Racist Babies: Science Discovers Baby Racism Caused by Babies Inheriting Race of Parents

cnelsen

Gold Member
Oct 11, 2016
4,317
497
160
Washington, DC
Funny-Tongue-Showing-Black-Baby-Picture.jpg

The University of Toronto released a study showing infants show racial bias toward members of own race and against those of other races:

April 11, 2017

Two studies by researchers at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto and their collaborators from the US, UK, France and China, show that six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrate racial bias in favour of members of their own race and racial bias against those of other races.

In the first study, “Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music”, published in Developmental Science, results showed that after six months of age, infants begin to associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music.

In the second study, “Infants rely more on gaze cues from own-race than other-race adults for learning under uncertainty”, published in Child Development, researchers found that six- to eight-month-old infants were more inclined to learn information from an adult of his or her own race than from an adult of a different race.

(In both studies, infants less than six months of age were not found to show such biases).

This explains why the white anti-racist, BLM-supporting SJWs you see freaking out on TV against micro-aggressions and demanding safe spaces for minorities seem to be acting like such babies.

Racial bias begins at younger age, without experience with other-race individuals

“The findings of these studies are significant for many reasons,” said Dr. Kang Lee, professor at OISE’s Jackman Institute of Child Study, a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair and lead author of the studies. “The results show that race-based bias already exists around the second half of a child’s first year. This challenges the popular view that race-based bias first emerges only during the preschool years.”

Researchers say these findings are also important because they offer a new perspective on the cause of race-based bias.
Nature?

“When we consider why someone has a racial bias, we often think of negative experiences he or she may have had with other-race individuals. But, these findings suggest that a race-based bias emerges without experience with other-race individuals,” said Dr. Naiqi (Gabriel) Xiao, first author of the two papers and postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University.

This can be inferred because prior studies from other labs have indicated that many infants typically experience over 90 per cent own-race faces. Following this pattern, the current studies involved babies who had little to no prior experience with other-race individuals.

“These findings thus point to the possibility that aspects of racial bias later in life may arise from our lack of exposure to other-race individuals in infancy,” Dr. Lee said.
So, before, racism was caused by experiences with persons of other races, but now we see that it's caused by lack of experiences. Sounds to me like these people are flailing. Maybe they are asking the wrong question. Perhaps racism is as natural as self-interest and is not, therefore, in need of eliminating. Only understanding.

Study results could be significant in prevention of racial bias
But racial bias is a sin, so we're just going to keep trying to pound this square peg into this round hole.

He continued to explain that overall, the results of these studies are critically important given the issues of wide-spread racial bias and racism around the world.

“If we can pinpoint the starting point of racial bias, which we may have done here, we can start to find ways to prevent racial biases from happening,” he said.
What do you suppose they'll come up with? Mandatory integration of maternity wards. Random baby swaps to ensure parental diversity? Forced miscegenation?

“An important finding is that infants will learn from people they are most exposed to,”
Boy, eye-opening indeed.

added Dr. Xiao, indicating that parents can help prevent racial bias by, for example, introducing their children to people from a variety of races.
Never mind that experience shows exactly the opposite: that where you have the most racial hatred is where you have the most diversity.

As conveyed in the second study’s title, the bias was only observed in an uncertain context in which adults provided partially reliable information. As explained by Dr. Paul Quinn, an additional co-author, and Francis Alison Professor at the University of Delaware, “It’s as if the infants trust the own-race adult more than the other-race adult when both adults are unreliable.”

Racial bias can ‘permeate almost all of our social interactions’

Dr. Lee said it’s important to be mindful of the impact that racial bias has on our everyday lives, stressing that not only is explicit bias a concern, but so too are implicit forms.

“Implicit racial biases tend to be subconscious, pernicious, and insidious. It permeates almost all of our social interactions, from health care to commerce, employment, politics, and dating. Because of that, it’s very important to study where these kinds of biases come from and use that information to try and prevent racial biases from developing,” he said.

 
The saddest thing is that the OP is all excited about this without understanding it. Says a lot.
 
I guess the Klan has been recruiting all over again including in DC.

How odd -- in DC.

Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas -- sure no big surprise there.

But also DC ???

(In chess notation three question marks denotes a blunder.)
 
Big deal. A baby is more comfortable around people who look like his parents and other people he knows and trusts than around someone who doesn't. The results of another study showed that water as wet.
 
Funny-Tongue-Showing-Black-Baby-Picture.jpg

The University of Toronto released a study showing infants show racial bias toward members of own race and against those of other races:

April 11, 2017

Two studies by researchers at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto and their collaborators from the US, UK, France and China, show that six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrate racial bias in favour of members of their own race and racial bias against those of other races.

