Republican Poll Watchers Blocked From Duty In Multiple Pennsylvania Counties

1730840602455.webp
 
Brace yourself there will be a lot more election fraud stupidity coming from Trumpers as the night progresses.
The cheating is going on right in front of you. Are you that uninformed or just that stupid?
 
But you NEVER provide PROOF.

Saying it's "Obvious" doesn't count, even though you've been trying this tactic for 9 years.
The proof is right in front of you. You can plainly see the trouble Republican counties are having. Reality.
 
The cheating is going on right in front of you. Are you that uninformed or just that stupid?
The trouble with you is that you are a sheep. You buy any Trumpist trash that comes your way regarding the election fraud lie.

Use what is left of your brain instead of believing any of the garbage coming from right-wing tweets or Trump's mouth.
 
LOl.. Coming from the biggest and most moronic poster on this forum.

The trouble with you is that you are a sheep. You buy any Trumpist trash that comes your way regarding election fraud.

Use what is left of your brain instead of believing any of the garbage coming from right-wing tweets or Trump's mouth.
:9:
 
Brace yourself there will be a lot more election fraud stupidity coming from Trumpers as the night progresses.
.


You bet! Suck it down, because you little leftist losers have created plenty of it!












.
 
The proof is right in front of you. You can plainly see the trouble Republican counties are having. Reality.
So show some ACTUAL Proof of some illegal immigrant ACTUALLY voting with this ITIN number.

Saying it can be done is NOT Proof.
Dear Lord.
If it's true, then SHOW it.
And what is this ITIN number?
Screenshot 2024-11-05 at 1.16.50 PM.webp


You see that line that reads....... You can only use your ITIN for tax reporting purposes.
 

What the hell? Can any Democrat explain or defend this?
Lara Trump was on a local radio show today and was asked about this. They were on it got court orders letting the GOP poll watchers do their. So this as been nipped in the bud as it were.
 
Lara Trump was on a local radio show today and was asked about this. They were on it got court orders letting the GOP poll watchers do their. So this as been nipped in the bud as it were.
.

They have tons of lawyers! And that's just the beginning.

Buckle up, buttercup.


.
 
Last edited:
It's there. Too bad you can't read. (Is this really the best level of debate you can muster? If you don't have an answer, it's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.
Were you born yesterday? This document and the Constitutional Amendment it created have existed since 1965, and I have read them a dozen times or more.


Sec. 8. Whenever an examiner is serving under this Act in any political subdivision, the Civil Service Commission may assign, at the request of the Attorney General, one or more persons, who may be officers of the United States, (1) to enter and attend at any place for holding an election in such subdivision for the purpose of observing whether persons who are entitled to vote are being permitted to vote, and (2) to enter and attend at any place for tabulating the votes cast at any election held in such subdivision for the purpose of observing whether votes cast by persons entitled to vote are being properly tabulated. Such persons so assigned shall report to an examiner appointed for such political subdivision, to the Attorney General, and if the appointment of examiners has been authorized pursuant to section 3(a), to the court. SEC. 9.

(a) Any challenge to a listing on an eligibility list prepared by an examiner shall be heard and determined by a hearing officer appointed by and responsible to the Civil Service Commission and under such rules as the Commission shall by regulation prescribe. Such challenge shall be entertained only if filed at such office within the State as the Civil Service Commission shall by regulation designate, and within ten days after the listing of the challenged person is made available for public inspection, and if supported by (1) the affidavits of at least two persons having personal knowledge of the facts constituting grounds for the challenge, and (2) a certification that a copy of the challenge and affidavits have been served by mail or in person upon the person challenged at his place of residence set out in the application. Such challenge shall be determined within fifteen days after it has been filed. A petition for review of the decision of the hearing officer may be filed in the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the person challenged resides within fifteen days after service of such decision by mail on the person petitioning for review but no decision of a hearing officer shall be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Any person listed shall be entitled and allowed to vote pending final determination by the hearing officer and by the court.

(b) The times, places, procedures, and form for application and listing pursuant to this Act and removals from the eligibility lists shall be prescribed by regulations promulgated by the Civil Service Commission and the Commission shall, after consultation with the Attorney General, instruct examiners concerning applicable State law not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to (1) the qualifications required for listing, and (2) loss of eligibility to vote.

(c) Upon the request of the applicant or the challenger or on its own motion the Civil Service Commission shall have the power to require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence relating to any matter pending before it under the authority of this section. In case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena, any district court of the United States or the United States court of any territory or possession, or the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or is domiciled or transacts business, or has appointed an agent for receipt of service of process, upon application by the Attorney General of the United States shall have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring such person to appear before the Commission or a hearing officer, there to produce pertinent, relevant, and nonprivileged documentary evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation, and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
 
15th post
THey were official, court ordered poll watchers. They were prevented from entering the buildings to do their jobs. It took the frigging lawyers taking action to get them in the buildings.

Your defense is that it never even happened? Really?
Why were they prevented? Who prevented them? Did they have, and show their official IDs as official poll watchers and someone still turned them away? Were they at the wrong entrance for employees? Was it security guards or election workers that did not let them in? Were they late? Were these 4 not let in, all at different polling places?

There's nothing in this story to explain what happened and why...?

Missing information;

Why did it happen?
Where exactly did it happen?
What actually did happen?
When did it happen?
How were they turned away and who turned them away?

Seems the only thing important to the writers is making you think something, something, something is wrong and crooked.....
 
Looks like the scanners suddenly started working when the Trump lawyers arrived.
 
Last edited:
So show some ACTUAL Proof of some illegal immigrant ACTUALLY voting with this ITIN number.

Saying it can be done is NOT Proof.
Dear Lord.
If it's true, then SHOW it.
And what is this ITIN number?
View attachment 1037118

You see that line that reads....... You can only use your ITIN for tax reporting purposes.
A forensic audit will find that. Forensic audits should not be a problem. Right? No fraud. Certainly nothing to hide.
 
A forensic audit will find that. Forensic audits should not be a problem. Right? No fraud. Certainly nothing to hide.
I swear, I really do, that you CLAIMED the same in 2020, but could NEVER provide a single Shred of Evidence.
Do you have it YET?

3-4 Explosive weeks, maybe?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom