Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!

[Slyhunter]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

 

[Dad2three]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

Defender of free expression? You mean the GOP's defending that flag that fired on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THE ONE THE GUY WHO KILLED ABE FOUGHT FOR? lol

Sorry you Klowns don't get to hang a SYMBOL of hate, that was brought out when the PROGRESSIVES were fighting for CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL while the CONServatives CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa were trying to suppress the black man, AT LEAST NOT ON STATE PROPERTY!!!

 

[peach174]

"Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!"

They're certainly wrong about a Muslim becoming president.

So you support Sharia Law?
Because that is what they are talking about.

 

[Dad2three]

"Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!"

They're certainly wrong about a Muslim becoming president.

So you support Sharia Law?
Because that is what they are talking about.

Stupid moron, no they are not!

 

[peach174]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

 

[peach174]

"Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!"

They're certainly wrong about a Muslim becoming president.

So you support Sharia Law?
Because that is what they are talking about.

Stupid moron, no they are not!

Yes they are brain dead robot.

 

[Faun]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

Hong Kong is pretty far down in that list.

The 30 Most Prosperous Countries In The World - Business Insider

 

[Dad2three]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

So GUTTING tax rates from 70% to 28% wasn't supply side? How about the gutting of EFFECTIVE rates the top 1/10th of 1% of US paid 1932-1980 from 60%-70% to 20%-25%?


HONG KONG? Oh right that nation that subsidizes 40% of their population in housing, that is nothing more than a Banksters paradise!

 

[peach174]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

So GUTTING tax rates from 70% to 28% wasn't supply side? How about the gutting of EFFECTIVE rates the top 1/10th of 1% of US paid 1932-1980 from 60%-70% to 20%-25%?


HONG KONG? Oh right that nation that subsidizes 40% of their population in housing, that is nothing more than a Banksters paradise!

It's called economic freedom and it works.

 

[Faun]

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

So GUTTING tax rates from 70% to 28% wasn't supply side? How about the gutting of EFFECTIVE rates the top 1/10th of 1% of US paid 1932-1980 from 60%-70% to 20%-25%?


HONG KONG? Oh right that nation that subsidizes 40% of their population in housing, that is nothing more than a Banksters paradise!

It's called economic freedom and it works.

Not as well as the U.S.

 

[Dad2three]

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

So GUTTING tax rates from 70% to 28% wasn't supply side? How about the gutting of EFFECTIVE rates the top 1/10th of 1% of US paid 1932-1980 from 60%-70% to 20%-25%?


HONG KONG? Oh right that nation that subsidizes 40% of their population in housing, that is nothing more than a Banksters paradise!

It's called economic freedom and it works.

Sure Bubs, IF you consider the Gov't in HK subsidizing 40% of homes there as a "success", and a HUGE percentage of their pop living in abject poverty a "success"

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!


When liberals lose enough arguments (and especially elections) to conservatives, they usually start calling pissing and moaning and telling lies about the conservatives like this.

It's been happening a lot recently, as the Democrat party goes down the tubes (lost Congressional majorities, lost governorships, unable to find any viable candidates for President).

Care to give ONE policy GOPers gave US that worked as promised or was on the right side of history the past 40 years? lol


HOW ABOUT ONE POLICY EVER CONS WERE ON THE CORRECT SIDE OF US HISTORY? OOPS

They freed the slaves, gave voting rights to women and blacks. etc.

Oh you are an IGNORANT Tool that wants to conflate IDEOLOGY (CONservative) with PARTY (GOP)?? Seriously?

Sure, it's the GOP of today who support the CONfederate Flag as "heritage not hate" that were the PROGRESSIVES WHO FOUGHT THE CONservative CONfederate States of AmerriKKKa? Today's GOP base?

Hint it was LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES WHO DID THAT DUMMY!

It was Democrats who fought to keep slaves. It was Democrats who rioted to keep blacks out of their schools. It was Democrats who tried to filibusterer to keep the government from giving blacks equal rights led by Al Gore's father.
And you say I'm the dummy.

No.

Conservatives owned slaved, were against women's rights, including the vote. Just as it is today.

Liberals founded the country, fought for independence while conservatives spied for England.

At one time, Repubs were indeed the part of liberal and progressive policies but they are not now. The parties have changed positions and RWs know it.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

What has that got to do with growth?

Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Supply-Side Economics has barely been tried for anyone to either prove or disprove.
Supply-Side Economics is often confused or compared with Trickle-Down Economics which has also never been tried and does not exist.
Supply-Side economics has been tried in very few parts of the Earth.
If you really want a good example, take a look at Hong Kong. It's practically the lowest taxed country in the world and had pretty much taken a stance of non-interventionism/non-protectionism on almost every sector of their economy and it is considered one of the most prosperous countries in the world with a very high standard of living.

Supply side economics is made up by the Democrats to discredit economic freedom.

So GUTTING tax rates from 70% to 28% wasn't supply side? How about the gutting of EFFECTIVE rates the top 1/10th of 1% of US paid 1932-1980 from 60%-70% to 20%-25%?


HONG KONG? Oh right that nation that subsidizes 40% of their population in housing, that is nothing more than a Banksters paradise!

It's called economic freedom and it works.

 

[Slyhunter]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

Defender of free expression? You mean the GOP's defending that flag that fired on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THE ONE THE GUY WHO KILLED ABE FOUGHT FOR? lol

Sorry you Klowns don't get to hang a SYMBOL of hate, that was brought out when the PROGRESSIVES were fighting for CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL while the CONServatives CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa were trying to suppress the black man, AT LEAST NOT ON STATE PROPERTY!!!

