It does get interesting reading the arguments made over the months and years:
1. Record heat somewhere? Global warming despite the fact that we have kept records for such a short time that on any given day there will be record heat somewhere on the planet.
2. Record cold somewhere? Either caused by global warming or irrelevent and lets ignore the fact that due to records being kept for such a short time, on any given day there will be record cold somewhere on the planet.
3. Arctic ice at record lows due to global warming? Never mind that records have only be kept of ice extent at the arctic for fewer than 40 years and therefore the record is not a really reliable estimate of what average arctic ice coverage is from one century to the next.
4. More hurricanes and/or devastating rains? Global warming.
5. Fewer hurricanes and/or devastating drought? Global warming.
6. A few millimeters rise in the ocean level? Global warming.
7. A few millimeters drop in the ocean level? Irrelevent or some after affect of global warming somewhere.
8. Scientists who say unequivocably that global warming is a serious problem are believed without question even when it is shown they have skewed data to support their position.
9. Scientists who question global warming are dismissed as incompetent, idiots, or pawns of the oil industry.
I could go on and on and on and on and ON in this vein, but I'm sure all get my drift. Whatever happens re the weather, the environment, the global climate, the AGW religionists will make it the result of global warming and they will reject any and all evidence to the contrary.
And given that fact, it is unlikely that any of us who think the verdict is still out don't have any means of making an argument that will convince them. It is as futile as trying to convince a dedicated flat Earther that their belief in science and history is flawed.