Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

DOJ rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal in SCOTUS ...​

1752572938513.webp
Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › doj-rejects-ghislai...
12 hours ago — The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to deny Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghilaine Maxwell's appeal of her sex-trafficking conviction, a move that comes as the department has recently come under fire for its handling of Epstein’s case files.


Protecting Trump..................Again.
 
View attachment 1136438


So, all but two Republicans voted to not release the Epstein list which DOESN'T EXIST. Hmmm... that's a little strange. If it doesn't exist, then you can release it.

Doesn't say anything about a list, dumbass. It's like Democrats can't speak or read English.
 
Lies and perversions and corruption and pedophilia are not based on political ideology. It's across the board.

At what point do we wake up and realize our political "system" has to be fixed?

Public pressure needs to increase on this.

Democrats promote and endorse teaching sexual perversions and extreme sexual mutilations to school children. In fact the whole 'gay rights' hoax was founded by pedophiles. Marxists love promoting pedophiles as 'normal', and publish articles advocating support for kiddie raping gangs like NAMBLA.
"Progressives' especially love the kind of degenerates who promote gangs like NAMBLA.

At what point to do you even try to tell the truth about anything? Never.
 
I thought there was no list.
Associates list is not a list of criminal activity, they'd have to sift through the names and find evidence of Epstein like behavior and credible witnesses that weren't blackmailing the billionaires, which even if true would taint the case. There were lots of holes in the stories and Dershewitz pointed them out in their emails.
The 2 kingpins got arrested and only the third had testified witness and a picture posing with wthat means nothing in regards to evidence, but they got caught in a few lies like I think I remember years back they verified her age was 17 not 15. Would you arrest an ally foreign dignatary royal who has diplomatic immunity on a picture posing with a 17 year old or just ban him from the country and take away privileges if you assumed him guilty of something?
The AG is like the DA requiring enough evidence to prosecute, if people are affraid of the Clintons, they are not gonna testify.
Look at law and order as an example, the law enforcement and investigators always at odds with the DA requiring them to bring cases that are solid and can be prosecuted, in this case Billionaires can make it harder and leave eggs on the face of the prosecuting attorneys and then counter with defamation suits just in releasing the associates names.
Those online lists [you could tell ] were always fake news, conspiracies ran rampant and became a Mandella affect.
If you want to nab the Clintons, there are much easier cases to prosecute, with more evidence. Put together that list and formally request investigations.
The circle of people are the same.
Nobody got arrested for intimidation to obstruct and outright obstruction, nobody was arrested for seeking foreign help in interfering with our elections, Obama never got in trouble interfereing with Israeli elections, nobodyvwascarrested for vandelizing and stealing the border wall and aiding an invasion.
Nobody got arrested for using foreign spies to spy on political rivals then use that to manipulate the mid terms thus manipulating the 2 elections and controlling power in the gov't.
Nobody was arrested for filing false charges and abusing power including sweeping ethics complaints under the rug for collegues. Nobody was arrested for failing to recuse themselves, no perjury arrest for most of the liars who lied to get their positions including Garland.
Not many arrests for campaign finance fraud and the use of the MSM is a violation as their free propaganda spin(ads)= more $ than the alloted amount to donate.
 
Last edited:
Exactly what does anyone think will result in disclosing a "list"? This would have to result in criminal charges, it could be dragged out for 20 years, during which we would be under thumbscrews by the State until we give up. It would require giving all of previous and sitting congress people, the same with fbi and cia, the pentagon personnel, corporate heads, news people, give them all immunity and then try and give them some incentive to testify in court. The State ALSO has some very powerful incentive to offer them, remember. What are the odds of that happening? Get real. Have fun speculating, but don't get too wound up about it.

Unless of course Trump's name's on it, in which case it might lead to the President being forced to quit his job.

Pretty serious, especially when the person in charge of the list might be on the list.
 
Democrats promote and endorse teaching sexual perversions and extreme sexual mutilations to school children. In fact the whole 'gay rights' hoax was founded by pedophiles. Marxists love promoting pedophiles as 'normal', and publish articles advocating support for kiddie raping gangs like NAMBLA.
"Progressives' especially love the kind of degenerates who promote gangs like NAMBLA.

At what point to do you even try to tell the truth about anything? Never.
Yeah, only Democrats are into lies, perversions, corruption and pedophilia.

Holy crap, I have no doubt that a Trumpster would seriously think that.
 
Unless of course Trump's name's on it, in which case it might lead to the President being forced to quit his job.

Pretty serious, especially when the person in charge of the list might be on the list.
The problem with this kind of thinking is that whatever course is taken by the State would be to selectively use any prosecution to advance its goals and further intimidate their trained seals in government. You assume too much and ignore the reality of the situation we find ourselves in. Fear not, you will be given something to reassure your confidence that "the system worked". How many times have you heard that?
 
There you go. Republicans proving they care more about Trump than law & order. More than exposing the lying, corruption and even the elite pedophiles to justice.


Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

This is interesting. The government has had those files for years now, and only NOW are you complaining that it doesn't want to release them.

Food for thought.
 
Yeah, only Democrats are into lies, perversions, corruption and pedophilia.

Holy crap, I have no doubt that a Trumpster would seriously think that.

Already posted the facts of those actions many times; your lack of a memory doesn't have any affect on that. Lay off the dope and maybe you might save a few brain cells.
 
Just telling would create a bigger problem with no solution. If it is a matter of sex and drugs or along those lines, exposing it without the ability to prosecute any crimes is slander. The government and the people lose in that case.

That's what I've been saying all along, they can't release this information unless they have enough to prosecute people. and they most likely don't. Where are all the women involved? They're certainly quiet and well paid to stay that way would be my guess.
 
There you go. Republicans proving they care more about Trump than law & order. More than exposing the lying, corruption and even the elite pedophiles to justice.


Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

Boo Hoo
 
Both parties are insanely corrupt and do not represent the people. Why is this so hard to understand that both absolutely suck?
All people are imperfect. A higher percentage of Republicans at least try to spew that there is a moral compass. It does not mean that some do not follow what they spew and that there is not ineptitude and incompetence either.
 
15th post
That's what I've been saying all along, they can't release this information unless they have enough to prosecute people.
Of course they can. Don’t be simple.
 
Unless of course Trump's name's on it, in which case it might lead to the President being forced to quit his job.

Pretty serious, especially when the person in charge of the list might be on the list.

Wasn't that so nice of the Biden admin to shield and protect Trump the 4 years they were in charge of the Epstein files?? :auiqs.jpg:
 
That's what I've been saying all along, they can't release this information unless they have enough to prosecute people. and they most likely don't. Where are all the women involved? They're certainly quiet and well paid to stay that way would be my guess.

They would be getting million dollar interview and book offers, and be on every talking head show on the planet by now if there was as much to this as the gossip mongers and conspiracy buffs hope there is. Even Obama's embedded FBI agents would be quitting and shooting for a very cushy retirement by now as well, especially if they had anything on Trump.
 
Unless of course Trump's name's on it, in which case it might lead to the President being forced to quit his job.

Pretty serious, especially when the person in charge of the list might be on the list.
I've seen quite a few videos of Trumpsters who aren't buying his bullshit on this, and they're definitely pissed off and challenging him.

BUT, I haven't yet seen any of them wonder, "what ELSE have you lied to us about?" That's the BIG question. They need to go down THAT road honestly before the light finally goes on.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom