Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 93,598
- 47,068
- 2,615
He did not. That’s been shown to be internet bullshit … that you still believeReally? Are you claiming Obama did not reference the fact that voting machines were controlled by the Democrats?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He did not. That’s been shown to be internet bullshit … that you still believeReally? Are you claiming Obama did not reference the fact that voting machines were controlled by the Democrats?
So Democrats deny Obama admitted the truthYou're done. You're posting nothing but nonsense now. AI dispelled your fake news. And Sydney Powell is a disgraced lawyer over her participation in the 2020 election.
View attachment 1270134
I have far more evidence of 2020 voter fraud than was brought up in the abbreviated congressional examination of fraud on Jan 6.2 states did that. What did you learn?
The failure of officials to resolutely prove or disprove voter fraud in the months shortly after the 2020 election is now being rectified by more extensive examinations of the evidence with new authority by investigators to force democrats to turn over evidence they have been hiding for years.How'd that turn out?
Arizona
- Official Testimony: Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers testified that he, along with other state officials, was intensely pressured by Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani to de-certify the state's legitimate electors, despite being repeatedly asked for and failing to receive any evidence of voter fraud.
- The "Fake Elector" Scheme: The committee showed evidence detailing how the Trump campaign organized fake slates of electoral college electors in Arizona (and six other states) in an attempt to subvert the official vote counts.
Pennsylvania
- Investigative Findings: Al Schmidt, the lone Republican City Commissioner in Philadelphia, testified that he investigated all claims of widespread voter fraud in Pennsylvania and found them to be completely baseless.
- Witness Tampering: The committee presented evidence that Pennsylvania lawmakers—such as Representative Scott Perry—were actively involved in introducing Trump's legal team to Department of Justice officials as part of a plot to substitute DOJ leadership and replace legitimate electors.
I see no justification for drawing so many speculative conclusions from such a vague statement.Like this.
“Proud Boys, stand back and stand by. But I’ll tell you what, I’ll tell you what, somebody’s got to do something about antifa and the left because this is not a right-wing problem.”
Here is just a small sample of the very limited presentations of a very tiny portion of evidence of 2020 fraud discussed by Congress on Jan 6:Nope. There was no evidence presented that day nor was there a mechanism to do so.
Objections could be raised (and voted down) that’s it
It was not “abbreviated “So Democrats deny Obama admitted the truth
I have far more evidence of 2020 voter fraud than was brought up in the abbreviated congressional examination of fraud on Jan 6.
Are you also claiming democrats did not control voting machines in 2008? What about in 2020? Should democrats be allowed to control voting machines in national elections and prevent the machines from being accesses by forensics examiners immediately following elections? No. Tina Peters was unjustly jailed by corrupt democrats angry at her for recording evidence of voting machine corruption in spite of democrat efforts to prevent any examinations of the corrupt machines after the 2020 election.He did not. That’s been shown to be internet bullshit … that you still believe
You claim I have no evidence but that is like falsely and unreasonably claiming there exists no evidence of 2020 voter fraud in spite of all evidence to the contrary. Here is from my files containing hundreds of credible reports of fraud that democrats have never irrefutably debunked:It was not “abbreviated “
It was not anything other than objections destined to be voted down
And you have nothing
It is true that democrats have successfully forced the deletion of most reports showing that video, but not this one:He did not. That’s been shown to be internet bullshit … that you still believe
Let me remind people that what was not discussed:It was not “abbreviated “
It was not anything other than objections destined to be voted down
And you have nothing
Ya know why that was not discussed?Let me remind people that what was not discussed:
1. Voting machines flipping votes.
2. Explanations for the missing chain of custody records for hundreds of thousands of late ballot dumps after the election.
3. Explanations for the missing computer images and logs.
4. Explanations for blocking observers at democrat election wards.
5. Explanations for the impossible statistical probability of massive boosts from after election ballot drops with hundreds of thousands of unverified ballots.
6. Immigration records proving illegals did not vote in massive numbers.
7. Widespread evidence of ballot box stuffing and vote harvesting.
And much more.
Democrats not only cannot disprove evidence of 2020 fraud but they want to make discussions of fraud off-limits in every venue they can.Ya know why that was not discussed?
Because that was not the place to do that.
And all of that had already been addressed as nauseum
It has been discussed for six ******* years stupidDemocrats not only cannot disprove evidence of 2020 fraud but they want to make discussions of fraud off-limits in every venue they can.
Prove he said it.So Democrats deny Obama admitted the truth
I'm sure you think you do.I have far more evidence of 2020 voter fraud than was brought up in the abbreviated congressional examination of fraud on Jan 6.
Still nothing.The failure of officials to resolutely prove or disprove voter fraud in the months shortly after the 2020 election is now being rectified by more extensive examinations of the evidence with new authority by investigators to force democrats to turn over evidence they have been hiding for years.
Maybe you don't but the Proud Boys sure did. They took it as a call to action to do something about the left, ordered by the president of the United States.I see no justification for drawing so many speculative conclusions from such a vague statement.
It is true that democrats have successfully forced the deletion of most reports showing that video, but not this one:
Sure they have. Like the claims suitcases of ballots pulled out from under a table to count them multiple times in Fulton county. Completely disproven. By Republicans no less.Democrats not only cannot disprove evidence of 2020 fraud but they want to make discussions of fraud off-limits in every venue they can.
Talking nonstop about how democrat looters and liars would never commit fraud in elections does not disprove the existing massive evidence of fraud.It has been discussed for six ******* years stupid
Prove he said it.