Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

[whutTHEYsay]

1000 81. you don’t have to be “the smartest guy in the room” SEE rwbsw01080 to love truth and be the bestest grampa in the world if you knows what I mean

Says

i. NotfooledbyW mlxxi to 1070: I have never been a big fan of religious zealots demanding conformity of the mind and behaviors over and above conformity with basic common laws. nfbw 241229 Vrwbsw01071

ii. ding mlxxiii to 1071: Says the guy who would criminalize the commercialization of fetus parts but not the actual killing of the fetus. Brilliant. dvng 241229 Srwbsw01073

iii. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : As a religious zealot College Grad “without bad behaviors” Ding, you still have no right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of your law abiding fellow citizens who present to you no harm by and such as living in Ohio where the voters established and enshrined that fetal murder as the potential birth mother’s choice is protected in the Ohio Constitution from criminalization by religious zealots.

I expect Saint Ding, who claims he sleeps like a baby at night {see rwbsw01065} and is highly educatedl, will concede some day that pregnant women have equal rights to privacy as white male Christian Republican men and it is harming them to have government take it away.

He will at some moment in time realize the absurdity of his white Christian male ***** grabbing post Srwbsw01073 that women’s right to privacy causes no harm because of the private nature of that reality in life; but commercialization of fetus parts is a “public” affair subject to the regulation of commerce for the public general welfare. Thus commercialization of fetus parts must be criminalized to protect women from being lured into risking their health by intentionally getting pregnant with the intent to sell her aborted fetus for personal income out of participation in the public sector. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw0108

iv. daveman xii,dccclxxxvi to 12884. : I'm saying the baby she had a part in creating ALSO has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. dvmn 241125 Srvwgo12886

v. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : Say it all you like Saint Daveman but we are not cave people anymore. Most modern women reject being dragged around by their hair by a club wielding male like Don Trump. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw01081

 

[ding]

1000 81. you don’t have to be “the smartest guy in the room” SEE rwbsw01080 to love truth and be the bestest grampa in the world if you knows what I mean


i. NotfooledbyW mlxxi to 1070: I have never been a big fan of religious zealots demanding conformity of the mind and behaviors over and above conformity with basic common laws. nfbw 241229 Vrwbsw01071

ii. ding mlxxiii to 1071: Says the guy who would criminalize the commercialization of fetus parts but not the actual killing of the fetus. Brilliant. dvng 241229 Srwbsw01073

iii. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : As a religious zealot College Grad “without bad behaviors” Ding, you still have no right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of your law abiding fellow citizens who present to you no harm by and such as living in Ohio where the voters established and enshrined that fetal murder as the potential birth mother’s choice is protected in the Ohio Constitution from criminalization by religious zealots.

I expect Saint Ding, who claims he sleeps like a baby at night {see rwbsw01065} and is highly educatedl, will concede some day that pregnant women have equal rights to privacy as white male Christian Republican men and it is harming them to have government take it away.

He will at some moment in time realize the absurdity of his white Christian male ***** grabbing post Srwbsw01073 that women’s right to privacy causes no harm because of the private nature of that reality in life; but commercialization of fetus parts is a “public” affair subject to the regulation of commerce for the public general welfare. Thus commercialization of fetus parts must be criminalized to protect women from being lured into risking their health by intentionally getting pregnant with the intent to sell her aborted fetus for personal income out of participation in the public sector. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw0108

iv. daveman xii,dccclxxxvi to 12884. : I'm saying the baby she had a part in creating ALSO has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. dvmn 241125 Srvwgo12886

v. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : Say it all you like Saint Daveman but we are not cave people anymore. Most modern women reject being dragged around by their hair by a club wielding male like Don Trump. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw01081

Way too disjointed to follow. Is that how you quoted work when you were an order taker?

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Way too disjointed to follow. Is that how you quoted work when you were an order taker?

Saint Ding is stuck.

this is quicksand to the mind of Saint Ding:

As a religious zealot College Grad “without bad behaviors” Ding, you still have no right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of your law abiding fellow citizens who present to you no harm by and such as living in Ohio where the voters established and enshrined that fetal murder as the potential birth mother’s choice is protected in the Ohio Constitution from criminalization by religious zealots.

I expect Saint Ding, who claims he sleeps like a baby at night {see rwbsw01065} and is highly educated, will concede some day that pregnant women have equal rights to privacy as white male Christian Republican men and it is harming them to have government take it away.

