Rep. Ken Buck Calls for Investigation into 'Exploitation of Children' in Letter to DOJ

[John T. Ford]

I have seen excerpts...kids are grotesquely sexualized.

I couldn't imagine Kids Beauty Pageants being anything like this stuff Netflix is peddling as evidence by there never being the reaction to these pageants like we are seeing to this Netflix movie.

But, I'll just take your word for it.

View attachment 388767View attachment 388764View attachment 388765View attachment 388766View attachment 388768

There is no link or context to those pictures.

Only one actually appears to even resembling a kid beauty padgaent.

Again ....

If you think those pageants are bad .... I'll take your word for it.

But, they are completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

This thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands for the DOJ to investigate Netflix for peddling child porn and the producers of this film.

You want to talk about how bad you think Beauty Pageants are start then your own thread and stop trying to derail this one.

 

[Coyote]

No democrats?

They ought to investigate the child porn pageant industry.

I don't agree with those either but, to think they would be investigated as child porn is really dumb.

You don't agree with the promoters of the child porn movie but you think the investigation would be really dumb? Maybe dangerous to the democrat progressive movement?

That is just dumb, to imply child porn is part of any mainstream political movement.

Except we have real evidence of Dems doing just that.

Might want take a look at who you are supporting.

Bullshit.

 

[John T. Ford]

Bullshit.

Denial.

 

[Coyote]

I have seen excerpts...kids are grotesquely sexualized.

I couldn't imagine Kids Beauty Pageants being anything like this stuff Netflix is peddling as evidence by there never being the reaction to these pageants like we are seeing to this Netflix movie.

But, I'll just take your word for it.

View attachment 388767View attachment 388764View attachment 388765View attachment 388766View attachment 388768

There is no link or context to those pictures.

Only one actually appears to even resembling a kid beauty padgaent.

Again ....

If you think those pageants are bad .... I'll take your word for it.

But, they are completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

This thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands for the DOJ to investigate Netflix for peddling child porn and the producers of this film.

You want to talk about how bad you think Beauty Pageants are start then your own thread and stop trying to derail this one.

All I did was google sexualization, children, pageant. Do that and you will get the context.

I mistakenly thought you lot were concerned about the sexualization of children and child porn. Guess not.

 

[John T. Ford]

 

[John T. Ford]

All I did was google sexualization, children, pageant. Do that and you will get the context.

I mistakenly thought you lot were concerned about the sexualization of children and child porn. Guess not.

Again ...

The topic of this thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands that the DOJ investigate these pedophiles.

Your comments are aimed at derailing this thread with delusional bullshit.

No one in their right mind would support this kind of insanity.

Why would you attempt to derail this thread and prevent people from discussing this topic.

I find it disturbing that you would do that.

 

[Coyote]

All I did was google sexualization, children, pageant. Do that and you will get the context.

I mistakenly thought you lot were concerned about the sexualization of children and child porn. Guess not.

Again ...

The topic of this thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands that the DOJ investigate these pedophiles.

Your comments are aimed at derailing this thread with delusional bullshit.

I find it disturbing that you would do that.

Good grief. They aren’t pedophiles. Have you actually seen it? I haven’t. But I did look it up, and it is nothing compared to the ramped up sexuality of pageants.

But hey, who am I to ruin your QAnon delusions.

 

[John T. Ford]

Good grief. They aren’t pedophiles. Have you actually seen it? I haven’t. But I did look it up, and it is nothing compared to the ramped up sexuality of pageants.

But hey, who am I to ruin your QAnon delusions.

People that view child pornography are pedophiles.

Why do you defend them.

Lawmakers are demanding Netflix be investigated for what ....?

That's right .... child pornography.

You keep on parroting your delusional bullshit about beauty pageants.

Back here in the real world .... I am gonna watch for the DOJ to investigate these pedophiles for child pornography.

 

[Coyote]

Good grief. The fact that you focus on this show, but ignore other far more blatant examples of sexualizing children indicates that is not really what you care about at all.

 

[John T. Ford]

Good grief. The fact that you focus on this show, but ignore other far more blatant examples of sexualizing children indicates that is not really what you care about at all.

Again ...

The topic of this thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands that the DOJ investigate these pedophiles.

You are attempting to derail this thread and in the process are defending people that would look at this child pornography, as described by these lawmakers in Congress mentioned by name in the OP.

I find it very disturbing that someone would do that.

There is a reason Leftism is referred to as a Mental Disorder.

