Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dummy?
And she's not dishonest either...
I don't know how someone who is a Rhodes Scholar (she is) could be considered either stupid or dishonest.
Big Bill Clinton was also a Rhodes Scholar and wingnuts always called him all kinds of names like that.
Obama was personally attacked by Sarah Palin of all people because he was a community organizer and they minimize every achievement during his Harvard years.
I swear they are vapid.
When ole Maddcow refuses to accept her GE paycheck, maybe then i'll give her a little credibility...But just a little.
When ole Maddcow refuses to accept her GE paycheck, maybe then i'll give her a little credibility...But just a little.
That's asking a bit much, DON'T YOU THINK???
It is clear that republicans are threatened by her, becauase she is so smart and incisive, able to cut through republican bullshit like a butter knife cutting through a butter-shaped piece of a bulls' shit.
All that ranting & raving about those 'Evil Corporations' coming from a trained GE-owned Monkey, really is pathetic.
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, in a segment about GOP SuperPACs, blamed a technical glitch with a guest's audio on "some sort of nefarious conspiracy."
"I'm assuming it's an eccentric billionaire with an axe to grind" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
Audio Glitch Is 'Nefarious Conspiracy' By 'Eccentric Billionaire With Axe to Grind - YouTube
As MSNBC's South Carolina primary coverage came back from a commercial break, Maddow raised the issue of SuperPACs in that state.
"The Pro-Gingrich Super PAC 'Winning Our Future' has been a major player," she said. "Joining us now on the birthday of Citizens' United is NBC's Michael Isikoff with more from Washington."
Unfortunately, Isikoff's microphone was off, and viewers could barely hear what he was saying. After several seconds, Maddow said, "Obviously, that's some sort of nefarious conspiracy undermining Michael Isikoff's audio there. I'm assuming it's an eccentric billionaire with an axe to grind."
Read more: Maddow Blames Audio Glitch in GOP SuperPACS Segment on 'Nefarious Conspiracy' By 'Eccentric Billionaire' | NewsBusters.org
The GOP has a hard on for GE. Don't they recall that it was GE who employed a B actor named Ronald Reagan?Interestingly enough, when it came out that GE paid no taxes and got a huge refund, Ms. Maddow and Lawrence O'donnel BOTH came out against GE on their shows about how unfair it was.
And that was with them knowing that GE was the parent company of MSNBC, because they both stated it in their full disclosure statements.
Interestingly enough, when it came out that GE paid no taxes and got a huge refund, Ms. Maddow and Lawrence O'donnel BOTH came out against GE on their shows about how unfair it was.
And that was with them knowing that GE was the parent company of MSNBC, because they both stated it in their full disclosure statements.
When ole Maddcow refuses to accept her GE paycheck, maybe then i'll give her a little credibility...But just a little.
That's asking a bit much, DON'T YOU THINK???
It is clear that republicans are threatened by her, becauase she is so smart and incisive, able to cut through republican bullshit like a butter knife cutting through a butter-shaped piece of a bulls' shit.
All that ranting & raving about those 'Evil Corporations' coming from a trained GE-owned Monkey, really is pathetic.
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, in a segment about GOP SuperPACs, blamed a technical glitch with a guest's audio on "some sort of nefarious conspiracy."
"I'm assuming it's an eccentric billionaire with an axe to grind" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
Audio Glitch Is 'Nefarious Conspiracy' By 'Eccentric Billionaire With Axe to Grind - YouTube
As MSNBC's South Carolina primary coverage came back from a commercial break, Maddow raised the issue of SuperPACs in that state.
"The Pro-Gingrich Super PAC 'Winning Our Future' has been a major player," she said. "Joining us now on the birthday of Citizens' United is NBC's Michael Isikoff with more from Washington."
Unfortunately, Isikoff's microphone was off, and viewers could barely hear what he was saying. After several seconds, Maddow said, "Obviously, that's some sort of nefarious conspiracy undermining Michael Isikoff's audio there. I'm assuming it's an eccentric billionaire with an axe to grind."
Read more: Maddow Blames Audio Glitch in GOP SuperPACS Segment on 'Nefarious Conspiracy' By 'Eccentric Billionaire' | NewsBusters.org
Dummy?
Rachel Maddow
A graduate of Castro Valley High School in Castro Valley, California, Maddow earned a degree in public policy from Stanford University in 1994. At graduation she was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship. She was also the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship and began her postgraduate study in 1995 at Lincoln College, Oxford. In 2001, she earned a Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) in politics from Oxford University.
Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And she's not dishonest either...
Seriously. Hmm. Didn't realize she was that smart. I'll have to check her show out some time.
Interestingly enough, when it came out that GE paid no taxes and got a huge refund, Ms. Maddow and Lawrence O'donnel BOTH came out against GE on their shows about how unfair it was.
And that was with them knowing that GE was the parent company of MSNBC, because they both stated it in their full disclosure statements.
Link?
When ole Maddcow refuses to accept her GE paycheck, maybe then i'll give her a little credibility...But just a little.
That's asking a bit much, DON'T YOU THINK???
It is clear that republicans are threatened by her, becauase she is so smart and incisive, able to cut through republican bullshit like a butter knife cutting through a butter-shaped piece of a bulls' shit.
No, it's not a bit much. And to your second rant, well...
Maddcow and the rest of the Wingnuts over there sure do like their GE paychecks though huh? They work for the most evil Corporation on this Earth. They are all dishonest douchebags.
So, you expect so much principle out of people, that they should forego the reason they are at work, TO GET PAID?!! Granted, I am sure she enjoys her work, and she is well adept at it, but it's not community service, and for you to brand her a hypocrite for allowing herself to get paid is well, quite hilarious because it is hypocritical of YOU to say. Would YOU work for no money??? I doubt that you would.
So, you expect so much principle out of people, that they should forego the reason they are at work, TO GET PAID?!! Granted, I am sure she enjoys her work, and she is well adept at it, but it's not community service, and for you to brand her a hypocrite for allowing herself to get paid is well, quite hilarious because it is hypocritical of YOU to say. Would YOU work for no money??? I doubt that you would.
notice that the insane twit isn't demanding rushbot or sarah work for free.
it's really amusing watching him flail.
So, you expect so much principle out of people, that they should forego the reason they are at work, TO GET PAID?!! Granted, I am sure she enjoys her work, and she is well adept at it, but it's not community service, and for you to brand her a hypocrite for allowing herself to get paid is well, quite hilarious because it is hypocritical of YOU to say. Would YOU work for no money??? I doubt that you would.
notice that the insane twit isn't demanding rushbot or sarah work for free.
it's really amusing watching him flail.
Why would I demand that? I think its ridiculous to expect anyone to work for free because they doubt the moral integrity of the overlying corporate structure. If this was the case, we literally should all work for free.
notice that the insane twit isn't demanding rushbot or sarah work for free.
it's really amusing watching him flail.
Why would I demand that? I think its ridiculous to expect anyone to work for free because they doubt the moral integrity of the overlying corporate structure. If this was the case, we literally should all work for free.
not you... the paulian nutter
How many threads you made on her? Someones got a crush on her.
Why would I demand that? I think its ridiculous to expect anyone to work for free because they doubt the moral integrity of the overlying corporate structure. If this was the case, we literally should all work for free.
not you... the paulian nutter
Friendly fire... my bad!