He will at some moment in time realize the absurdity of his white Christian male ***** grabbing post Srwbsw01073 that women’s right to privacy causes no harm because of the private nature of that reality in life; but commercialization of fetus parts is a “public” affair subject to the regulation of commerce for the public general welfare. Thus commercialization of fetus parts must be criminalized to protect women from being lured into risking their health by intentionally getting pregnant with the intent to sell her aborted fetus for personal income out of participation in the public sector.

 

[initforme]

Have the number of abortions gone down since roe was overturned? Anyone know? I'd think they've gone way down.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Have the number of abortions gone down since roe was overturned? Anyone know? I'd think they've gone way down.

it would be good if they did but they are not;

Abortions are up in the US. The data paints a complicated picture

Even with abortion bans in place in most Republican-controlled states, the number of people obtaining them has grown slightly.

apnews.com

 

[whutTHEYsay]

I would like to see ding explain why he has the right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of law abiding citizens who present no harm to him when what they are doing is supposedly sinful and against his Catholic faith.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" ding @Dong Invokes Legal Positivism From Habitual Liars Denying It "

* ding @Dong Invokes Bull Shit Excuses From Contemporary Natural Law Theory *

I would like to see ding explain why he has the right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of law abiding citizens who present no harm to him when what they are doing is supposedly sinful and against his Catholic faith.

ding @Dong invokes goad and bestows upon itself the authority to enforce the conjectural will and law of goad that does nothing to stop abortion , or death , or to issue a retort for either , in and of itself .

 

[ding]

I would like to see ding explain why he has the right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of law abiding citizens who present no harm to him when what they are doing is supposedly sinful and against his Catholic faith.

Because ending a human life is a crime.

 

[ding]

Saint Ding is stuck.

this is quicksand to the mind of Saint Ding:

As a religious zealot College Grad “without bad behaviors” Ding, you still have no right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of your law abiding fellow citizens who present to you no harm by and such as living in Ohio where the voters established and enshrined that fetal murder as the potential birth mother’s choice is protected in the Ohio Constitution from criminalization by religious zealots.

I expect Saint Ding, who claims he sleeps like a baby at night {see rwbsw01065} and is highly educated, will concede some day that pregnant women have equal rights to privacy as white male Christian Republican men and it is harming them to have government take it away.

He will at some moment in time realize the absurdity of his white Christian male ***** grabbing post Srwbsw01073 that women’s right to privacy causes no harm because of the private nature of that reality in life; but commercialization of fetus parts is a “public” affair subject to the regulation of commerce for the public general welfare. Thus commercialization of fetus parts must be criminalized to protect women from being lured into risking their health by intentionally getting pregnant with the intent to sell her aborted fetus for personal income out of participation in the public sector.

No. I think you are the one who is stuck. You're a fanatic; an ideologue. And a rather dumb and dishonest one at that.

 

[ding]

" ding @Dong Invokes Legal Positivism From Habitual Liars Denying It "

* ding @Dong Invokes Bull Shit Excuses From Contemporary Natural Law Theory *

ding @Dong invokes goad and bestows upon itself the authority to enforce the conjectural will and law of goad that does nothing to stop abortion , or death , or to issue a retort for either , in and of itself .

So killing a baby in the womb isn't a crime but profiting from its dead carcass is a crime?

 

[ding]

who present no harm to him when what they are doing is supposedly sinful and against his Catholic faith.

This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the violation of human rights. You can't just kill a human being and not expect it to be a crime at some level. Even if it is only a misdemeanor with no jail time. I think you are being entirely unreasonable but that's exactly how fanatics and zealots usually behave when they lose their shit because someone has a different belief.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Ethical Dilemmas Of Scientifically Factual Purposes For Quality Of Life "

* Arcane Carnality Invokes Law Of Nature That Does Not Exact Death As Retort For Murder *

So killing a baby in the womb isn't a crime but profiting from its dead carcass is a crime?

Women are not having elective abortion for profit to satisfy yearn own lust for a hue mammon skin lamp shade .

Ethics - Financial Incentives for Organ Donation - OPTN

The OPTN is operated under contract with the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). This Web site provides data and educational information about organ donation, transplantation and the matching process.

optn.transplant.hrsa.gov

The concept that financial incentives be offered as a potential solution to the ongoing organ donor shortage has been previously considered and debated among experts in the fields of transplantation, ethics, law, and economics (1) . The background for this proposal remains the ever-growing need for increased organ acquisition and the undeniable fact that the current system, despite 30 years of experience based on altruistic donation, has yet to meet this need. Historically, the current system of organ donation based on altruism evolved during the 1960's and 1970's when issues such as the definition of brain death, the use of donor cards, and public attitudes toward donation were only just evolving. Based on the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act and the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, the buying and selling of organs has been specifically prohibited (2). In the late 1980s required request legislation was adopted, but has yet to demonstrate a significant effect in the rate of organ donation.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

ding @Dong invokes goad and bestows upon itself the authority to enforce the conjectural will and law of goad that does nothing to stop abortion , or death , or to issue a retort for either , in and of itself .