 

[John T. Ford]

 

[Lysistrata]

We live in a society that allows "beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" dresses to receive "purity rings" at an age when they don't know a damned thing about sex, "conservative" state lawmakers who openly refuse to raise the age of consent in their states because of some bizarre, unexplained thing about "family," and some "religious" men recommending that adult men get themselves some teenage female ass, on TV no less. Some people accept grown men trolling teenage girls. Alabama even has a pet pedophile in roy moore.

I didn't see "conservatives" complaining about all of this before. But OH! Wait! There's a MOVIE!

Either we take the subject of sexualization of girls seriously or we don't.

 

[John T. Ford]

We live in a society that allows "beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" dresses to receive "purity rings" at an age when they don't know a damned thing about sex, "conservative" state lawmakers who openly refuse to raise the age of consent in their states because of some bizarre, unexplained thing about "family," and some "religious" men recommending that adult men get themselves some teenage female ass, on TV no less. Some people accept grown men trolling teenage girls. Alabama even has a pet pedophile in roy moore.

I didn't see "conservatives" complaining about all of this before. But OH! Wait! There's a MOVIE!

Either we take the subject of sexualization of girls seriously or we don't.

Was Roy Moore ever convicted or even charged with anything related to underage girls?

That's right ..... he was not.

He was only accused by Leftist with political motives.

That comment alone shows just how disingenuous you are and that you are not to be taken seriously.

But, before dismissing you for being the disingenuous uninformed IDIOT that you are let me ask you this ....

All of that other delusional bullshit you mentioned above .... the beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" ....

Did any of that delusional shit get the attention of anyone?

Did lawmakers in Congress call on the DOJ to Investigate any of that psycho shit for any reason at all?

Your comment is just another clear example of how you Leftist clearly DO NOT live in reality.

 

[Lysistrata]

We live in a society that allows "beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" dresses to receive "purity rings" at an age when they don't know a damned thing about sex, "conservative" state lawmakers who openly refuse to raise the age of consent in their states because of some bizarre, unexplained thing about "family," and some "religious" men recommending that adult men get themselves some teenage female ass, on TV no less. Some people accept grown men trolling teenage girls. Alabama even has a pet pedophile in roy moore.

I didn't see "conservatives" complaining about all of this before. But OH! Wait! There's a MOVIE!

Either we take the subject of sexualization of girls seriously or we don't.

Was Roy Moore ever convicted or even charged with anything related to underage girls?

That's right ..... he was not.

He was only accused by Leftist with political motives.

That comment alone shows just how disingenuous you are and that you are not to be taken seriously.

But, before dismissing you for being the disingenuous uninformed IDIOT that you are let me ask you this ....

All of that other delusional bullshit you mentioned above .... the beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" ....

Did any of that delusional shit get the attention of anyone?

Did lawmakers in Congress call on the DOJ to Investigate any of that psycho shit for any reason at all?

Your comment is just another clear example of how you Leftist clearly DO NOT live in reality.

When has a right-wing politician in Alabama ever been charged with anything? Show that the girls, now women, who came forward to talk about moore's behavior toward them are "leftists" (whatever that means) with political motives. I don't think that you know even one of moore's accusers. I take it that you deny that girls are subjected to "beauty" pageants, brought up to think that showing off their bodies as "cheerleaders" is a good thing, and that "purity rings," not given to boys, represent how they should handle their sexuality, when they are in fact an early manipulation of sexuality that is intended as a display of the morally reprehensible double standard intended to teach girls to feel negatively about their own selves.

When I was a little kid, years before I knew anything about sex, they dressed me up in a white dress and even a white veil on my head like a woman getting married to go receive my first Christian communion. This is highly manipulative. Why dress up little girls like adult women doing adult things? We sexualize little girls much too much.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

I have seen excerpts...kids are grotesquely sexualized.

I couldn't imagine Kids Beauty Pageants being anything like this stuff Netflix is peddling as evidence by there never being the reaction to these pageants like we are seeing to this Netflix movie.

But, I'll just take your word for it.

View attachment 388767View attachment 388764View attachment 388765View attachment 388766View attachment 388768

There is no link or context to those pictures.

Only one actually appears to even resembling a kid beauty padgaent.

Again ....

If you think those pageants are bad .... I'll take your word for it.

But, they are completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

This thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands for the DOJ to investigate Netflix for peddling child porn and the producers of this film.

You want to talk about how bad you think Beauty Pageants are start then your own thread and stop trying to derail this one.

All I did was google sexualization, children, pageant. Do that and you will get the context.

I mistakenly thought you lot were concerned about the sexualization of children and child porn. Guess not.

