Republicans vote against vets
- Thread starter Luddly Neddite
- Start date
Dad2three
Gold Member
Cali larger? Don't understand what percentage are huh? lol
CALI DOESN'T HAVE MILITARY BASES HUH? LOL
Red States Feed at Federal Trough, Blue States Supply the Feed
Top Ten (Source: Tax Foundation):
1. New Mexico Indian reservations, military bases, federal research labs, farm subsidies, retirement programs
2. Mississippi Farm subsidies, military spending, nutrition and anti-poverty aid, retirement programs.
3. Alaska Per capita No 1 recipient of federal benefits; infrastructure projects, DOT and pork projects.
4. Louisiana Disaster relief, farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, military spending.
5. W. Virginia Farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid.
6. N. Dakota Farm subsidies, energy subsidies, retirement and anti-poverty programs, Indian reservations.
7. Alabama Retirement programs, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, federal space/military spending, farm subsidies.
8. S. Dakota Retirement programs, nutrition aid, farm subsidies, military spending, Indian reservations.
9. Virginia Civil service pensions, military spending, veterans benefits, retirement, anti-poverty aid.
10. Kentucky Retirement programs, nutritional and anti-poverty aid, farm subsidies.
Now consider the bottom 10, i.e., the ones that give more to the federal government in taxes than they get in return. From 1 to 10, they are:
New Jersey, Nevada, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Illinois, Delaware, California, New York, Colorado.
Anything strange about that list? Yes, they are all blue states (or the deepest of purple).
THEY DON'T HAVE MILITARY RIGHT?
Adding to this fallacy are the assumptions surrounding Mitt Romney’s now infamous comments about the indolent “47 percent” of Americans who regard themselves as victims and therefore pay no taxes. As the American Conservative magazine (no less) pointed out recently, nine of those 10 states are in the red-as-ruby Old Confederacy.*
Blue State, Red Face: Guess Who Benefits More From Your Taxes?
Dad2three
Gold Member
No you CAN'T provide Obama's pledge for no new taxes during sequester, thanks anyways Bubs
eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,559
- 38,566
- 2,605
And the Rant continues.....................there are military bases, NASA, and companies building all over the South....................and with smaller populations in states like Mississippi and Alabama it inflates your BS rhetoric per person so you can LIE YOUR ASS OFF ON THE RED STATE RANT................
Cali larger? Don't understand what percentage are huh? lol
CALI DOESN'T HAVE MILITARY BASES HUH? LOL
Red States Feed at Federal Trough, Blue States Supply the Feed
Top Ten (Source: Tax Foundation):
1. New Mexico Indian reservations, military bases, federal research labs, farm subsidies, retirement programs
2. Mississippi Farm subsidies, military spending, nutrition and anti-poverty aid, retirement programs.
3. Alaska Per capita No 1 recipient of federal benefits; infrastructure projects, DOT and pork projects.
4. Louisiana Disaster relief, farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, military spending.
5. W. Virginia Farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid.
6. N. Dakota Farm subsidies, energy subsidies, retirement and anti-poverty programs, Indian reservations.
7. Alabama Retirement programs, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, federal space/military spending, farm subsidies.
8. S. Dakota Retirement programs, nutrition aid, farm subsidies, military spending, Indian reservations.
9. Virginia Civil service pensions, military spending, veterans benefits, retirement, anti-poverty aid.
10. Kentucky Retirement programs, nutritional and anti-poverty aid, farm subsidies.
Now consider the bottom 10, i.e., the ones that give more to the federal government in taxes than they get in return. From 1 to 10, they are:
New Jersey, Nevada, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Illinois, Delaware, California, New York, Colorado.
Anything strange about that list? Yes, they are all blue states (or the deepest of purple).
THEY DON'T HAVE MILITARY RIGHT?
Adding to this fallacy are the assumptions surrounding Mitt Romney’s now infamous comments about the indolent “47 percent” of Americans who regard themselves as victims and therefore pay no taxes. As the American Conservative magazine (no less) pointed out recently, nine of those 10 states are in the red-as-ruby Old Confederacy.*
Blue State, Red Face: Guess Who Benefits More From Your Taxes?
Mississippi builds BILLIONS of dollars worth of ships.................
Hunstville Al. NASA......
and many more.....................
but ignore that you lying twit............