In the first study, “Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music”, published in Developmental Science, results showed that after six months of age, infants begin to associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music.

In the second study, “Infants rely more on gaze cues from own-race than other-race adults for learning under uncertainty”, published in Child Development, researchers found that six- to eight-month-old infants were more inclined to learn information from an adult of his or her own race than from an adult of a different race.

(In both studies, infants less than six months of age were not found to show such biases).

This explains why the white anti-racist, BLM-supporting SJWs you see freaking out on TV against micro-aggressions and demanding safe spaces for minorities seem to be acting like such babies.

Racial bias begins at younger age, without experience with other-race individuals

“The findings of these studies are significant for many reasons,” said Dr. Kang Lee, professor at OISE’s Jackman Institute of Child Study, a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair and lead author of the studies. “The results show that race-based bias already exists around the second half of a child’s first year. This challenges the popular view that race-based bias first emerges only during the preschool years.”

Researchers say these findings are also important because they offer a new perspective on the cause of race-based bias.
Nature?

“When we consider why someone has a racial bias, we often think of negative experiences he or she may have had with other-race individuals. But, these findings suggest that a race-based bias emerges without experience with other-race individuals,” said Dr. Naiqi (Gabriel) Xiao, first author of the two papers and postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University.

This can be inferred because prior studies from other labs have indicated that many infants typically experience over 90 per cent own-race faces. Following this pattern, the current studies involved babies who had little to no prior experience with other-race individuals.

“These findings thus point to the possibility that aspects of racial bias later in life may arise from our lack of exposure to other-race individuals in infancy,” Dr. Lee said.
So, before, racism was caused by experiences with persons of other races, but now we see that it's caused by lack of experiences. Sounds to me like these people are flailing. Maybe they are asking the wrong question. Perhaps racism is as natural as self-interest and is not, therefore, in need of eliminating. Only understanding.

Study results could be significant in prevention of racial bias
But racial bias is a sin, so we're just going to keep trying to pound this square peg into this round hole.

He continued to explain that overall, the results of these studies are critically important given the issues of wide-spread racial bias and racism around the world.

“If we can pinpoint the starting point of racial bias, which we may have done here, we can start to find ways to prevent racial biases from happening,” he said.
What do you suppose they'll come up with? Mandatory integration of maternity wards. Random baby swaps to ensure parental diversity? Forced miscegenation?

“An important finding is that infants will learn from people they are most exposed to,”
Boy, eye-opening indeed.

added Dr. Xiao, indicating that parents can help prevent racial bias by, for example, introducing their children to people from a variety of races.
Never mind that experience shows exactly the opposite: that where you have the most racial hatred is where you have the most diversity.

As conveyed in the second study’s title, the bias was only observed in an uncertain context in which adults provided partially reliable information. As explained by Dr. Paul Quinn, an additional co-author, and Francis Alison Professor at the University of Delaware, “It’s as if the infants trust the own-race adult more than the other-race adult when both adults are unreliable.”

Racial bias can ‘permeate almost all of our social interactions’

Dr. Lee said it’s important to be mindful of the impact that racial bias has on our everyday lives, stressing that not only is explicit bias a concern, but so too are implicit forms.

“Implicit racial biases tend to be subconscious, pernicious, and insidious. It permeates almost all of our social interactions, from health care to commerce, employment, politics, and dating. Because of that, it’s very important to study where these kinds of biases come from and use that information to try and prevent racial biases from developing,” he said.



This is, like, a Canadian study.

Has Toro checked this yet?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Big deal. A baby is more comfortable around people who look like his parents and other people he knows and trusts than around someone who doesn't. The results of another study showed that water as wet.
Be careful. Next, we'll have the libtards demanding funding to figure out how to end water's wetness.
 
Young children at play will interact and have fun with no concern for bullshit like race. 5-6 year olds on a playground don't waste a second on the idiocy that cowardly racists here obsess over 24/7, they just run in and have fun.
 
Most parents know, or learned from Dr. Spock, that 7-10 months is prime time for separation anxiety in babies. They want to be with people they know. They like familiar things. A parent's drastic haircut can throw a baby that age into a tizzy.

It doesn't seem accurate to call this "racism," rather a love of all things familiar, and a distrust of anything different.

Unfortunately, some don't grow out of that.
 
Most parents know, or learned from Dr. Spock, that 7-10 months is prime time for separation anxiety in babies. They want to be with people they know. They like familiar things. A parent's drastic haircut can throw a baby that age into a tizzy.

It doesn't seem accurate to call this "racism," rather a love of all things familiar, and a distrust of anything different.

Unfortunately, some don't grow out of that.
It is, technically, racism, but such a term seems inappropriate, as you note. I submit that it is with our use and understanding of the word "racism" the problem lies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top