Regarding VP Harris Winning Over The Iowa Vote.

Dems are trying to RIG the election with a fake poll. Drive down election day turnout by claiming Harris has the state sewn up. NASTY Democrats do this every damn election the scumbags. There's no NASTY Dem trick they won't use to RIG elections.

If you wonder why Dems don't run on or even talk about the issues, it's because they rely on election RIGGING and CHEATING.
So, you think it's Democrat's fault that not enough MAGAs vote? Really?
 
We all know the state of sheer desperation & panic that the DNC crowd is currently trapped in. Desperation/panic brings out the best in both obnoxious & outright ludicrous predictions, statements & fantasies, which brings us to the current state of Iowa, "magically" making a whopping *21 point shift to the left literally overnight. I could go on & on but I am certainly not a professional(paid) political commentator so I will provide a link below to someone who IS a paid & respected professional political commentator, so folks can actually get the facts about the current state of affairs in the state of Iowa.

(*3:40 into the vid)


Iowa is indicative of Harris drawing the women's vote and especially the senior's (over 65) vote to her camp.
No way to take numbers on defecting MAGAt women....but this appears to be a factor as well....registered Republican women voting Dem.
The thing about Iowa voting demographics is that it historically has served as a bellweather for the national trend.
HUGE positive news for Harris' prospects in this election!
 
It is the most outlying poll this cycle and being the very curious person I am I have watched countless videos on this election.

Some have suggested that this outlier was intentionally dishonest because they want to try and drive artificial optimism and their supporters to the polls, others say it is to try and pretend it won't be a surprise if she wins.

I have watched many videos of random pollsters, and some have gone into great detail about the numbers and I sense some anger from them because they believe that some of pollsters are purposely inaccurate and it is a mark on their profession. Considering how wrong they have been for so long (remember the Reagan election where he was behind?), this is not good.

In terms of polls, the closest one I saw had Harris tied in two Swing States, winning one but losing the others and all the Sun States. That was her best showing if memory serves correct and she still loses when Trump hits over 290 in the E.C.

The most accurate pollster in 2020 and 2022 was AtlasIntel and they have Trump winning every Swing State and the only one she wins I believe was VA by less than a point and Wisc she was tied or something. He is predicting Trump hits 312 in the E.C.

Ramussen was the most accurate in 2016 and they also have Trump well ahead and winning the E.C going away.

This isn't my bias. Yes, I like many of his policies on China in particular. I'm not his biggest fan in regards to Ukraine, but, if it avoids WWIII and also settles Iran, China and N Korea down, we have to be smarter than we were in the past.

Either candidate will still offer more civil liberties and freedom than Canada does. I suspect Harris will win somehow. President Xi and their Axis will be ready when she does.
If Harris wins, our only hope is an assist by Russia, China or both.
 
465273991_1073824601157589_5965410925997214075_n.webp
 
Well, we should know Iowa’s results by 2200 tomorrow. Should be interesting. I still think Trump wins Iowa by 2% or more.
 
15th post
HikerGuy83 I hope you remember our wager.
You only have a few more days on this forum.
Make it count dude.
You will be missed I'm sure.

Hey Mike.....I won't hold you to the wager if he wins.
 
Back
Top Bottom