No one said that California didn't have bases........................but the dollar figure spread out over a larger population makes it look better for YOUR LIES.
eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,559
- 38,566
- 2,605
Read All About It: With the Sequester, President Obama Argues With President Obama
Read All About It: With the Sequester, President Obama Argues With President Obama
Although the President, during the campaign, blamed the Republican House for imposing the sequester on the White House, revelations in Bob Woodward’s book, Jack Lew’s confirmation testimony, Democrat Max Baucus’s interview, and Jay Carney’s confession that “The sequester was something that was discussed… and as has been reported, it was an idea that the White House put forward” confirm that President Obama was the architect of the sequester bill against which he is currently campaigning and blaming Republicans.
Democratic Party leaders have not responded to the Times article. One Republican pundit responded off the record: “We have been telling you this all the time. It’s about time the media told the truth.” A non-partisan political analyst responded to the Times: “I am astonished that an American President whose job is to look after interests of the American people has deliberately crafted a bill that will impose maximum harm on them.” One media giant, The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward has broken the silence, calling Obama’s use of the sequester to politicize national defense “a kind of madness.”
Obaaamaaa..................Let's do a sequester to cut the military and then blame the GOP for doing it..............
Obama..........hah hah good idea.......................let's sell it to Reid........
Reid.......cut the military the public will get pissed............
Obama........we'll do it and blame the GOP..........
Reid .........great idea......let's do it.........
Gang of 6 to keep the military from getting cut............
fails of course..........
Obama, and Reid..................ha ha ha ha ha............
Then blame the cuts on the GOP.............
Obama is a Lying Sac/
eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,559
- 38,566
- 2,605
A new 'Gang of Six' looks for sequester 'balance'
ust to briefly recap for those who’ve forgotten, as part of last year’s debt-ceiling deal, policymakers accepted over $1 trillion in cuts that would be implemented if the so-called supercommittee failed. Democrats weren’t completely willing to roll over – they wanted to create an incentive for Republicans to work in good faith. Republicans agreed: if the committee failed, the GOP would accept defense cuts and Dems would accept non-defense domestic cuts.
The committee, of course, flopped when conservative members refused to compromise, which put us on the clock for the automatic reductions that Republicans contributed to the very process they insisted upon.
Obama has said he’d welcome an alternative solution to replace the triggered sequester, but that’ll require Republicans ready to deal. As of yesterday, three GOP senators at least claim to be ready to look for a “balanced” solution – and that’s three more senators than existed the day before.
Now, I know what some of you are thinking. “Sure, they say they’re open to a balanced compromise,” you’re saying, “but we’ve heard this talk before. When push comes to shove, these Republicans just aren’t sincere about striking a deal.”
That’s hardly an unreasonable assumption, but with McCain and Graham stepping out in front on this, it’s worth noting that these guys really don’t want the automatic Pentagon cuts. They’re obviously, reflexively opposed to tax increases, but on their list of priorities, defense spending is pretty much alone in the top spot. Indeed, it’s not a coincidence that five of the six senators who signed yesterday’s latter are members of the Armed Services Committee.
I still think the odds of an agreement are remote – even if the Senate worked out a deal, it couldn’t pass the House – but they’re slightly better today than they were 24 hours ago.
ust to briefly recap for those who’ve forgotten, as part of last year’s debt-ceiling deal, policymakers accepted over $1 trillion in cuts that would be implemented if the so-called supercommittee failed. Democrats weren’t completely willing to roll over – they wanted to create an incentive for Republicans to work in good faith. Republicans agreed: if the committee failed, the GOP would accept defense cuts and Dems would accept non-defense domestic cuts.
The committee, of course, flopped when conservative members refused to compromise, which put us on the clock for the automatic reductions that Republicans contributed to the very process they insisted upon.
Obama has said he’d welcome an alternative solution to replace the triggered sequester, but that’ll require Republicans ready to deal. As of yesterday, three GOP senators at least claim to be ready to look for a “balanced” solution – and that’s three more senators than existed the day before.
Now, I know what some of you are thinking. “Sure, they say they’re open to a balanced compromise,” you’re saying, “but we’ve heard this talk before. When push comes to shove, these Republicans just aren’t sincere about striking a deal.”
That’s hardly an unreasonable assumption, but with McCain and Graham stepping out in front on this, it’s worth noting that these guys really don’t want the automatic Pentagon cuts. They’re obviously, reflexively opposed to tax increases, but on their list of priorities, defense spending is pretty much alone in the top spot. Indeed, it’s not a coincidence that five of the six senators who signed yesterday’s latter are members of the Armed Services Committee.
