j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
Another whining dud from Berg…He seems to be arguing that because FNC shaped their stories about Trump, that his preferred networks should be able to outright lie with immunity…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually the clueless democrat's 19% approval rating is all this is.Republicans are the party of snowflakes led by the biggest snowflake of them all OP. That's all this is.
Nope, somehow you missed the point. Either intentionally or because you are obtuse. That being, trump's extortion of CBS succeeded. He got some money for his library (should they call it that since he doesn't read?) and got a critic fired. It was all done right out in the open but your trumpian blinders prevented you from seeing the obvious. Not for the first time.Another whining dud from Berg…He seems to be arguing that because FNC shaped their stories about Trump, that his preferred networks should be able to outright lie with immunity…
I'm not a lawyer so I based my opinion on that of legal experts who said trump's suit was frivolous and he was destined to lose it. But CBS had bigger fish to fry, that being the merger. trump played his hand well. If you admire the kind of extortion autocrats use to get their way.You really believe 60 Minutes had a prayer of winning that lawsuit?
One might be correctYes I do. Most legal experts who have issued an opinion say CBS would have won the suit. The thing is, CBS has merger business pending before the regime so $15M was a reasonable price to pay to get it approved. One might call that extortion by Dotard.
Editing is completely common.You really believe 60 Minutes had a prayer of winning that lawsuit? It's obvious what they did. They edited the Harris interview so that she wouldn't look as stupid as she obviously is and they got caught doing it. They got off cheap with the settlement.
What we should be talking about here is the total lack of journalistic integrity that led 60 Minutes to do what they did. You can hate Trump. You can want Harris to beat him. But if you have even a dollop of journalistic integrity you can't do what 60 Minutes did!
Oh bullshit! You don't take someone's answer to a totally different question...remove her actual answer...then cut and paste the other answer in to make it look intelligent. What 60 Minutes did is beyond the pale and they know it. They would have lost that court case and they knew it.Editing is completely common.
Fox did so in a far more egregious manner.
This is about Trump threatening to hold up that merger.
Pure extortion
But then, that’s not what happenedOh bullshit! You don't take someone's answer to a totally different question...remove her actual answer...then cut and paste the other answer in to make it look intelligent. What 60 Minutes did is beyond the pale and they know it. They would have lost that court case and they knew it.
That's exactly what happened. You can cut portions of an interview out...you can't take portions of an interview and move them around to make it seem the person being interviewed said something different. That's what 60 Minutes did and that's what they got caught doing.But then, that’s not what happened
It was an insignificant edit.Oh bullshit! You don't take someone's answer to a totally different question...remove her actual answer...then cut and paste the other answer in to make it look intelligent. What 60 Minutes did is beyond the pale and they know it. They would have lost that court case and they knew it.
Naturally, the allegation lead to trump devotees similarly becoming quite agitated. Feeding off the whole "MSM is biased against trump" frenzy.
It's about as blatantly deceptive as I've ever seen, Berg. I can't believe that 60 Minutes stooped to it. If they really thought Harris was that bad in the interview (which they obviously did!) then they shouldn't have aired it at all.It was an insignificant edit.
From AI...........Legal experts widely criticized Paramount Global's decision to settle President Trump's lawsuit against "60 Minutes" for $16 million, arguing that the suit was baseless and the settlement a capitulation that undermines press freedom. Many believe CBS had a strong legal position and could have successfully defended itself in court. The settlement, they argue, sets a dangerous precedent, emboldening powerful individuals to target the media with frivolous lawsuits.
IRONY ALERT!You're a hack !
Why don't LIBs ever look at the shoe being on the other foot before they post crazy stuff ?
Oh yeah...that right facts don't matter to LIBs; only the agenda does.
View attachment 1140760
Then your judgement is compromised. Most likely by misinformation.It's about as blatantly deceptive as I've ever seen, Berg.
Prove itThat's exactly what happened. You can cut portions of an interview out...you can't take portions of an interview and move them around to make it seem the person being interviewed said something different. That's what 60 Minutes did and that's what they got caught doing.
Just using dems playbook…You bitches cry like children when your own tactics are used against you…Nope, somehow you missed the point. Either intentionally or because you are obtuse. That being, trump's extortion of CBS succeeded. He got some money for his library (should they call it that since he doesn't read?) and got a critic fired. It was all done right out in the open but your trumpian blinders prevented you from seeing the obvious. Not for the first time.
Yet, you keep responding…weird…More non specific word salad showing once again you have nothing.