If you accept the concept of American Civil Religion, can you articulate in your impressive style an explanation of America’s civil religion that maybe Saint Ding could soon begin to understand that most American Christians do not attempt to impose their religious belief on their neighbors through force of law?

American civil religion - Wikipedia America’s Civil or Civic Religion is the nonsectarian and anti-dogmatic spirit of the United States of America that all persons are created equal and that no matter of conscienceis is of more value to being governed by the people’s consent than any other. All matters of conscience and religion and personal morality are equally separated from the state in a Deistic/Jeffersonian ideal Republic.​

 

[whutTHEYsay]

1000 94. “A woman who deliberately destroys a fetus is answerable for murder. And any fine distinction as to its being completely formed or unformed is not admissible among us.”. St. Basil the Great, however (374-5), nfbw 241330 Vrwbsw01094

NotfooledbyW mxciv to 1091. : St Basil had nothing to do with the founding of America. So why are Catholics spending billions to force women into full time gestation if they get pregnant but do not expect to give birth.

ding mxci to 1086. : This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the violation of human rights. dvng 241230 Srwbsw01091

NotfooledbyW mxciv to 1091. : The only argument that the sanctity of life begins at conception is a religious one. nfbw 241330 Vrwbsw01094

 

[ding]

" Ethical Dilemmas Of Scientifically Factual Purposes For Quality Of Life "

* Arcane Carnality Invokes Law Of Nature That Does Not Exact Death As Retort For Murder *

Women are not having elective abortion for profit to satisfy yearn own lust for a hue mammon skin lamp shade .

Ethics - Financial Incentives for Organ Donation - OPTN

The OPTN is operated under contract with the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). This Web site provides data and educational information about organ donation, transplantation and the matching process.

optn.transplant.hrsa.gov

The concept that financial incentives be offered as a potential solution to the ongoing organ donor shortage has been previously considered and debated among experts in the fields of transplantation, ethics, law, and economics (1) . The background for this proposal remains the ever-growing need for increased organ acquisition and the undeniable fact that the current system, despite 30 years of experience based on altruistic donation, has yet to meet this need. Historically, the current system of organ donation based on altruism evolved during the 1960's and 1970's when issues such as the definition of brain death, the use of donor cards, and public attitudes toward donation were only just evolving. Based on the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act and the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, the buying and selling of organs has been specifically prohibited (2). In the late 1980s required request legislation was adopted, but has yet to demonstrate a significant effect in the rate of organ donation.

Your position is that it isn't a crime to kill a baby in the womb but it is a crime to use their dead carcasses for commercial purposes. Brilliant.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Parallels Between Stupid Ideas And Disingenuous Reprobates "

* Loser By Reductio Ad Absurdum *

Your position is that it isn't a crime to kill a baby in the womb but it is a crime to use their dead carcasses for commercial purposes. Brilliant.

It is a crime to use a dead carcass of a fetus for yearn debase conjecture of a hue mammon skin lamp .

There is not a parallel or ethical correlation between elective abortion and being able to construct a hue mammon skin lamp shade .

Previously yearn oaths admitted to include an allegiance for torturing pundits of legal positivism , which stands opposed to dogma of contemporary natural law ( sic ) , as legal positivism decries that contemporary natural law ( sic ) has nothing to do with a law of nature .

The macabre of abortion anti-choice stupidity includes an inability to acknowledge that for empathy to be valid for the suffering of another , then sentience must be physically possible for suffering .

A zygote , an embryo ,and pre-viability fetus are without sentience and incapable of suffering , whereby an infliction of commensurate suffering upon a pundit of legal positivism could not be justified , by equitable doctrine .


* Combination Querying Whether Fetal Research Is Virtuous *

4.1.14 Human Fetal Tissue Research

Describes human fetal tissue research, including additional requirements for research on transplantation of human fetal tissue.

grants.nih.gov

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for a non virtuous purposes is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for a non virtuous purposes is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for virtuous purposes is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for virtuous purposes is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for virtuous purposes and is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for virtuous purposes and is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for non virtuous purposes and is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for non virtuous purposes and is not a crime ?