So you believe in inventing your own history and tyranny. Sounds like a communist to me.

 

[Slyhunter]

"Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!"

They're certainly wrong about a Muslim becoming president.

So you support Sharia Law?
Because that is what they are talking about.

Stupid moron, no they are not!

Is there any such thing as a smart moron?

 

[Slyhunter]

Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!


When liberals lose enough arguments (and especially elections) to conservatives, they usually start calling pissing and moaning and telling lies about the conservatives like this.

It's been happening a lot recently, as the Democrat party goes down the tubes (lost Congressional majorities, lost governorships, unable to find any viable candidates for President).

Care to give ONE policy GOPers gave US that worked as promised or was on the right side of history the past 40 years? lol


HOW ABOUT ONE POLICY EVER CONS WERE ON THE CORRECT SIDE OF US HISTORY? OOPS

They freed the slaves, gave voting rights to women and blacks. etc.

Oh you are an IGNORANT Tool that wants to conflate IDEOLOGY (CONservative) with PARTY (GOP)?? Seriously?

Sure, it's the GOP of today who support the CONfederate Flag as "heritage not hate" that were the PROGRESSIVES WHO FOUGHT THE CONservative CONfederate States of AmerriKKKa? Today's GOP base?

Hint it was LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES WHO DID THAT DUMMY!

It was Democrats who fought to keep slaves. It was Democrats who rioted to keep blacks out of their schools. It was Democrats who tried to filibusterer to keep the government from giving blacks equal rights led by Al Gore's father.
And you say I'm the dummy.

No.

Conservatives owned slaved, were against women's rights, including the vote. Just as it is today.

Liberals founded the country, fought for independence while conservatives spied for England.

At one time, Repubs were indeed the part of liberal and progressive policies but they are not now. The parties have changed positions and RWs know it.

Bullshit

 

[Dad2three]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

Defender of free expression? You mean the GOP's defending that flag that fired on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THE ONE THE GUY WHO KILLED ABE FOUGHT FOR? lol

Sorry you Klowns don't get to hang a SYMBOL of hate, that was brought out when the PROGRESSIVES were fighting for CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL while the CONServatives CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa were trying to suppress the black man, AT LEAST NOT ON STATE PROPERTY!!!

So you believe in inventing your own history and tyranny. Sounds like a communist to me.

Tyranny is saying the CONservatives symbol of hatred shouldn't be on PUBLIC property is bad? lol

 

[Dad2three]

Care to give ONE policy GOPers gave US that worked as promised or was on the right side of history the past 40 years? lol


HOW ABOUT ONE POLICY EVER CONS WERE ON THE CORRECT SIDE OF US HISTORY? OOPS

They freed the slaves, gave voting rights to women and blacks. etc.

Oh you are an IGNORANT Tool that wants to conflate IDEOLOGY (CONservative) with PARTY (GOP)?? Seriously?

Sure, it's the GOP of today who support the CONfederate Flag as "heritage not hate" that were the PROGRESSIVES WHO FOUGHT THE CONservative CONfederate States of AmerriKKKa? Today's GOP base?

Hint it was LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES WHO DID THAT DUMMY!

It was Democrats who fought to keep slaves. It was Democrats who rioted to keep blacks out of their schools. It was Democrats who tried to filibusterer to keep the government from giving blacks equal rights led by Al Gore's father.
And you say I'm the dummy.

No.

Conservatives owned slaved, were against women's rights, including the vote. Just as it is today.

Liberals founded the country, fought for independence while conservatives spied for England.

At one time, Repubs were indeed the part of liberal and progressive policies but they are not now. The parties have changed positions and RWs know it.

Bullshit

Ah yes, we forgot, Rushblo and the right mindset were the type that were fighting FOR civil rights? It was the loony left that wanted to keep the CONfederate CONservative States of AmeriKKKa "liberal"??? lol

 

[Slyhunter]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

Defender of free expression? You mean the GOP's defending that flag that fired on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THE ONE THE GUY WHO KILLED ABE FOUGHT FOR? lol

Sorry you Klowns don't get to hang a SYMBOL of hate, that was brought out when the PROGRESSIVES were fighting for CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL while the CONServatives CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa were trying to suppress the black man, AT LEAST NOT ON STATE PROPERTY!!!

So you believe in inventing your own history and tyranny. Sounds like a communist to me.

Tyranny is saying the CONservatives symbol of hatred shouldn't be on PUBLIC property is bad? lol

Restricting free speech is tyranny.

 

[Dad2three]

Speaking of which there is nothing wrong with being defender of free expression. Everything wrong with stifling those who disagree with you by trying to outlaw their symbols. It is the Democrats who try to stifle free speech.

Defender of free expression? You mean the GOP's defending that flag that fired on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THE ONE THE GUY WHO KILLED ABE FOUGHT FOR? lol

Sorry you Klowns don't get to hang a SYMBOL of hate, that was brought out when the PROGRESSIVES were fighting for CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL while the CONServatives CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa were trying to suppress the black man, AT LEAST NOT ON STATE PROPERTY!!!

So you believe in inventing your own history and tyranny. Sounds like a communist to me.

Tyranny is saying the CONservatives symbol of hatred shouldn't be on PUBLIC property is bad? lol

Restricting free speech is tyranny.

Oh right, GOV'T not allowing the TRAITOROUS REBEL FLAG ON GOV'T BUILDINGS, IS "RESTRICTING FREE SPEECH"? LOL