Retracing Our Steps To America

[PoliticalChic]

Under that, the Constitution doesn't grant executive privilege either. That is not a right or power under article 2, nor any such statement in the Constitution.

Why do you feel it necessary to be able to kill another human being, especially now that your party has embraced infanticide, too.


"New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

And....
"Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats



"California Assembly Health Committee Passes Bill That Would Legalize Infanticide
State | Steven Ertelt | Apr 20, 2022
The California Assembly committee has passed a radical bill that legal analysts say would legalize infanticide, letting babies die up to 28 days after birth. The panel voted for the measure on an 11-3 vote.

California Assembly Health Committee Passes Bill That Would Legalize Infanticide - LifeNews.com​

The California Assembly committee has passed a radical bill that legal analysts say would legalize infanticide, letting babies die up to 28 after birth. The panel voted for the measure on an 11-3 vote. California Assembly Bill 2223, sponsored by Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, already has...
www.lifenews.com
.

The California Bill would allow mothers to kill new borns, just as Democrat Northam described:

 

[postman]

"The rules when the US was created don't matter."


You might feel differently if you were an American.

When the US was created there was legal slavery.
The 13th amendment (making us a more perfect union) changed the US forever from how we were created.

That's what the constitution was for. To change from how we were created, to how we should continue our existence in the future.

"I was born a poor black child" - Steve Martin (the jerk)

 

[postman]

Why do you feel it necessary to be able to kill another human being, especially now that your party has embraced infanticide, too.

GOD aborts nearly half of all embryos.

Like father like son, like the holy ghost?

 

[Moonglow]

Why do you feel it necessary to be able to kill another human being, especially now that your party has embraced infanticide, too.


"New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

And....
"Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats



"California Assembly Health Committee Passes Bill That Would Legalize Infanticide
State | Steven Ertelt | Apr 20, 2022
The California Assembly committee has passed a radical bill that legal analysts say would legalize infanticide, letting babies die up to 28 days after birth. The panel voted for the measure on an 11-3 vote.

California Assembly Health Committee Passes Bill That Would Legalize Infanticide - LifeNews.com​

The California Assembly committee has passed a radical bill that legal analysts say would legalize infanticide, letting babies die up to 28 after birth. The panel voted for the measure on an 11-3 vote. California Assembly Bill 2223, sponsored by Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, already has...
www.lifenews.com
.

The California Bill would allow mothers to kill new borns, just as Democrat Northam described:






View attachment 639828

You'd make a lousy soldier. Plus infanticide is illegal in all fifty states but Repubs want to marry them in Tennessee..

 

[Moonglow]

Mr. Dershowitz refers to the "right to abortion."


There is no such "right."


Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

Rights belong to each human individually.

Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

• To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.
• 
  For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.

Get that/
Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.
Clealy, abortion infringes on the right of the other individual involved.

Then why does God kill?

 

[postman]

Then why does God kill?

Why does politicalchic RUN AWAY, when she can't answer the question.

 

[Moonglow]

Why does politicalchic RUN AWAY, when she can't answer the question.

She's/he's a known liar and propagandist, she/he has no intention of honest discussions because that would ruin her control of the subject.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Prove the existence of God....

Next......prove that God is the God you claim was in the Bible....

We all have been waiting for thousands of years......so make it snappy

 

[JoeBlow]

See, you've proven once again that you are as dumb as asphalt.


No, traveling through the birth canal is not the requirement for being a human being.



Here is your biology lesson, dunce:

Take notes, so you don't make the same mistake again.


1. “The formation, maturation and meeting of a male and female sex cell are all preliminary to their actual union into a combined cell, or zygote, which definitely marks the beginning of a new individual. The penetration of the ovum by the spermatozoon, and the coming together and pooling of their respective nuclei, constitutes the process of fertilization.”
Ronan O’Rahilly and Fabiola Miller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.



2. “Although life is a continuous process, fertilization… is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new genetically distinct human organism is formed when the chromosomes of the male and female pronuclei blend in the oocyte.”

“[All] organisms, however large and complex they might be as full grown, begin life as a single cell. This is true for the human being, for instance, who begins life as a fertilized ovum.”

"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being...[this] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence...." - Dr Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Genetics at the University of Descartes, Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down's Syndrome, and Nobel Prize Winner

"An individual human life begins at conception when a sperm cell from the father fuses with an egg cell from the mother, to form a new cell, the zygote, the first embryonic stage. The zygote grows and divides into two daughter cells, each of which grows and divides into two grand-daughter cells, and this cell growth/division process continues on, over and over again. The zygote is the start of a biological continuum that automatically grows and develops, passing gradually and sequentially through the stages we call foetus, baby, child, adult, old person and ending eventually in death. The full genetic instructions to guide the development of the continuum, in interaction with its environment, are present in the zygote. Every stage along the continuum is biologically human and each point along the continuum has the full human properties appropriate to that point." - Dr. William Reville, University College Cork, Ireland

You want to tell other people what to do with their own bodies, just like the Taliban.

Women are still going to have abortions, so you lose anyways. lol

 

[PoliticalChic]

When the US was created there was legal slavery.
The 13th amendment (making us a more perfect union) changed the US forever from how we were created.

That's what the constitution was for. To change from how we were created, to how we should continue our existence in the future.

