Reagan appointed judge slams Trump.

[Frankenstein]

Read the story. It might be asking a lot. I'll help with the big words.

You know what you did you were trying to be cute

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nope.
Due process several times over. FACT!
Weak meme.
What is a lile?
Anyways you are a liar.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 Gang member with a History of Violence | Homeland Security

The mainstream media has peddled a sob story about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The facts are he is an illegal alien from El Salvador, a MS-13 gang member, and has a history of violence.

www.dhs.gov

Gas lighting again.

 

[Frankenstein]

Gas lighting again.

Coward reply

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You do not respect the law. You need to be deported to your ethnic origin.

I do respect the law.

Deport all the illegal aliens now!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I do respect the law.

Deport all the illegal aliens now!

Deport all MAGA who do not respect the law to their ethnic origin.

 

[pknopp]

You know what you did you were trying to be cute

I posted a news story you decided to not read before commenting.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Deport all MAGA who do not respect the law to their ethnic origin.

Deport all the leftists like that first.

 

[Crepitus]

You are worried about some gang banger who was given due process and rightfully deported. But when I bring up all the innocent children that were trafficked, exploited, and raped due to cackle's and cornpop's open borders policies you don't care.
Quite Sad.
Get a grip with your TDS

YOu need a better deflection. You already rendered that one useless by claiming the ridiculous numbers.

 

[Modern Messiah]

YOu need a better deflection. You already rendered that one useless by claiming the ridiculous numbers.

So your not worried about the children that were trafficked and were lost due to cackle's and tater head's open borders policies?
Your TDS is off the charts.
It makes you sound not only ignorant, but soulless.
Maybe if you approached things in a more logical, clear headed fashion you might actually gain some wisdom.
Your blind hate for President Trump is not a gateway to wisdom.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Gas lighting again.

Nope.
Did you read the link from The Department Of Homeland Security official website.
It sounds like you didn't and now you are gaslighting.
Also, you refused to answer my question.
What does "lile" mean?

 

[Modern Messiah]

Wrong.

Being illegally removed from the country is to be denied due process.

Nope. I provided a link to DHS official website. Read the link and stop lieing.
garcia received due process several times.
The American People voted for President Trump based on his border policies.
You are so devoted to your TDS that you are now fighting the will of The American People and you are in direct opposition to the truth.

 

[Frankenstein]

I posted a news story you decided to not read before commenting.

You were trying to deceive, and I called you on it

 

[pknopp]

You were trying to deceive, and I called you on it

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals said in its seven-page ruling Thursday that the Trump administration’s assertions in the case “should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.”

The unanimous ruling was written by Judge Harvie Wilkinson, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan.

Want me to read it to you?

 

[Modern Messiah]

Did someone ask them to? I've noted many times that I have no clue what they were doing and it was a part of the reason they lost.

Do you understand how all this works?

In 2019 President Trump's administration implemented the "Remain In Mexico" policy. It worked well, maintained order, and kept the country safe.
The cackles and tater head administration requested the supreme court to end the "Remain In Mexico" policy, which was working well, and the supreme court allowed it.
That would have been the perfect moment for the supremes to make a judicial stand and stand up for the rule of law, and stand up for The American People. But they did the opposite with no concern what so ever for the sovereignty and safety of The American People.
So in a way the supreme court not only did nothing for the safety of The American People or The American Border. They actually facilitated the invasion.
See how that works?

 

[pknopp]

In 2019 President Trump's administration implemented the "Remain In Mexico" policy. It worked well, maintained order, and kept the country safe.
The cackles and tater head administration requested the supreme court to end the "Remain In Mexico" policy, which was working well, and the supreme court allowed it.

Because it was just an EO. Following presidents can end EO's. I am against all EO's because it's the lazy way out. If Trump had put in the hard work and got a law passed, it couldn't have simply ended.

But it always come back to this. I am NOT defending anything Biden did. It's irrelevant to the case in question.

That would have been the perfect moment for the supremes to make a judicial stand and stand up for the rule of law, and stand up for The American People.

They did. I am amazed at how many (such as yourself) do not understand our laws and how they work. EO's clearly and legally can be over turned by the next administration.

But they did the opposite with no concern what so ever for the sovereignty and safety of The American People.
So in a way the supreme court not only did nothing for the safety of The American People or The American Border. They actually facilitated the invasion.
See how that works?

No. Take a Civics class.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Because it was just an EO. Following presidents can end EO's. I am against all EO's because it's the lazy way out. If Trump had put in the hard work and got a law passed, it couldn't have simply ended.

But it always come back to this. I am NOT defending anything Biden did. It's irrelevant to the case in question.




They did. I am amazed at how many (such as yourself) do not understand our laws and how they work. EO's clearly and legally can be over turned by the next administration.




No. Take a Civics class.

Everyday we are tested as human beings.
The supremes consciously decided to rule against the law, the safety of the border, and the safety of The American People.
They could have said no.
I'm not sure if you understand it so I am going to try my best to simplify it for you.
The USA has a border and the government (executive, judicial, and legislative branches) are charged with the task of protecting The American People in each one of their specific capacities. In this specific example we are talking about the border.
What positive outcome could have happened by just letting unvetted illegal aliens go free into our country.
In the supremes minds how would that have been a good thing.
It is illegal for people from other countries to just walk into The USA. FACT! E.O. or not.
Why would cackles and tater head repeal a policy that was working and keeping The American People safe.
Again, E.O. or not, if you are not a legal citizen of The USA you are not legally aloud to be here. FACT!

 

[pknopp]

Everyday we are tested as human beings.
The supremes consciously decided to rule against the law

They ruled for the law. Again, civics class.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nope.
Did you read the link from The Department Of Homeland Security official website.
It sounds like you didn't and now you are gaslighting.
Also, you refused to answer my question.
What does "lile" mean?

You look foolish and continue to gas light.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Everyday we are tested as human beings.
The supremes consciously decided to rule against the law, the safety of the border, and the safety of The American People.
They could have said no.
I'm not sure if you understand it so I am going to try my best to simplify it for you.
The USA has a border and the government (executive, judicial, and legislative branches) are charged with the task of protecting The American People in each one of their specific capacities. In this specific example we are talking about the border.
What positive outcome could have happened by just letting unvetted illegal aliens go free into our country.
In the supremes minds how would that have been a good thing.
It is illegal for people from other countries to just walk into The USA. FACT! E.O. or not.
Why would cackles and tater head repeal a policy that was working and keeping The American People safe.
Again, E.O. or not, if you are not a legal citizen of The USA you are not legally aloud to be here. FACT!

Oh, for heavens sake. You are so unaware and foolish. The Supremes ruled appropriately.

The Constitution says we all have due process except the families of foreign diplomats.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So your not worried about the children that were trafficked and were lost due to cackle's and tater head's open borders policies?
Your TDS is off the charts.
It makes you sound not only ignorant, but soulless.
Maybe if you approached things in a more logical, clear headed fashion you might actually gain some wisdom.
Your blind hate for President Trump is not a gateway to wisdom.