Unlike those of the lower IQ variety, I don't have to step in the bullshit, nor do I need to pick it up and give it the ol' sniff test or feel it's texture. I don't need a quorum of alleged "experts" to reach a consensus to validate what I already know. It's called "discernment" and once someone gets past the blatant attempt to pull at one's heart strings and view an event objectively?
But, guy, that's not what you do.
You are given two possibilities.
1) A crazy person stole his mother's guns and shot up a bunch of kids.
or
2) A state agency scheduled a drill, that is somehow mistaken for a real event, and thousands of residents, first responders, journalists and public officials ALL GET IN on the deception to, um, achieve something, I guess. (YOu never really are clear on what the "Sandy Hoax" hoaxsters were trying to accomplish, exactly.) And years later, not a one of them has broken bad or outed the operations, but the fringe characters who promoted it, when sued, admit they were making up bullshit. Even people who would benefit from exposing the hoax, like the NRA, don't out it.
Why of course, being a discerning individual, you go with #2. because that's the crazy theory and it makes you feel better than you know some secret truth.
I am "small time" in the great big scheme of things and if I was ever granted a large audience for any length of time? They would shut me down. I proved that James Alefantis
You haven't really proven anything... You are just a vile man who repeats lies other people have come up with like you know something. Whether it is because someone is paying you to do so or because you are truly mentally ill, I can't tell.