Require mod to tell you when you’re thread-banned

[Lisa558]

When someone on a thread complains about your post, and the mod decides to ban you from the thread, shouldn’t the mod have to let you KNOW and say what rule you violated?

As it stands now, I can be participating on a thread, only to discover when I try to reply that I’ve been banned from it. No notice. No explanation.

 

[Moonglow]

I get told when I is banned

 

[JGalt]

When someone on a thread complains about your post, and the mod decides to ban you from the thread, shouldn’t the mod have to let you KNOW and say what rule you violated?

As it stands now, I can be participating on a thread, only to discover when I try to reply that I’ve been banned from it. No notice. No explanation.

You haven't lived until you've been banned from a thread you yourself started.

 

[Lisa558]

You haven't lived until you've been banned from a thread you yourself started.

Oh goodie! Something to look forward to….

(Now watch. A mod with a nasty sense of humor who disagrees with my politics will ban me from this one….and again with no notice.)

 

[Mack The Finger]

I get told when I is banned

.
Why would you get banned moonunit ?
.
.

​

 

[jbrownson0831]

Oh goodie! Something to look forward to….

(Now watch. A mod with a nasty sense of humor who disagrees with my politics will ban me from this one….and again with no notice.)

Say it ain't so, Lisa....say it ain't so......

 

[JGalt]

.
Why would you get banned moonunit ?
.
.

View attachment 1102562​

Why doesn't he get banned, is a more pertinent question.

 

[candycorn]

Has there ever been a day when you haven’t whined about something?

 

[odanny]

Has there ever been a day when you haven’t whined about something?

If I could understand anyone ever being thread banned.....

 

[Captain Caveman]

When someone on a thread complains about your post, and the mod decides to ban you from the thread, shouldn’t the mod have to let you KNOW and say what rule you violated?

As it stands now, I can be participating on a thread, only to discover when I try to reply that I’ve been banned from it. No notice. No explanation.

I think the system accumulates the points, so an infraction can tip you into a ban because of the points against you. So a mod can let you know the final nail in the coffin that tipped you into a timeout. Other than that, it would have to have been a serious incident for someone to go direct to a ban. Imo.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Oh goodie! Something to look forward to….

(Now watch. A mod with a nasty sense of humor who disagrees with my politics will ban me from this one….and again with no notice.)

Nothing of value will be lost.

 

[d0gbreath]

I get a notification by DM every time I get infracted. But, politics aside, people tend to like me.

 

[Lisa558]

I get a notification by DM every time I get infracted. But, politics aside, people tend to like me.

The mods are almost all Democrat, and so are you. Might have something to do with it.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

If you don't want to be thread banned, and this goes for every forum member, follow the rules. It's that simple.

Some of the biggest reasons people get banned from threads are:

• Flaming only replies
• Disrupting the thread by trying to change the topic / off topic comments

 

[Lisa558]

If you don't want to be thread banned, and this goes for every forum member, follow the rules. It's that simple.

Some of the biggest reasons people get banned from threads are:

• Flaming only replies
• Disrupting the thread by trying to change the topic / off topic comments

But sometimes it’s not clear as to why someone is banned, and there’s no notice or explanation. Other times, posters are just horrific - making disgusting bigoted remarks in a Zone 1 thread - and they are not banned. I also see terrible flaming all the time.

If we were to be told why we are banned from a thread, we could see how rules are applied equally, or not.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Oh goodie! Something to look forward to….

(Now watch. A mod with a nasty sense of humor who disagrees with my politics will ban me from this one….and again with no notice.)

When you realize that liberal Canadians bought this forum and HATE the Right ;-)
The marxist Lefty mods will do that to you a LOT or so I m fairly certain

 

[Lisa558]

When you realize that liberal Canadians bought this forum and HATE the Right ;-)
The marxist Lefty mods will do that to you a LOT or so I m fairly certain

What? Is that true? NOW it’s starting to make sense. It was so weird that all of a sudden the racism forum disappeared in order to protect blacks from any possible criticism while the antisemites descended en masse and have been allowed to spew their venom.

 

[Foxfyre]

I think the system accumulates the points, so an infraction can tip you into a ban because of the points against you. So a mod can let you know the final nail in the coffin that tipped you into a timeout. Other than that, it would have to have been a serious incident for someone to go direct to a ban. Imo.

That would make it tough when the troll brigade teams up against somebody. If it is based only on reports by that group, anybody could be thread banned or banned outright without violating any rule of the board.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

But sometimes it’s not clear as to why someone is banned, and there’s no notice or explanation. Other times, posters are just horrific - making disgusting bigoted remarks in a Zone 1 thread - and they are not banned. I also see terrible flaming all the time.

If we were to be told why we are banned from a thread, we could see how rules are applied equally, or not.

They aren't. Since when are marxist liberals "fair" and "balanced"

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

If you don't want to be thread banned, and this goes for every forum member, follow the rules. It's that simple.

Some of the biggest reasons people get banned from threads are:

• Flaming only replies
• Disrupting the thread by trying to change the topic / off topic comments

WELL HELLOOOOO THERE !!
I have the forums greatest number of thread bans, a badge of honor!