RFK Jr. Deplatformed from YouTube

[MinTrut]

Now that I know that you're completely full of shit; have a nice life.

^ Another poster talking to themselves...

 

[d0gbreath]

^ Another poster talking to themselves...

Whom are you talking to?

 

[MinTrut]

Whom are you talking to?

Clever.

 

[sparky]

I'm interested in listening to anyone or anything censored by big bro.....~S~

 

[scruffy]

If youtube doesn't want RFK Jr. on there, that's their decision to make.

Election interference.

 

[MinTrut]

I'm interested in listening to anyone or anything censored by big bro.....~S~

This can be one of the effects of censorship.

 

[d0gbreath]

Clever.

Whenever members post 'hey everyone, look at this guy'. I always get the feeling that everyone doesn't care about your gibberish. I'll go out on a limb here and say that I know that that is true.

 

[MinTrut]

Tell me more about how it's not legal, please.

This is an important issue which SCOTUS will have to weigh in on, so here's one of the earlier threads where the situation is explained:

Federal court upholds Texas social media law, clearing way for users to sue over censorship

 

[MinTrut]

Whenever members post 'hey everyone, look at this guy'. I always get the feeling that everyone doesn't care about your gibberish. I'll go out on a limb here and say that I know that that is true.

^ Talking to himself again?

And sorry to be on topic, but I've posted a link to a thread which directly addresses the issue of censorship by entities like YouTube.

Whether you can grasp the information or not...?

 

[d0gbreath]

^ Talking to himself again?

And sorry to be on topic, but I've posted a link to a thread which directly addresses the issue of censorship by entities like YouTube.

Whether you can grasp the information or not...?

So, you're pining for SCOTUS to rule that youtube must host RFK Jr, The neoNazis skinheads, and Ron DeSantis, whether they want to, or not.

You do realize that the supremes do not not have an enforcement arm, amirite?

 

[Resnic]

They keep this up all they may end up doing is creating a democrat version of trump. He doesn't strike as a guy that will just take being censored on the chin.

 

[MinTrut]

So, you're pining for SCOTUS to rule that youtube must host RFK Jr, The neoNazis skinheads, and Ron DeSantis, whether they want to, or not.

Straw man.

I'm waiting for SCOTUS to weigh in one way or another.

Then we'll see what happens.

You do realize that the supremes do not not have an enforcement arm, amirite?

Holy red herring...

 

[MinTrut]

They keep this up all they may end up doing is creating a democrat version of trump. He doesn't strike as a guy that will just take being censored on the chin.

Naw - he's too odd even for the Democrats.

 

[sealybobo]

The 2024 censorship campaign for the election begins. This sort of stuff will blow up in the democrats face.

2024 Censorship Campaign Underway: RFK Jr. Deplatformed From YouTube

Democracies are quintessentially defined as adhering to voter sovereignty. That the voter gets to determine the leadership of the country through free and fair elections is the core of democratic legitimacy. Censorship campaigns for candidates seeking political office like those that occurred in...

trendingpoliticsnews.com

Trump doing it will blow up in Republicans faces too.

 

[sparky]

this fits here.......

~S~

 

[sealybobo]

this fits here.......

View attachment 1163776
~S~

If TV shows are not allowed to criticize, investigate or mock our leaders, we aren't the USA anymore. Not the same USA anyways

The claim that "if TV shows can't criticize presidents, we are no longer the USA" reflects a foundational principle of the First Amendment, which protects criticism of government officials. Recent events, such as ABC's suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! and former President Donald Trump's comments suggesting that critical networks should lose their licenses, have led First Amendment advocates to voice serious concerns about threats to this right.

Direct violation of the 1st amendment.

Here we go Papageorgio I don't think Biden ever said something like this. He didn't mind them making fun of him. Just stop spreading lies. And Biden didn't do anything about Facebook so what happened with Biden isn't even apples to apples with this.

President Trump on Thursday suggested networks and late-night shows in particular should not be allowed to be overwhelmingly critical of him in the wake of ABC’s decision to take host Jimmy Kimmel off the air.

Will elections be free and fair with the government we have now? I doubt it. But if they are, enjoy the next Democratic President having this power. You know they will use this new tool in their tool box.

 

[sparky]

If TV shows are not allowed to criticize, investigate or mock our leaders, we aren't the USA anymore. Not the same USA anyways

The claim that "if TV shows can't criticize presidents, we are no longer the USA" reflects a foundational principle of the First Amendment, which protects criticism of government officials. Recent events, such as ABC's suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! and former President Donald Trump's comments suggesting that critical networks should lose their licenses, have led First Amendment advocates to voice serious concerns about threats to this right.

Direct violation of the 1st amendment.

Here we go Papageorgio I don't think Biden ever said something like this. He didn't mind them making fun of him. Just stop spreading lies. And Biden didn't do anything about Facebook so what happened with Biden isn't even apples to apples with this.

President Trump on Thursday suggested networks and late-night shows in particular should not be allowed to be overwhelmingly critical of him in the wake of ABC’s decision to take host Jimmy Kimmel off the air.

Will elections be free and fair with the government we have now? I doubt it. But if they are, enjoy the next Democratic President having this power. You know they will use this new tool in their tool box.

dissent is patriotism Sealy.......~S~

 

[sealybobo]

dissent is patriotism Sealy.......~S~

I do think we should do something about corporations who lie. They are destroying our society. I understand free speech but what if the bad actors figure out a way to destroy our society and it's working? Papageorgio says let it happen. Free speech is essential.

So Trump wants to silence anyone who is critical of his administration and Biden wanted to stop liars.

I think America is in trouble if it's going to be illegal to criticize the government.

The late shows last night played clips of all these Republicans including the FCC douchbag last year saying how important free speech is. Funny how they did a 180 on that suddenly.

President Donald Trump hailed Brendan Carr as a “warrior for free speech” when he tapped him as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

Again, 97 percent negative, and yet I won and easily won all seven swing states. The popular vote, won everything,” Trump told reporters.

“They’re 97 percent against; they give me only bad press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” he continued. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away.”

“Look, that’s something that should be talked about for licensing, too. When you have a network and you have evening shows, and all they do is hit Trump. That’s all they do,” the president said. “If you go back, I guess they haven’t had a conservative on in years or something somebody said. But when you go back, take a look, all they do is hit Trump.”

He continued, “They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.

Yes, they are allowed. In fact, ask Papageorgio they are even allowed to lie constantly.