thanatos144
Gold Member
I dont support the murder of over 50 million innocent babies.....No mater what.
Republicans Show Their True Colors
- Thread starter midcan5
- Start date
thanatos144
Gold Member
CHAMPION really? The GOP should stop trying to meddle in people's sex lives and start championing liberty and privacy... You know, CHAMPION the Constitution...
No one wants to meddle in people's sex lives..But when we taxpayers are paying to end the consequences of your SEX lives (abortions) which ISN'T in the Constitution, I think WE HAVE A SAY
OUTLAWING abortion amounts to Government regulation of pregnancy...
Sexual reproduction is a private medical decision and the Constitution holds, at the very least, first trimester privacy rights. As Citizens, we hold those rights in common.
Some religions don't believe in chemotherapy either, for example, but we certainly don't let them dictate funding entanglements for private medical procedures...
Hey genius who is trying to outlaw it???? Your lies are getting old. As much as I think it is murder NO REPRESENTATIVE in the country is trying to overturn the supreme courts stupidity. No but asking ME to pay for you to kill a baby is going too ******* far! Asking me to pay for you being a slut is going to far as well....Pay for your own baby killing and birth control!
naturegirl
Gold Member
No one wants to meddle in people's sex lives..But when we taxpayers are paying to end the consequences of your SEX lives (abortions) which ISN'T in the Constitution, I think WE HAVE A SAY
OUTLAWING abortion amounts to Government regulation of pregnancy...
Sexual reproduction is a private medical decision and the Constitution holds, at the very least, first trimester privacy rights. As Citizens, we hold those rights in common.
Some religions don't believe in chemotherapy either, for example, but we certainly don't let them dictate funding entanglements for private medical procedures...
Still waiting for the SCOTUS link where it says I have to pay for your abortion.
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
thanatos144
Gold Member
Educate yourself you ignorant fool....Not paying for abortion is not overturning it you stupid hack. The right step is to overturn Roe cause it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL..... .. But dont worry you will still be able to murder your babies.
Last edited:
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 83,105
- 75,902
- 3,605
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #48
So now instead of blaming Bush we've moved on to blaming Reagan?
Weak
Obama has been a complete failure. Everything he touches goes to shit
thanatos144
Gold Member
Oh you mean the two men the ADMINISTRATION let go cause they were black?
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #50
They do indeed represent the WHOLE black panther party.
Dumbass
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
Educate yourself you ignorant fool....Not paying for abortion is not overturning it you stupid hack. The right step is to overturn Roe cause it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL..... .. But dont worry you will still be able to murder your babies.
You claimed no one is trying to outlaw or overturn...You are wrong and you know it, so you are the one who's lying here...
Roe v Wade was UNconstitutional???
Au contraire!3. State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term. Pp. 147-164.
(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician. Pp. 163, 164.
(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health. Pp. 163, 164.
(c) For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. Pp. 163-164; 164-165.
4. The State may define the term "physician" to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined. P. 165.
5. It is unnecessary to decide the injunctive relief issue, since the Texas authorities will doubtless fully recognize the Court's ruling [p115] that the Texas criminal abortion statutes are unconstitutional. P. 166.
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., post, p. 207, DOUGLAS, J., post, p. 209, and STEWART, J., post, p. 167, filed concurring opinions. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, J., joined, post, p. 221. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 171. [p116]
Roe v. Wade
thanatos144
Gold Member
Bullshit.
Educate yourself you ignorant fool....Not paying for abortion is not overturning it you stupid hack. The right step is to overturn Roe cause it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL..... .. But dont worry you will still be able to murder your babies.
You claimed no one is trying to outlaw or overturn...You are wrong and you know it, so you are the one who's lying here...
Roe v Wade was UNconstitutional???
3. State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term. Pp. 147-164.
(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician. Pp. 163, 164.
(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health. Pp. 163, 164.
(c) For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. Pp. 163-164; 164-165.
4. The State may define the term "physician" to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined. P. 165.
5. It is unnecessary to decide the injunctive relief issue, since the Texas authorities will doubtless fully recognize the Court's ruling [p115] that the Texas criminal abortion statutes are unconstitutional. P. 166.
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., post, p. 207, DOUGLAS, J., post, p. 209, and STEWART, J., post, p. 167, filed concurring opinions. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, J., joined, post, p. 221. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 171. [p116]
Roe v. Wade
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
We as citizens hold our rights in common and in Roe V Wade SCOTUS upheld our right to privacy in reproductive choice. Since our Government is by the people for the people with a guaranteed separation of Church and State, you would have to show that it is UNconstitutional for the Government to have entanglements with Citizen health insurance that is within legal medical standards...
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
Bullshit.
You claimed no one is trying to outlaw or overturn...You are wrong and you know it, so you are the one who's lying here...
Roe v Wade was UNconstitutional???
3. State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term. Pp. 147-164.
(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician. Pp. 163, 164.
(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health. Pp. 163, 164.
(c) For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. Pp. 163-164; 164-165.
4. The State may define the term "physician" to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined. P. 165.
5. It is unnecessary to decide the injunctive relief issue, since the Texas authorities will doubtless fully recognize the Court's ruling [p115] that the Texas criminal abortion statutes are unconstitutional. P. 166.
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, and POWELL, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., post, p. 207, DOUGLAS, J., post, p. 209, and STEWART, J., post, p. 167, filed concurring opinions. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, J., joined, post, p. 221. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 171. [p116]
Roe v. Wade
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Your going to need more paint for that broad brush of yours.
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 83,105
- 75,902
- 3,605
Correct! They are the only members.
They do indeed represent the WHOLE black panther party.
Dumbass
But they hardly represent the Democratic Party.
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,078
- 1,130
What if, the sitution is actually reversed?
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,330
- 20,753
- 2,290
No but the democratic party represents them..Correct! They are the only members.You mean like this?
Dumbass.
They do indeed represent the WHOLE black panther party.
Dumbass
But they hardly represent the Democratic Party.
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #60
Correct! They are the only members.You mean like this?
Dumbass.
They do indeed represent the WHOLE black panther party.
Dumbass
But they hardly represent the Democratic Party.
They do just as much as someone who may or may not have thrown peanuts represents the GOP.
Stupid ******* troll
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Did anyone bother to watch the NASCAR race yesterday on HBO/MAX?- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 0
-
Israel struck the Moscow imperial Cultural Center in Lebanon—almost completely destroyed.- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
Trump said he ended the Congo-Rwanda war. He lied: Washington Post.- Started by Conservative from Georgia
- Replies: 8
-
-
