The truth is the first victim of fascism. The alt-right demonstrates this clearly by thinking that only the sources that confirm their beliefs are accurate. If one actually pays attention to every source the real story eventually comes out. The problem is that erroneous headlines scream from the front page while retractions whisper from the back page, compound that with the fact that retractions hardly ever occur in the RW media.
You mean like Obama's phony baloney jobs numbers and shit?
yeah and where his birth certificate? did trump ever hear from those investigators he sent to Hawaii or did hillary have them taken out with her secret ninja army?
If you want to talk of that start a thread on it.....or resume your bashing of Christians. It seems you're obsessed with that topic
No one bashes Christians. But we will call out those who preach hate, misogyny, and anti-semitism while claiming to follow the Jesus. How you can justify racism, bigotry and intolerance and claim to love Jesus who said "Love one another, as I have loved you". Notice there are no qualifications or restrictions on who is to be loved, or in "Do unto others as you would have them do to you".
Anything less isn't Christianity
Dear
Dragonlady and
PurpleOwl
Do you also credit Christians for healing the root causes of disease, abuse,
addiction, and even mental and criminal illness?
See resources I recommend for further medical research on Spiritual Healing:
http://www.spiritual-healing.us
Also, when seeking to correct and rebuke Christians,
I find it more effective to uphold and enforce standards
as equal peers, correcting each other mutually: to RESTORE
good faith relations not to condemn and reject the other person!
It's harder to correct others if you don't practice what
you preach either.
For those of us who live by natural secular laws,
I use the Bill of Rights, Code of Ethics and other secular language:
ethics-commission.net
For example, the secular equivalent of not judging and condemning others is
respecting DUE PROCESS of law, and not assuming someone is guilty
until proven innocent which is backwards.
PurpleOwl if you come in guns ablazing already assuming the person
you address is the enemy, you are violating natural laws that people
are innocent until proven guilty. So you will meet with the same reaction,
and wonder why people "judge you back" as you just did to an entire group
condemned by "guilt by association."