Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Two wrongs don't make a right RetiredGySgtAccording to the left in this Country a tiny fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of firearms which are used in crime mean we should ban all such firearms and restrict all citizens from owning or possessing them. But when a Radical Islamist attacks then we are reminded over and over that only a small percent of Islam is radical and we should not blame them all.
Anyone notice a problem with their logic?
Two wrongs don't make a right RetiredGySgtAccording to the left in this Country a tiny fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of firearms which are used in crime mean we should ban all such firearms and restrict all citizens from owning or possessing them. But when a Radical Islamist attacks then we are reminded over and over that only a small percent of Islam is radical and we should not blame them all.
Anyone notice a problem with their logic?
It is just as wrong to criminalize someone because of your fear of unlawful abuse of guns
as it is to criminalize someone because of your fear of religious or terrorist abuse of Islam.
People have a right to their guns as we have a right to our religions.
But we cannot abuse either 1st or 2nd Amendment rights to violate the
other rights and laws within the same Bill of Rights and Constitution we are invoking.
The correct way to check against abuses of either 1st or 2nd Amendment
is to teach and enforce the Constitutional laws consistently in context.
So that way, neither can liberals take their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment,
out of context with the rest of the laws, and violate the religious freedom of others who believe differently.
Beliefs and equal protections must be respected equally or that's not equal justice and protection of the laws.
It would be discrimination to impose on people on the basis of creed, by abusing govt to do so.
OP- Your idea of what DEMS want is totally ridiculous. No one wants to ban all weapons. At the moment all we want is to fix the background check system so ALL sales are covered and those on the terror watch and no fly lists can't but weapons. A ban on future sales of military style high velocity assault weapons WOULD NOT BE CRAZY, but no one is talking about taking any guns away- not in the good old USA- but extremist idiots- BOTH SIDES.
I'm still waiting for the gun control idiots to explain why it makes sense to disarm citizens and leave them defenseless against murderers, rapists, and tweaked out drug addicts?
According to the left in this Country a tiny fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of firearms which are used in crime mean we should ban all such firearms and restrict all citizens from owning or possessing them. But when a Radical Islamist attacks then we are reminded over and over that only a small percent of Islam is radical and we should not blame them all.
Anyone notice a problem with their logic?
You make it seem like we've done NOTHING to fight radical Islam? We've changed and created all kids of laws andaw enforcement agencies . We've spent billions fighting terror.
What have we done to combat gun crime ?
You make it seem like we've done NOTHING to fight radical Islam? We've changed and created all kids of laws andaw enforcement agencies . We've spent billions fighting terror.
What have we done to combat gun crime ?
You know Timmy the first step in fighting radical islam in America should be to stop importing them.
OP- Your idea of what DEMS want is totally ridiculous. No one wants to ban all weapons. At the moment all we want is to fix the background check system so ALL sales are covered and those on the terror watch and no fly lists can't but weapons. A ban on future sales of military style high velocity assault weapons WOULD NOT BE CRAZY, but no one is talking about taking any guns away- not in the good old USA- but extremist idiots- BOTH SIDES.
You make it seem like we've done NOTHING to fight radical Islam? We've changed and created all kids of laws andaw enforcement agencies . We've spent billions fighting terror.
What have we done to combat gun crime ?
You know Timmy the first step in fighting radical islam in America should be to stop importing them.
The last two WERENT imported .
The last two WERENT imported .
You are of course aware that the ONLY difference between an AR-15 and a semi automatic hunting rifle is how they LOOK?Trying to disarm citizens is nuts. Banning future sales of assault weapons and fixing the background check system is all that would happen for years. No one with a brain suggests ending hunting. Deer are everywhere lol..
Terrorist realize that a dupe is in the WH. Their terrorism is now 2 fold.OP- Your idea of what DEMS want is totally ridiculous. No one wants to ban all weapons. At the moment all we want is to fix the background check system so ALL sales are covered and those on the terror watch and no fly lists can't but weapons. A ban on future sales of military style high velocity assault weapons WOULD NOT BE CRAZY, but no one is talking about taking any guns away- not in the good old USA- but extremist idiots- BOTH SIDES.
You are of course aware that the ONLY difference between an AR-15 and a semi automatic hunting rifle is how they LOOK?Trying to disarm citizens is nuts. Banning future sales of assault weapons and fixing the background check system is all that would happen for years. No one with a brain suggests ending hunting. Deer are everywhere lol..