"I was born a poor black child" - Steve Martin (the jerk)

I believe you are getting the point: every sort of malfeasance is due to one party: the Democrats.
The same one that is out to authorize the slaughter of the unborn.



1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne


2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, of Nathan Bedford Forrest and the Knights of the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.


3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.


4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress



5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.


6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.


7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.



8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..


9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.


10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.



11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?



12. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism.



13. It's the party of felons over law-abiding actual citizens



14. No shared values, not an American party…they oppose free speech, the second amendment, and the free practice of one’s religion.



15. Recent development prove the Democrats to be, as well, the party of rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists.



Democrats: Bull Connor, George Wallace, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox, Al Gore, Sr., Bill Clinton….all racists, all Democrats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You want to tell other people what to do with their own bodies, just like the Taliban.

Women are still going to have abortions, so you lose anyways. lol

Gads, you're an imbecile.


The unborn human being you desire to kill is not a part of her body.



There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?




Now say "duhhhhhhh......"

 

[PoliticalChic]

GOD aborts nearly half of all embryos.

Like father like son, like the holy ghost?

Sooo.....now you're claiming you are God?????????



Well....you did call Obama god, Jesus and the messiah.....not so much any more, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why does politicalchic RUN AWAY, when she can't answer the question.

I understand you need me to provide your education, but I have many other obligations, too.

 

[JoeBlow]

Gads, you're an imbecile.


The unborn human being you desire to kill is not a part of her body.



There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

View attachment 639858

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?




Now say "duhhhhhhh......"

You can't stop abortions, you're just a comedian, lol.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You can't stop abortions, you're just a comedian, lol.

Wow....you sure ran from your last bloviation pretty darn quick.

At least you learned that the unborn human being is not a part of the mother's body, huh?

Wanna say 'thank you' for the biology lesson???




In reading your posts, one has a sense that you majored in mops and buckets in commercial high school.....true????

 

[Donald H]

At least 59% of Americans are pro-abortion.

Thst statement needs to be restated to say that a majority of Americans are pro-life and pro-freedom of choice for women.

The Scotus tried to keep the decision against women's rights covered up but now it's in the hands of the people and the majority are going to raise hell over being stripped of even more rights.

The 27 countries in the world with the most freedom

Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization, measures freedom in terms of civil liberties and political rights for an annual report.

www.businessinsider.com

You can't be on both sides hon!

 

[PoliticalChic]

At least 59% of Americans are pro-abortion.

Thst statement needs to be restated to say that a majority of Americans are pro-life and pro-freedom of choice for women.

The Scotus tried to keep the decision against women's rights covered up but now it's in the hands of the people and the majority are going to raise hell over being stripped of even more rights.

The 27 countries in the world with the most freedom

Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization, measures freedom in terms of civil liberties and political rights for an annual report.

www.businessinsider.com

You can't be on both sides hon!

Morality, of course, means nothing to Fascists like you.....


Here, this should cheer you up:

On March 12, 1938, Hitler’s troops rolled over the border from Germany, into Austria. This was the Anschluss, the annexation of Austria into Greater Germany. Three days later, Hitler entered Vienna, greeted by an enthusiastic crowd of up to one million people. A plebiscite was held in less than a month, 10 April 1938, and 99.7% of Austrians voted to join the Third Reich.


Nov 12, 1933 93.5% of German electorate (43,000,000) voted in favor of Nazi policies.

 

[JoeBlow]

Wow....you sure ran from your last bloviation pretty darn quick.

At least you learned that the unborn human being is not a part of the mother's body, huh?

Wanna say 'thank you' for the biology lesson???




In reading your posts, one has a sense that you majored in mops and buckets in commercial high school.....true????

The fetus is part of the body until it's born, that's why it's inside the body, attached to the body, comes from the body and is nurtured by the body and without the body, it would die. Your nincompoop quotes notwithstanding.

 

[JoeBlow]

Will god still be allowed to perform spontaneous abortions?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The fetus is part of the body until it's born, that's why it's inside the body, attached to the body, comes from the body and is nurtured by the body and without the body, it would die. Your nincompoop quotes notwithstanding.

Are you really so dumb that you don't realize I've obliterated every post you've authored???


No, the Constitution doesn't authorize or even mention anything like abortion.

The organism is a separate and distinct human being from the instant the sperm and egg combine.

No.....there is not excuse for abortion in 98.5% of the cases, even if you allow it for rape and incest. Every other case is for convenience.


No, the unborn is not a part of the mother's body....it has a unique DNA component.

A mother breast feeding her new born is just as nourishing and just as necessary to that organism....but you want the a"right" to kill that one too.



By the way, dope.....this is the etymology of fetus....

fetus (n.)
late 14c., "the young while in the womb or egg" (tending to mean vaguely the embryo in the later stage of development), from Latin fetus (often, incorrectly, foetus) "the bearing or hatching of young, a bringing forth, pregnancy, childbearing, offspring,"
fetus | Origin and meaning of fetus by Online Etymology Dictionary
No, it's not a 'right,' which would men it does not impinge on anyone else's rights.

No, overturning Roe would not ban abortion, it would be left to the states as it should be.

And the demand for infanticide by you savages is not to be allowed in Western Civilization.