Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2815901/posts
Note the date and name. Three days before Pearl Harbor the contingency plans for the military in Europe and how the war would be fought were published by the OP's often used source. Hitler used the article in his Declaration of War against the United States.
Note that after whining and carping in three or four posts, this dolt and Roosevelt-apologist, has not been able to offer a single example of anything........anything.....in the thread that is not 100%, totally, absolutely correct and accurate.
The only conclusion is that every one of my facts is so stipulated:
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
The allies gave Germany terms at the end of WWI, and 20 years later Germany was ready to go again. WWII it was unconditional surrender and Germany is still at peace after 70 years.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2815901/posts
Note the date and name. Three days before Pearl Harbor the contingency plans for the military in Europe and how the war would be fought were published by the OP's often used source. Hitler used the article in his Declaration of War against the United States.
Note that after whining and carping in three or four posts, this dolt and Roosevelt-apologist, has not been able to offer a single example of anything........anything.....in the thread that is not 100%, totally, absolutely correct and accurate.
The only conclusion is that every one of my facts is so stipulated:
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
I responded to this claim by bringing up the North African, Italian and Southern France campaigns. You know so little about WWII or are in such support of Hitler that you would have freed up millions of German troops and given needed time for them to regroup and rebuild.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2815901/posts
Note the date and name. Three days before Pearl Harbor the contingency plans for the military in Europe and how the war would be fought were published by the OP's often used source. Hitler used the article in his Declaration of War against the United States.
Note that after whining and carping in three or four posts, this dolt and Roosevelt-apologist, has not been able to offer a single example of anything........anything.....in the thread that is not 100%, totally, absolutely correct and accurate.
The only conclusion is that every one of my facts is so stipulated:
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
I responded to this claim by bringing up the North African, Italian and Southern France campaigns. You know so little about WWII or are in such support of Hitler that you would have freed up millions of German troops and given needed time for them to regroup and rebuild.
You can run, but you can't hide.
These are the facts that I presented.
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
!
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2815901/posts
Note the date and name. Three days before Pearl Harbor the contingency plans for the military in Europe and how the war would be fought were published by the OP's often used source. Hitler used the article in his Declaration of War against the United States.
Note that after whining and carping in three or four posts, this dolt and Roosevelt-apologist, has not been able to offer a single example of anything........anything.....in the thread that is not 100%, totally, absolutely correct and accurate.
The only conclusion is that every one of my facts is so stipulated:
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
I responded to this claim by bringing up the North African, Italian and Southern France campaigns. You know so little about WWII or are in such support of Hitler that you would have freed up millions of German troops and given needed time for them to regroup and rebuild.
You can run, but you can't hide.
These are the facts that I presented.
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
!
You are not responding with an answer to the questions and challenges you were given. You are simply cutting and pasting a menagerie of non-related topics to the specific challenge.
You are suggesting, rather insisting, it was possible to have a conditional surrender in 1942 or '43 without giving an explanation for the factors I presented that made that scenario impossible.
Instead of deflecting away from the question you are being asked with an array of diverting statements and questions, how about if you answer the questions you were given and skipped over and ignored.
If you answer any of the inquiries you have been asked and evaded answering, we can move on to a new one. Perhaps we can ask you who the allies would have made a conditional surrender with. No one you have mentioned had anything resembling the authority to make such a surrender.
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
As I said-
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead
Your posts have only a slight relationship with 'facts'
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
As I said-
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead
Your posts have only a slight relationship with 'facts'
You meant as you lied.
No problem.
I dare you to find any posts that have 'only a slight relationship with 'facts.' Better not...you don't have the education for such an attempt.
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
As I said-
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead
Your posts have only a slight relationship with 'facts'
You meant as you lied.
No problem.
I dare you to find any posts that have 'only a slight relationship with 'facts.' Better not...you don't have the education for such an attempt.
Oh I am not even going to bother wasting my time again pointing out that the BS you rely upon is pure BS.
You just ignore any fact which you don't agree with.
I have ridden in that rodeo before- no need to do so again.
So I will confine my posts to mocking why you prefer Hitler to Roosevelt.
Just that PC even uses the term 'Real History' in a thread is hilarious.
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
As I said-
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead
Your posts have only a slight relationship with 'facts'
You meant as you lied.
No problem.
I dare you to find any posts that have 'only a slight relationship with 'facts.' Better not...you don't have the education for such an attempt.
Oh I am not even going to bother wasting my time again pointing out that the BS you rely upon is pure BS.
You just ignore any fact which you don't agree with.
I have ridden in that rodeo before- no need to do so again.
So I will confine my posts to mocking why you prefer Hitler to Roosevelt.
"Oh I am not even going to bother wasting my time again..."
Stop lying.
.
So.....lying is what you equate with responding to facts??
You must be a Liberal, huh?
As I said-
PC is still upset that the United States dared to fight Hitler- and didn't spend the lives of millions of American soldiers to defeat Stalin instead
Your posts have only a slight relationship with 'facts'
You meant as you lied.
No problem.
I dare you to find any posts that have 'only a slight relationship with 'facts.' Better not...you don't have the education for such an attempt.
Oh I am not even going to bother wasting my time again pointing out that the BS you rely upon is pure BS.
You just ignore any fact which you don't agree with.
I have ridden in that rodeo before- no need to do so again.
So I will confine my posts to mocking why you prefer Hitler to Roosevelt.
"Oh I am not even going to bother wasting my time again..."
Stop lying.
.
LOL- if you were really to stop lying, you would never be able to post again.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2815901/posts
Note the date and name. Three days before Pearl Harbor the contingency plans for the military in Europe and how the war would be fought were published by the OP's often used source. Hitler used the article in his Declaration of War against the United States.
Note that after whining and carping in three or four posts, this dolt and Roosevelt-apologist, has not been able to offer a single example of anything........anything.....in the thread that is not 100%, totally, absolutely correct and accurate.
The only conclusion is that every one of my facts is so stipulated:
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
I responded to this claim by bringing up the North African, Italian and Southern France campaigns. You know so little about WWII or are in such support of Hitler that you would have freed up millions of German troops and given needed time for them to regroup and rebuild.
You can run, but you can't hide.
These are the facts that I presented.
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.
!
You are not responding with an answer to the questions and challenges you were given. You are simply cutting and pasting a menagerie of non-related topics to the specific challenge.
You are suggesting, rather insisting, it was possible to have a conditional surrender in 1942 or '43 without giving an explanation for the factors I presented that made that scenario impossible.
Instead of deflecting away from the question you are being asked with an array of diverting statements and questions, how about if you answer the questions you were given and skipped over and ignored.
If you answer any of the inquiries you have been asked and evaded answering, we can move on to a new one. Perhaps we can ask you who the allies would have made a conditional surrender with. No one you have mentioned had anything resembling the authority to make such a surrender.
2. If Roosevelt brought the war to a conclusion two years before it did, 135, 000 or more American soldier's lives would have been saved.