How's that Brezhnev Doctrine working out for you, eh?
It doesn't matter how good or bad doctrine is. Everything depends on the ones who realize it.
USSR realized themselves right into the toilet.
Yes, its economical and political system sucked. Thanks to asshole Stalin that abolished NEP and virtually destroyed the collective based system of power.
any commie czar ´do the same. you can not have free peasants and communism in the same country
Before the communism, there weren't free peasants there also. It is not about communism at all.
with all my hate to Muscovite czras you are wrong, in 1917 the majority of
peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off
Formally yes, they were free. But the conditions of their living were (on the most part of the empire) somewhat far from the term 'quite well off'.
i wrote : "the majority of
peasants were free and in Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy quite well off " , do you want to say that commie gang gave to peasants (Poland&Ukraine &Belarus¢ral - south Muscovy) more?
Collectivization in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Collectivization_in_the_Sovi...
The Soviet Union implemented the collectivization (Russian: Коллективизация) of its ... collective farms dropped by 50% in 1930. But soon
collectivisation was intensified again, and by 1936, about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized.
en.wikipedia.org
No, thanks to asshole Stalin. I think you know that even Lenin warned his fellows from giving Stalin too much power.
its a wellknown myth , Ulyanov was a hardcore brutal terrorist and Marxist much like koba. Ulyanov
chose KOba to be his successor, Much like Yeltsin did with Putin
I disagree with that. I want to remind you it was Lenin who started NEP.
@Lenin who started NEP.
people were eating each other, it was a tactical decision, S Kotkin explained it very well
Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928
books.google.se › books
Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 Stephen
Kotkin ... But Stalin, who did not like the
NEP any more than
Trotsky did, crucially, like
Lenin, and because of
Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics for the greater cause: Stalin accepted the ...
Don't confuse the famines in the early 20s caused primarily by the Civil war (and prodrazverstka as the result) and those of 1930s.
I am almost sure, if Lenin had stayed in power through all 20s and 30s, there wouldn't have been those severe famines caused by Stalin's policy.
Don't confuse the famines in the early 20s caused primarily by the Civil war (and prodrazverstka as the result) and those of 1930s.
i dont , one for sure you dont know that soviet peasants went semi - hungry from first day Bolshevik takeover to the 70s.
",
«
Gr. Sikorskaya stabbed her 9-year-old child at night. She managed to eat part of her entrails, drowned her second child tomorrow and died of exhaustion. "
"The wife of a poor man who went to work in the city, returned home and found his son dead, cut off the child's legs and boiled with sorrel… The next day she and her second child died."
These are quotes from documents about the events of 1932-1933 in Soviet Belarus - in Mozyr, Yelsk, Narovlya districts (documents in the National Archives were found by Belarusian historian Irina Romanova)."
I am almost sure, if Lenin had stayed in power through all 20s and 30s, there wouldn't have been those severe famines caused by Stalin's policy.
you are wrong,
Ulyanov was the real commie, and communism can not exist side by side with free peasants .
Lenin, understood the necessity of flexible tactics (NEP ) for the greater cause