You see? You diagnosed the problem and didn't even know it. If, as you say, Johnson can't stand up to Trump and Clinton then he is not a viable candidate and has no place in the debates.
You're kidding right? Did the point fly over your head? The base degrading nature of having 2 arrogant meglomaniacs dominating the news with their lying, and deceptions and name-calling and scandals is not the competition we want to be part of..
How did you miss that? That's not competition. That's dysfunction and crumbling political integrity.
Again, if Johnson can't wage an effective campaign against Clinton and Trump he doesn't belong in the debates.
The LP ticket is TOTALLY qualified and prepared to campaign. But on the ISSUES, not the drama and the rot that the media PREFERS to cover. In a REAL debate --- we'd kill them. Because Clinton is guilty as sin for being part of our dysfuntional WRECKING of the MidEast and Corporate welfare and Trump is nothing but a bully with very little political principle or solutions to guide him..
It's CLEARLY a choice between humility and arrogance. Between executive competency and pandering. Between NEW choices and actual log jam clearing and a further descent into the mud of cross-blaming.
Any party that is ON 50 state ballots should be in the debates. THat's a high enough bar -- believe me. Maybe you need to look at the partisan SHILLS that compose the "debate commission" for answers.
When ya want to fix all this? When it's TOO LATE? The 2 party system needs to be put in time-out to reverse this course. The message is there -- our ads are PHENOMENALLY good and positive.
But the diff is ---- we are ASKING for votes. The other 2 brand names just simply EXPECT them...