I still think the odds of an agreement are remote – even if the Senate worked out a deal, it couldn’t pass the House – but they’re slightly better today than they were 24 hours ago.
Dad2three
Gold Member
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,559
- 38,566
- 2,605
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #50
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Dad2three
Gold Member
And the Rant continues.....................there are military bases, NASA, and companies building all over the South....................and with smaller populations in states like Mississippi and Alabama it inflates your BS rhetoric per person so you can LIE YOUR ASS OFF ON THE RED STATE RANT................
Cali larger? Don't understand what percentage are huh? lol
CALI DOESN'T HAVE MILITARY BASES HUH? LOL
Red States Feed at Federal Trough, Blue States Supply the Feed
Top Ten (Source: Tax Foundation):
1. New Mexico Indian reservations, military bases, federal research labs, farm subsidies, retirement programs
2. Mississippi Farm subsidies, military spending, nutrition and anti-poverty aid, retirement programs.
3. Alaska Per capita No 1 recipient of federal benefits; infrastructure projects, DOT and pork projects.
4. Louisiana Disaster relief, farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, military spending.
5. W. Virginia Farm subsidies, anti-poverty and nutrition aid.
6. N. Dakota Farm subsidies, energy subsidies, retirement and anti-poverty programs, Indian reservations.
7. Alabama Retirement programs, anti-poverty and nutrition aid, federal space/military spending, farm subsidies.
8. S. Dakota Retirement programs, nutrition aid, farm subsidies, military spending, Indian reservations.
9. Virginia Civil service pensions, military spending, veterans benefits, retirement, anti-poverty aid.
10. Kentucky Retirement programs, nutritional and anti-poverty aid, farm subsidies.
Now consider the bottom 10, i.e., the ones that give more to the federal government in taxes than they get in return. From 1 to 10, they are:
New Jersey, Nevada, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Illinois, Delaware, California, New York, Colorado.
Anything strange about that list? Yes, they are all blue states (or the deepest of purple).
THEY DON'T HAVE MILITARY RIGHT?
Adding to this fallacy are the assumptions surrounding Mitt Romney’s now infamous comments about the indolent “47 percent” of Americans who regard themselves as victims and therefore pay no taxes. As the American Conservative magazine (no less) pointed out recently, nine of those 10 states are in the red-as-ruby Old Confederacy.*
Blue State, Red Face: Guess Who Benefits More From Your Taxes?
Mississippi builds BILLIONS of dollars worth of ships.................
Hunstville Al. NASA......
and many more.....................
but ignore that you lying twit............
No one said that California didn't have bases........................but the dollar figure spread out over a larger population makes it look better for YOUR LIES.
Military spending compared to GDP
1) Virginia 13.9% of GDP (BLUE/Purple) (MILITARY CONTRACTORS)
2) Hawaii 13.5% (Blue) 80% payroll
3) Alaska 10.7% (the MOST socialist of ALL state, by far)
4) Alabama 8.6% (Red) (half to contractors)
5) District of Columbia (BLUE) (no GDP, but 71% went to "services")
6) Kentucky 8% (RED) (more than half going to ONE contractor)
7) Maryland 7% (BLUE) (2/3rds contractors)
8) Arizona 6.1% (RED) 80% CONTRACTORS
9) Missippi 6% (RED) 61% CONTRACTORS
10) Missouri 6% (RED) 73% CONTRACTORS
http://www.ct.gov/ecd/lib/ecd/futures/6._bloomberg_defense_spending.pdf
Cost of the Military (per capita) (most recent) by state
DEFINITION:
Cost of the Military. This data set indicates how much money leaves the state in terms of residents' individual income taxes to pay for military spending. In this case, the 'military' is simply defined as the function area (050) 'National Defense' in the federal budget. As such, it does not include other military-related items like financing weapons sales. Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Showing latest available data.