Beauty pageants are not the subject of the thread, this one is about Netflix's overt peddling of smut that sexually objectifies little girls (and there is no two ways about the intended purpose behind that movie--it was unequivocally intended as sexual objectification of those adolescent girls). Speaking as a father of a young girl, I find that movie and the people behind its production to be downright disgusting.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Please, can even one of the people detracting from the subject of the OP watch this trailer and articulate a single defense of the scenes in this film showing 11 year-old girls wearing booty shorts and twerking? Come on, it's only 1:30 long, just watch it before sidelining the thread with endless whataboutisms in defense of Netflix.

This is absolutely obscene

 

[Lysistrata]

I have seen excerpts...kids are grotesquely sexualized.

I couldn't imagine Kids Beauty Pageants being anything like this stuff Netflix is peddling as evidence by there never being the reaction to these pageants like we are seeing to this Netflix movie.

But, I'll just take your word for it.

View attachment 388767View attachment 388764View attachment 388765View attachment 388766View attachment 388768

There is no link or context to those pictures.

Only one actually appears to even resembling a kid beauty padgaent.

Again ....

If you think those pageants are bad .... I'll take your word for it.

But, they are completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

This thread is about lawmakers moving forward with demands for the DOJ to investigate Netflix for peddling child porn and the producers of this film.

You want to talk about how bad you think Beauty Pageants are start then your own thread and stop trying to derail this one.

All I did was google sexualization, children, pageant. Do that and you will get the context.

I mistakenly thought you lot were concerned about the sexualization of children and child porn. Guess not.

Beauty pageants are not the subject of the thread, this one is about Netflix's overt peddling of smut that sexually objectifies little girls (and there is no two ways about the intended purpose behind that movie--it was unequivocally intended as sexual objectification of those adolescent girls). Speaking as a father of a young girl, I find that movie and the people behind its production to be downright disgusting.

Apparently you are afraid of a little context. We have to look at what is occurring in society as a whole in order to talk about this movie, which I haven't seen and don't plan to.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I suspect that none of these whiners have watched the film. That is usually the case with these dickheads.

It is telling that they dont want to discuss the issue in any context other than a film that they havent seen. A perfect metaphor for fake right wing outrage.

Hypocrisy on a biblical scale.

 

[John T. Ford]

Good grief. The fact that you focus on this show, but ignore other far more blatant examples of sexualizing children indicates that is not really what you care about at all.

The fact that you keep posting off topic delusional Bullshit is ALL REVEALING !!!

 

[John T. Ford]

We live in a society that allows "beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" dresses to receive "purity rings" at an age when they don't know a damned thing about sex, "conservative" state lawmakers who openly refuse to raise the age of consent in their states because of some bizarre, unexplained thing about "family," and some "religious" men recommending that adult men get themselves some teenage female ass, on TV no less. Some people accept grown men trolling teenage girls. Alabama even has a pet pedophile in roy moore.

I didn't see "conservatives" complaining about all of this before. But OH! Wait! There's a MOVIE!

Either we take the subject of sexualization of girls seriously or we don't.

Was Roy Moore ever convicted or even charged with anything related to underage girls?

That's right ..... he was not.

He was only accused by Leftist with political motives.

That comment alone shows just how disingenuous you are and that you are not to be taken seriously.

But, before dismissing you for being the disingenuous uninformed IDIOT that you are let me ask you this ....

All of that other delusional bullshit you mentioned above .... the beauty" pageants for little girls, scantily-clad girls as "cheerleaders" at high school football games doing "gymnastics," and "churches" parading little girls in white "virgin" ....

Did any of that delusional shit get the attention of anyone?

Did lawmakers in Congress call on the DOJ to Investigate any of that psycho shit for any reason at all?

Your comment is just another clear example of how you Leftist clearly DO NOT live in reality.

When has a right-wing politician in Alabama ever been charged with anything? Show that the girls, now women, who came forward to talk about moore's behavior toward them are "leftists" (whatever that means) with political motives. I don't think that you know even one of moore's accusers. I take it that you deny that girls are subjected to "beauty" pageants, brought up to think that showing off their bodies as "cheerleaders" is a good thing, and that "purity rings," not given to boys, represent how they should handle their sexuality, when they are in fact an early manipulation of sexuality that is intended as a display of the morally reprehensible double standard intended to teach girls to feel negatively about their own selves.

When I was a little kid, years before I knew anything about sex, they dressed me up in a white dress and even a white veil on my head like a woman getting married to go receive my first Christian communion. This is highly manipulative. Why dress up little girls like adult women doing adult things? We sexualize little girls much too much.

More psycho delusional bullshit.

You people truly do not Live in Reality.