she clearly states in the very beginning. It address the "implementation." It also uses the "Palestinian" unique definition of a refugee, which is different from the definition of every other refugee in the world (past and present).

Most Respectfully,
R

They define refugees as those who were expelled.
Silly them.

But us folks aren't silly here to buy this silly obfuscation of the palistanian "refugee" def. Why would our honorable P F Tinmore want to omit that, for them, the "refugee" status continues from one generation to the next, creating an ever-expanding gang of refugeesters?

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

On the contrary. I did watch the video.

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

Discusses the legalities of the right of return. Also talks about "Birthright Palestine."

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

(COMMENT)

This doesn't address the "right" of return; the legality of it --- as she clearly states in the very beginning. It address the "implementation." It also uses the "Palestinian" unique definition of a refugee, which is different from the definition of every other refugee in the world (past and present).

Most Respectfully,
R

They define refugees as those who were expelled.
Silly them.

But us folks aren't silly here to buy this silly obfuscation of the palistanian "refugee" def. Why would our honorable P F Tinmore want to omit that, for them, the "refugee" status continues from one generation to the next, creating an ever-expanding gang of refugeesters?

It's the forever expanding Pal'istanian welfare scam.

 

[docmauser1]

P F Tinmore, et al,

On the contrary. I did watch the video.

P F Tinmore, et al,

See Posting #11 in Thread

(COMMENT)

I don't think there is any such legally enforceable "right" as the "right of return."

Most Respectfully,
R

You didn't watch the video.

(COMMENT)

This doesn't address the "right" of return; the legality of it --- as she clearly states in the very beginning. It address the "implementation." It also uses the "Palestinian" unique definition of a refugee, which is different from the definition of every other refugee in the world (past and present).

Most Respectfully,
R

They define refugees as those who were expelled.
Silly them.

But us folks aren't silly here to buy this silly obfuscation of the palistanian "refugee" def. Why would our honorable P F Tinmore want to omit that, for them, the "refugee" status continues from one generation to the next, creating an ever-expanding gang of refugeesters?

It's the forever expanding Pal'istanian welfare scam.

Indeed, and when an interest in them is waning, palistanians start intifadas.