Rank States
# 1 District of Columbia: $3,900.83 per capita
# 2 Delaware: $3,243.79 per capita
# 3 Connecticut: $3,237.66 per capita
# 4 New Jersey: $2,400.77 per capita
# 5 Minnesota: $2,022.95 per capita
# 6 Massachusetts: $2,002.49 per capita
# 7 Illinois: $1,997.66 per capita
# 8 New York: $1,988.82 per capita
# 9 Nebraska: $1,920.13 per capita
# 10 Rhode Island: $1,759.08 per capita
# 11 Washington: $1,695.47 per capita
# 12 Wyoming: $1,655.90 per capita
# 13 California: $1,623.54 per capita
# 14 Oklahoma: $1,621.54 per capita
# 15 Texas: $1,616.58 per capita
# 16 Maryland: $1,608.03 per capita
# 17 Nevada: $1,587.51 per capita
# 18 Virginia: $1,579.98 per capita
# 19 Arkansas: $1,552.51 per capita
# 20 Colorado: $1,540.83 per capita
# 21 Georgia: $1,504.27 per capita
# 22 Pennsylvania: $1,469.15 per capita
# 23 New Hampshire: $1,468.72 per capita
# 24 Ohio: $1,448.52 per capita
# 25 North Carolina: $1,418.82 per capita
# 26 Kansas: $1,355.68 per capita
# 27 Wisconsin: $1,331.49 per capita
# 28 Missouri: $1,300.45 per capita
# 29 Alaska: $1,283.37 per capita
# 30 Florida: $1,254.96 per capita
# 31 Michigan: $1,231.53 per capita
# 32 Tennessee: $1,174.97 per capita
# 33 Hawaii: $1,144.66 per capita
# 34 Vermont: $1,130.90 per capita
# 35 Indiana: $1,099.68 per capita
# 36 Iowa: $1,059.36 per capita
# 37 Oregon: $1,041.25 per capita
# 38 Arizona: $1,021.36 per capita
# 39 Maine: $994.08 per capita
# 40 Alabama: $958.38 per capita
# 41 South Dakota: $936.27 per capita
# 42 North Dakota: $918.10 per capita
# 43 Kentucky: $889.39 per capita
# 44 Utah: $847.87 per capita
# 45 South Carolina: $829.04 per capita
# 46 Louisiana: $826.36 per capita
# 47 Montana: $764.91 per capita
# 48 Idaho: $750.90 per capita
# 49 New Mexico: $743.53 per capita
# 50 West Virginia: $709.91 per capita
# 51 Mississippi: $700.99 per capita
= 52 Puerto Rico: $0.00 per capita
= 52 Guam: $0.00 per capita
= 52 American Samoa: $0.00 per capita
= 52 US Virgin Islands: $0.00 per capita
Cost of the Military (per capita) statistics - states compared - State Master
Dad2three
Gold Member
#Obamaquester? They were for it before they were against it
The aim of the sequester was to make it an enforcement tool, equally painful for both Dems and the GOP. Big cuts in defense spending would terrify the right. Meanwhile, the prospect of cuts to government programs like education, childcare and the environment would pressure Dems to make a deal. Or so the thinking went.
The law that set the table for the sequester passed the House 269-161, with more Republicans voting in favor than against. In fact, 174 GOPers greenlighted it, compared to 66 who shot it down. On the left, 95 Dems voted for it and 95 voted against it. It passed in the Senate, 74-26. Of the 74 yes votes, 28 were from GOPers.
But, implausibly, today many Republicans are trying to pin the blame on Obama and the Dems—even though they voted for the sequester in the first place.
Several GOPers have even gone as far to create the hashtag #Obamaquester in effort to blame the commander-in-chief. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney has accused Republicans of “amnesia” over the bill many GOPers once supported. Surprisingly, even Rep Justin Amash, R-Mich., has said it’s a mistake by Republicans to lay fault at Obama’s feet.
“It’s totally disingenuous,” he told Buzzfeed. “The debt ceiling deal in 2011 was agreed to by Republicans and Democrats. And regardless of who came up with the sequester, they all voted for it.”
#Obamaquester? They were for it before they were against it
LOL
Dad2three
Gold Member
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Well Bubs, since YOU claimed he said it at sequester, how about with six months either way Bubs, IN CONTEXT? lol
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #54
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Well Bubs, since YOU claimed he said it at sequester, how about with six months either way Bubs, IN CONTEXT? lol
I made no such claim, you lie, and continue to lie... check my posts and see if I said No TAXES at sequester!....Moron!
Dad2three
Gold Member
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Well Bubs, since YOU claimed he said it at sequester, how about with six months either way Bubs, IN CONTEXT? lol
I made no such claim, you lie, and continue to lie... check my posts and see if I said No TAXES at sequester!....Moron!
