Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

[frigidweirdo]

True - typical Republican hypocrisy.

In addition to the ‘small government’ lie, conservatives claim to be ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – but “states’ rights” goes out the window when it comes to state firearm regulatory measures, they have no problem with tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench contrary to the will of the people in blue states.

Yes, it's "I'll say anything to get what I want, even if it contradicts what I just said".

Like in the UK, when Brexit was "get out of the EU" and Scottish independence is "better off together".

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Looks like the Libtards are being insurrections and threatening harm against the government and the people.

Where is the Justice Department going after them like they went after the 1/6 protesters that took selfies in Pelosi office?

Good for them. I hope they do a better job than the last bunch. The Supreme Court building is still standing. Get on the stick.

 

[initforme]

It's no longer necessary for women to believe they need to have kids. That was the old way of thinking that was messed up. If a growing number of women want to focus on their careers and not have kids that is awesome and a positive. A declining birth is not an issue as some would believe.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

62 million abortions since Roe versus Wade..........and growing.

This actions will not stop abortions...........but will allow states who don't agree with you demented leftist........to tell you to go to hell.

So again, white men telling a woman what she can and can't do with her body.

 

[pknopp]

Looks like the Libtards are being insurrections and threatening harm against the government and the people.

Where is the Justice Department going after them like they went after the 1/6 protesters that took selfies in Pelosi office?

There are protesters in Pelosi's office no one is going after?

 

[Hellbilly]

All of the above and more

That explains a lot, actually.

 

[eagle1462010]

So again, white men telling a woman what she can and can't do with her body.

So again a left wing lunatic justifying 62 million plus abortions.

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.

Oh, that is rich

The Roe v. Wade decision was a handful of people over-riding the legislatures of all fifty states, each of whom had at least some laws that were invalidated by that decision.

The legislatures of those states, acting under authority guaranteed by the IXth Amendment, had determined those laws to be appropriate through decades of negotiations, legislation, and litigation within the state, which has purview over most violent crimes, and most health care regulation.

But the USSC said, "Sorry, you Okies, Coon asses, Sooners, Yankees, Moonbats, New Mexicans, Long Tall Texans, California moonbats, and all you other staters. The men in black will decide for you!

 

[pknopp]

Oh, that is rich

The Roe v. Wade decision was a handful of people over-riding the legislatures of all fifty states, each of whom had at least some laws that were invalidated by that decision.

That is the job of the Supreme Court where applicable. If states enact laws that are unconstitutional it is up to the court to invalidate them. Now the argument is of course if it applicable in this situation but it's not some controversial thing for the court to invalidate state (or even Federal) laws.

The legislatures of those states, acting under authority guaranteed by the IXth Amendment, had determined those laws to be appropriate through decades of negotiations, legislation, and litigation within the state, which has purview over most violent crimes, and most health care regulation.

But the USSC said, "Sorry, you Okies, Coon asses, Sooners, Yankees, Moonbats, New Mexicans, Long Tall Texans, California moonbats, and all you other staters. The men in black will decide for you!

Just as the Brown v BoE decision did.

 

[martybegan]

Horseshit. None of that shit is happening on any significant level in this country, Captain Hyperbole. You're throwing hyper partisan garbage at the wall (as usual), and calling what sticks your new platform for the day. Lazy. Stupid.

"significant level". What level does it have to happen? It is happening, people are pissed off about it, and it's what your side wants.

It's all part of the same package, and you wonder why you are finally getting blowback.

 

[Flash]

OMG! This fat chick ain't going put out if she can't kill children.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

‘If Roe is a "states' rights" issue as Justice Samuel Alito's draft indicates, is Loving v. Virginia, which legalized interracial marriage? Sen. Mike Braun (R-Indiana) already seemed to say that quiet part out loud when he indicated twice during a call with media in March that the Supreme Court was wrong in the 1967 Loving decision, only to backtrack hours later.

[…]

If Roe is a "states' rights" issue, is Obergfell v. Hodges? It has long been comical to me that people howl about the "sanctity of marriage" and that it should only be between a man and a woman and not same-sex, yet this is a country where roughly half of all marriages end in divorce. Yes, yes, very sacred.

Obergfell, which guaranteed all people the right to marry, was decided less than seven years ago.

[…]

Is Brown v. Board of Education "deeply rooted"? The ban on racial segregation in public schools was decided only in 1954, though one can argue there's little done to uphold it even now, 70 years later, when entire districts still have rules policing Black children's hair and banning them from receiving education in schools if they do not comply.’

If Roe v. Wade is overturned, what civil and human rights could be next?

The Supreme Court leak indicates a strong pull on a delicate thread is coming — and the opinion explicitly references other decisions that suddenly seem under threat of unspooling, too.

nz.news.yahoo.com

No one should believe the right’s “states’ rights” lie – that’s merely a façade behind which conservatives attempt to hide their true agenda hostile to the rights and protected liberties of all Americans.

Apples to oranges. Marriage is a basic right
Abortion is not a protected right.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

True - typical Republican hypocrisy.

In addition to the ‘small government’ lie, conservatives claim to be ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – but “states’ rights” goes out the window when it comes to state firearm regulatory measures, they have no problem with tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench contrary to the will of the people in blue states.

States give up control of certain rights that have been handed over to the federal government. Those rights in the bill of rights the states have no say in.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

62 million abortions since Roe versus Wade..........and growing.

This actions will not stop abortions...........but will allow states who don't agree with you demented leftist........to tell you to go to hell.

That's it in a nut shell

 

[Mashmont]

Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe​

You're damn right. We want the whole column of flimsy ruling based on the mythical 'right to privacy' to fall. Gay marriage, the trans crap, contraception mandates for taxpayers. All of it.

 

[initforme]

I'm for abolishing marriage as a whole. Call them all unions. My wife disagrees but that means she's against freedom.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If Roe is overturned it simply goes back to the states and a complete ban on abortion or contraception in any state would be political suicide and would not be upheld in either the state or federal courts.

You are seriously out of touch on this issue.

26 states could ban abortion now that Roe v. Wade is overturned. Here's what business are doing about it. | Fortune

Companies including Amazon, Yelp, and Citigroup have already promised employees to help cover medical and travel expenses for those an abortion ban would affect.

fortune.com

 

[JoeBlow]

You mean the Hillary who's law license was suspended because she didn't meet the education requirements ?

Sure, why not? SCOTUS is chock full of imbeciles.

 

[Ralph Norton]

OMG! This fat chick ain't going put out if she can't kill children.


View attachment 640296

That cow has the nerve to say "No sex for him"?
Easily the most meaningless threat ever uttered.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So again a left wing lunatic justifying 62 million plus abortions.

As if they don’t occur without legal protections.