Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office

Raskin lied about having cancer to explain his hair transplant complications.

There are 535 ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

The other 2.5 million are NOT ELECTED.

These people DO NOT WANT THEIR GRIFT ENDED.
 
WTF? Nowhere in that video did Raskin call for impeachment of Musk.

Stop posting stupid, fake bullshit.
They lie all the time about everything all the time. In that regard they take after their Dear Leader.
 
Horseshit, Trump is blatantly violating laws.

I don't believe a fucking word from the USAID funded NYT.
You ASSHOLES tried Soviet LAWFARE and LOST.
Now, you're using judicial tyranny.
Why the FUCK are you BIG MAD over uncovering MASSIVE FRAUD?????????
STFU
GTFOH
GFY
:dev3:
 
Just to repeat an FYI….

You don’t have to be elected to be able to be impeached.

WW
 
What the fuck?

Raskin had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and was treated for that at Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Nice plugs.

What the fuck?

Raskin had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and was treated for that at Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Who puts that garbage in your head?

Yea, he is a liar.

If Mar a Lago is worth $17 million and Trump raped in a department store, then I BELIEVE RASKIN LIED.
 
People need to go to civics classes again.

Congress holds the purse strings. Makes the laws.

Judiciary INTERPRETS THE LAWS.

Executive branch holds the bully pulpit of speech. Signs or vetoes laws, appoints judges, and appoints his cabinet to oversee executive level decisions.

That's it....
 
I don't believe a fucking word from the USAID funded NYT.

Trump Executive Order to end birthright citizenship - already ruled as brazen violation of Constitution.

Can you refute that fact?


Trump's immediate firing of 18 AG's brazenly violated law that required 30 days notice to Congress with specific reasoning.

Can you refute that fact?
 
Last edited:
Trump Executive Order to end birthright citizenship - already ruled as brazen violation of Constitution.

Are you going to refute that fact?
Yes....
Actually the intent of the constitution as explained by Madison has been ignored for decades. Just because it's been ignored does not make it a constitutional change by failing to follow the law.
 
Raskin lied about having cancer to explain his hair transplant complications.

There are 535 ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
536 Actually, you forgot the big guy in the White House. ;)
The other 2.5 million are NOT ELECTED.

These people DO NOT WANT THEIR GRIFT ENDED.
Exactly! All this bullshit about Elon Musk not being elected is idiotic, NONE of the federal auditors and inspectors general are elected.
 
Yes....
Actually the intent of the constitution as explained by Madison has been ignored for decades. Just because it's been ignored does not make it a constitutional change by failing to follow the law.
Yes what?

It's a FACT that it was ruled to be a violation of the law and was thrown out.

You can agree with that, you can disagree with that. Doesn't change that it's a fact.
 
Yes what?

It's a FACT that it was ruled to be a violation of the law and was thrown out.

You can agree with that, you can disagree with that. Doesn't change that it's a fact.
Activist judges can interpret wrongly but that doesn't mean that the constitution has changed or that the law of the land has changed.

CIP :
California decided it was not going to prosecute shoplifters who stole under $1,000 worth of merchandise. Or sold recreational drugs....

That didn't mean that theft was no longer illegal or that recreationaldrug use was illegal....but people acted as if it was.
 
In specific instances, not everything.

We need to correct inaccurate statements… like the one you tried to say here (suggesting it’s all encompassing when it’s not)

You ought to be either better informed or more honest… but either way get yourself together before you post
It is all encompassing to the extent that Acting President Musk could shoot someone on 5th Ave and get away with it
 
Activist judges can interpret wrongly but that doesn't mean that the constitution has changed or that the law of the land has changed.

According to that statement any violation of the law can be refuted as fact.

Whatever ruling you don't happen to like you'll simply say was an outcome of "activist judges".


Meanwhile, Trump's executive action was found to be brazen illegal and thrown out.
 
According to that statement any violation of the law can be refuted as fact.

Whatever ruling you don't happen to like you'll simply say was an outcome of "activist judges".


Meanwhile, Trump's executive action was found to be brazen illegal and thrown out.
Why are you BIG MAD over uncovering MASSIVE FRAUD?????
Fucking INSANE
 
Back
Top Bottom