 

[ding]

" Parallels Between Stupid Ideas And Disingenuous Reprobates "

* Loser By Reductio Ad Absurdum *

It is a crime to use a dead carcass of a fetus for yearn debase conjecture of a hue mammon skin lamp .

There is not a parallel or ethical correlation between elective abortion and being able to construct a hue mammon skin lamp shade .

Previously yearn oaths admitted to include an allegiance for torturing pundits of legal positivism , which stands opposed to dogma of contemporary natural law ( sic ) , as legal positivism decries that contemporary natural law ( sic ) has nothing to do with a law of nature .

The macabre of abortion anti-choice stupidity includes an inability to acknowledge that for empathy to be valid for the suffering of another , then sentience must be physically possible for suffering .

A zygote , an embryo ,and pre-viability fetus are without sentience and incapable of suffering , whereby an infliction of commensurate suffering upon a pundit of legal positivism could not be justified , by equitable doctrine .


* Combination Querying Whether Fetal Research Is Virtuous *

4.1.14 Human Fetal Tissue Research

Describes human fetal tissue research, including additional requirements for research on transplantation of human fetal tissue.

grants.nih.gov

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for a non virtuous purposes is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for a non virtuous purposes is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for virtuous purposes is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where dead carcasses used for virtuous purposes is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for virtuous purposes and is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for virtuous purposes and is not a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for non virtuous purposes and is a crime ?

Which is an ethical dilemma from hue where elective abortion is exercised by the individual for non virtuous purposes and is not a crime ?

Amazing. You care more about what is done to a dead hue mammon than you do about what is done to a living hue mammon.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Stop Fabricating Lies To Bare False Witness "

* Recommend Seek Mental Health Support For Anthropocentric Psychosis *

Amazing. You care more about what is done to a dead hue mammon than you do about what is done to a living hue mammon.

42 U.S. Code § 289g-2 - Prohibitions regarding human fetal tissue

www.law.cornell.edu

Genetic Engineers Are Crazy

Ding A Four Assed Monkey

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ding]

" Stop Fabricating Lies To Bare False Witness "

* Recommend Seek Mental Health Support For Anthropocentric Psychosis *

42 U.S. Code § 289g-2 - Prohibitions regarding human fetal tissue

www.law.cornell.edu

Genetic Engineers Are Crazy

Ding A Four Assed Monkey

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

So it's not a crime to kill them but it's a crime to sell them?

 

[daveman]

1000 81. you don’t have to be “the smartest guy in the room” SEE rwbsw01080 to love truth and be the bestest grampa in the world if you knows what I mean


i. NotfooledbyW mlxxi to 1070: I have never been a big fan of religious zealots demanding conformity of the mind and behaviors over and above conformity with basic common laws. nfbw 241229 Vrwbsw01071

ii. ding mlxxiii to 1071: Says the guy who would criminalize the commercialization of fetus parts but not the actual killing of the fetus. Brilliant. dvng 241229 Srwbsw01073

iii. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : As a religious zealot College Grad “without bad behaviors” Ding, you still have no right to impose restriction of liberty into the private decisions and behaviors of your law abiding fellow citizens who present to you no harm by and such as living in Ohio where the voters established and enshrined that fetal murder as the potential birth mother’s choice is protected in the Ohio Constitution from criminalization by religious zealots.

I expect Saint Ding, who claims he sleeps like a baby at night {see rwbsw01065} and is highly educatedl, will concede some day that pregnant women have equal rights to privacy as white male Christian Republican men and it is harming them to have government take it away.

He will at some moment in time realize the absurdity of his white Christian male ***** grabbing post Srwbsw01073 that women’s right to privacy causes no harm because of the private nature of that reality in life; but commercialization of fetus parts is a “public” affair subject to the regulation of commerce for the public general welfare. Thus commercialization of fetus parts must be criminalized to protect women from being lured into risking their health by intentionally getting pregnant with the intent to sell her aborted fetus for personal income out of participation in the public sector. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw0108

iv. daveman xii,dccclxxxvi to 12884. : I'm saying the baby she had a part in creating ALSO has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. dvmn 241125 Srvwgo12886

v. NotfooledbyW mlxxxi to 1073. : Say it all you like Saint Daveman but we are not cave people anymore. Most modern women reject being dragged around by their hair by a club wielding male like Don Trump. nfbw 241230 Vrwbsw01081

Your self-important bloviating has gotten tiresome. Bye.