On your side:
1) The technical, economic definition of a recession is generally 2 out of three quarters of negative growth.
Against you:
1) Zero nominal growth is negative real growth, so individuals are still clearly in a recession even if the whole economy technically isn't.
2) We plummeted a long way down and stayed at the bottom. If you tumble a hundred yards down a ravine, then walked 5 yards back up the other side, you'd still think of yourself as "in" the ravine, wouldn't you?
3) You need to get out more.
I said recently based on my businesses that September wasn't good. Your liberal buds mocked me how well the economy is coming along. Well, coming out now is that September numbers are bad. If you spent more time on the street living your life instead of in your liberal fantasy world, you'd be more aware of what's going on around you.
I believe what I see, you see what you believe.
You're an idiot. The bottom was losing about 6 to 800,000 jobs a month with GDP growth at -6%.
Are we there NOW?
Gaining 100K jobs a month when 400K are required to just absorb incoming workers and maintaining the unemployment rate? The only reason it's going down is people who are just giving up. And he's sustaining virtually zero economic growth and threatening not to renew the Bush tax cuts which even liberal economists predict will push us back into actual negative growth.
And you didn't understand my point on real versus nominal growth, did you? If there are 100 families in your town, and they average $50,000 a year in economic activity, then the size of the economy in your town is $5 Million.
If 10 more families move in, but the average economic activity per family drops to $48,000 a year then, the size of the economy in your town grows to roughly $5.3 million. The total economy grows, but the average family is poorer.
This is the new Obama economy, growth is so slow that even though it's technically going up, which was my point on the nominal size of the economy, it is not keeping pace with the per capita growth, which was my point on real growth.
You combine that with my ravine example, and you get to my point #3. Get out more, you'll get what I'm talking about.