Oh, she didn't want to testify. Right. After the Senator started calling Bullshit on her, she definitely didn't want to testify.
Again, this is happening in your head. Your scenario makes no sense. She found out she was going to be subpoenaed, she came in voluntarily, knowing she would be attacked. Even you realize she had nothing to gain by telling what she told, that she didn't seek to come in and tell her story, but you insist on assigning her evil motives. At one point when I said this to you, you attacked her for privately complaining about Thomas' behavior, as if by complaining to friends, she manipulated a Senate committee into asking for her testimony. How did she do that? Witchcraft? I believe that's at the bottom of the bag you're pulling this out of at this point. Oh, the unknown woman made the powerful men listen to her. She must have used some evil power.
Now, you compare that to Lewisnky, who didn't have a fancy law degree, she made the congressmen look like monkeys...
The two situations have little in common.
Her story did not hold up to scrutiny. She never gave a good reason why she would transfer to another department if she thought this man was so horrible. Which is why polls taken after the testimony found most people didn't believe her AND the Senate actually confirmed Thomas.
Her story did hold up to scrutiny for many listeners. I believed her, and found her more credible than Thomas.
Whether or not something happened is not determined by polls.
Now, we've had 20 years since then of the fat feminists telling us 'we just don't get it' and other BS, but believe me, most people think this is a bullshit bit of law, including most women. It's another one of the reasons companies are packing up their shit and moving to third world countries. Good show.
Wow, now feminists are responsible for jobs moving overseas.
And by most women, you again mean some women you know. Not most women, meaning most of the women in the nation.
Oh, you clearly don't get it. What you're saying makes no sense, and you're apparently so eat up with anger that you don't even realize it. Look at what you're saying below-
Yup, I think I can. Waiting ten years after sucking up that whole time- no credibility.
Your thinking is just twisted.
She wants to get even, so she DOESN'T say anything? She wants to harm him, so she waits until she's told she's going to be subpoenaed to talk about it publicly?
She doesn't say anything to coworkers, you claim, so her story is false, but she did say something to friends, so that means she manipulated Senators into calling her to testify.
You've attacked her for working at EEOC, and then complained because she didn't work there long enough.
You praise Paula Jones, who sued for money, but attack Anita Hill, who didn't sue for money.
You say she should have been like Lewinsky, who tried to get out of testifying about a very different scenario, and ultimately testified, but attack Hill for knowing you can't dodge a subpoena?
Every time it's brought to your attention that your thinking doesn't hold up to scrutiny, you divert to Joe Biden, or say that 90% of supervisors do this so she should be tougher, or start attacking feminists as fat.
