Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
Yes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Not at all, comrade. But you should know the mentality of a Russian. They just can't live without 'strong hand'. No matter what this hand is - communist, nationalist, monarchist or combined of them all. All ends the same.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Slavery better with a commie boot on your throat, eh comrade?
i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
en.wikipedia.org
No, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
I disagree with that. I want to remind you it was Lenin who started NEP.
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
I disagree with that. I want to remind you it was Lenin who started NEP.
@Lenin who started NEP.
people were eating each other, it was a tactical decision, S Kotkin explained it very well
Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928
books.google.se › books
Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 Stephen Kotkin ... But Stalin, who did not like the NEP any more than Trotsky did, crucially, like Lenin, and because of Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics for the greater cause: Stalin accepted the ...
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
I disagree with that. I want to remind you it was Lenin who started NEP.
@Lenin who started NEP.
people were eating each other, it was a tactical decision, S Kotkin explained it very well
Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928
books.google.se › books
Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 Stephen Kotkin ... But Stalin, who did not like the NEP any more than Trotsky did, crucially, like Lenin, and because of Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics for the greater cause: Stalin accepted the ...
Don't confuse the famines in the early 20s caused primarily by the Civil war (and prodrazverstka as the result) and those of 1930s.
I am almost sure, if Lenin had stayed in power through all 20s and 30s, there wouldn't have been those severe famines caused by Stalin's policy.
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with PutinNo, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.i wrote : "the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same countryYes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
I disagree with that. I want to remind you it was Lenin who started NEP.
@Lenin who started NEP.
people were eating each other, it was a tactical decision, S Kotkin explained it very well
Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928
books.google.se › books
Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 Stephen Kotkin ... But Stalin, who did not like the NEP any more than Trotsky did, crucially, like Lenin, and because of Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics for the greater cause: Stalin accepted the ...
Don't confuse the famines in the early 20s caused primarily by the Civil war (and prodrazverstka as the result) and those of 1930s.
I am almost sure, if Lenin had stayed in power through all 20s and 30s, there wouldn't have been those severe famines caused by Stalin's policy.
Don't confuse the famines in the early 20s caused primarily by the Civil war (and prodrazverstka as the result) and those of 1930s.
i dont , one for sure you dont know that soviet peasants went semi - hungry from first day Bolshevik takeover to the 70s.
",
«Gr. Sikorskaya stabbed her 9-year-old child at night. She managed to eat part of her entrails, drowned her second child tomorrow and died of exhaustion. "
"The wife of a poor man who went to work in the city, returned home and found his son dead, cut off the child's legs and boiled with sorrel… The next day she and her second child died."
These are quotes from documents about the events of 1932-1933 in Soviet Belarus - in Mozyr, Yelsk, Narovlya districts (documents in the National Archives were found by Belarusian historian Irina Romanova)."
I am almost sure, if Lenin had stayed in power through all 20s and 30s, there wouldn't have been those severe famines caused by Stalin's policy.
you are wrong, Ulyanov was the real commie, and communism can not exist side by side with free peasants . Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics (NEP ) for the greater cause