Sorry Bubba, all you dumbfukks are alike to me.
the other moronic poster POSITED THIS
"Go to Obama, who under Sequester promised to make cuts and NO NEW TAXES...................."
YOU JUST HAPPEN TO BE IGNORANT ENOUGH TO TO NOT SEE IT!
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #56
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Well Bubs, since YOU claimed he said it at sequester, how about with six months either way Bubs, IN CONTEXT? lol
I made no such claim, you lie, and continue to lie... check my posts and see if I said No TAXES at sequester!....Moron!
Sorry Bubba, all you dumbfukks are alike to me.
the other moronic poster POSITED THIS
"Go to Obama, who under Sequester promised to make cuts and NO NEW TAXES...................."
YOU JUST HAPPEN TO BE IGNORANT ENOUGH TO TO NOT SEE IT!
Did the Manchurian muslim in 2008 DECLARE NO NEW TAXES, and did he put any caveats on that statement?...... I just bitch slapped you again, you fucking Commie piece of shit, and you OCD on sequester, when THAT DOESN'T MATTER as he PROMISED NO NEW TAXES.... just one of HUNDREDS of broken promises of the fucking DemocRATS that LIE and have fucking retards like you spout your ridiculous shit! But you sure made yourself look as DUMB as you really are!
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #57
I guess his pledge for NO NEW TAXES at ANY TIME not just sequester doesn't count..... I can't believe how many of these belong to the DemocRAT party....
A campaign pledge in 2008 AFTER Dubya gutted revenues to Korean war levels, while the economy WAS in the tank? lol
Thanks for proving however, YOU are a liar when positing Obama pledged no new taxes with sequester!
Was there a TIME LIMIT spoken about here? And you are so stupid you have to bring up BLAME BUSH again, as you have been bitch slapped for being a retard, and have no legitimate answer to his NO NEW TAXES pledge?
You're DNC paycheck is going to be reduced because you made DemocRATS look like assholes with that "BLAME BUSH" shit again....almost 7 YEARS now, and you idiots still have to blame Bush.... Pathetic, but then again when YOU DemocRATS have a lying, Murderous, corrupt BITCH as your CHOICE for a president, and a fucking idiot Socialist has her beaten by 9 POINTS in the latest poll today from N.H., I guess frustration has set in..... Run with it baby, you are entertaining!
Well Bubs, since YOU claimed he said it at sequester, how about with six months either way Bubs, IN CONTEXT? lol
I made no such claim, you lie, and continue to lie... check my posts and see if I said No TAXES at sequester!....Moron!
Sorry Bubba, all you dumbfukks are alike to me.
the other moronic poster POSITED THIS
"Go to Obama, who under Sequester promised to make cuts and NO NEW TAXES...................."
YOU JUST HAPPEN TO BE IGNORANT ENOUGH TO TO NOT SEE IT!
I said I, as in ME, made no such claim, and you come back with "the other moronic poster POSITED THIS".... SO you LIED and then go ahead and confirm it..... Good thing I didn't POSITED it, or I would look like a liar and jackass, instead of YOU BEING a liar, and jackass.... Hard to make this shit up, but VERY ENTERTAINING!
for spreading LIES!!!!BOOKMARKED for use to show you're a liar, and a really dumb ass in future confrontations!
Last edited:
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,531
- 2,165
- Banned
- #58
Then cut outsourcing of quartermaster and combat support services to private firms and return them to military control: it will be better service at less cost.
Dad2three
Gold Member
Dad2three
Gold Member
I said I, as in ME, made no such claim, and you come back with "the other moronic poster POSITED THIS".... SO you LIED and then go ahead and confirm it..... Good thing I didn't POSITED it, or I would look like a liar and jackass, instead of YOU BEING a liar, and jackass.... Hard to make this shit up, but VERY ENTERTAINING!
BOOKMARKED for use to show you're a liar, and a really dumb ass in future confrontations!
Weird, admitting I made a mistake, since you cut into another conversation where a poster posited Obama made the p[ledge at the sequester, is lying? *shaking head*
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP BUBBA!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
The GOP, Trump, and Musk enjoy the deaths of children.
- Started by Old Rocks
- Replies: 1
-
CNN's Harry Enten Flabbergasted by Brutal New Numbers for Dems on Economy- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 4
-
