R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....

[Doc1]

What did you libtards think when Hillary was giving Russia our uranium?

Russia never got our uranium willow....not a single drop mined, leaves the USA....it's for USA use only, that was the purchase deal.

Who owns Uranium One?

 

[nat4900]

There's a difference between POTUS having a meeting with the Russians and a Presidential candidate colluding with a foreign government to overthrow the United States of America.

Secondly, like the LWLs kept asking about Hillary and RW corruption accusations, "Where are the charges?"

Well, Foulwind.......NO ONE is stating that Trump cannot have meetings with the Russians, HOWEVER,

Why should those meetings exclude US media but allow ONLY Russian media?
...and WHY discuss intelligence secrets with the ******* Russians with whom we have strict sanctions?

 

[WillowTree]

What did you libtards think when Hillary was giving Russia our uranium?

Russia never got our uranium willow....not a single drop mined, leaves the USA....it's for USA use only, that was the purchase deal.

How the Clintons Sold Out U.S. National Interests to the Putin Regime

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Neither did Trump.

He admitted it today, saying it is his ABSOLUTE RIGHT to do so!!!!

The pathological liar even called the meeting which was closed to American press but not to Russian press "an OPENLY SCHEDULED W.H. meeting."

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....
4:03 AM - 16 May 2017

Assuming merely for the sake of argument the scenario presented by the Post is true, then the "classified information" he shared with the Russians was no longer classified, as he as president made a decision within his authority to declassify it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

..........and our "beloved" orange-in-chief just provided the proof.

Disclosing classified intelligence to our arch-enemy, Russia, may seem perfectly legitimate to right wingers since the president can (according to them) do ANYTHING he wants....and as Nixon famously once stated, "if the president does something, it CANNOT, de facto, be called illegal.."

Trump's low self esteem and narcissistic tendencies need constant approval, and to show off to the Russians that he is privy to the most sensitive info., compelled this idiot to share intelligence that WILL (most likely) place individual spies at risk AND also cause for such intelligence to stop flowing to the WH since we have a moron with a big mouth in charge.

Whether Trump knows it or not, he IS colluding with Russian spies and if ever proof was needed, Trump voluntarily has provided such proof.

Every day the left figure out how to outdo themselves as crazy foaming at the mouth moonbats.

 

[Care4all]

Do you hear yourself?

Do you have an answer to the question?

No, other presidents did not share highly classified information with hostile foreign governments.

It seems to me that in the 90's we had a President sharing highly classified information with China and North Korea.

Whatever justifies your treason comrade.

I am not justifying it, it just has happened many times before, Obama has done it, Bush probably did and the Clinton's did it, why is everyone upset now?

I was critical of Clinton for doing it and I am not happy about Trump doing it. But I am looking at it from a historical perspective and we have done it often in our history. Why is this a big deal now?

Did previous presidents choose on their own to leak CLASSIFIED info or was it a well advised, coordinated strategy with our intelligence agencies, and dept of State and defense and homeland security's knowledge and approval?

 

[nat4900]

So previous Presidents never shared intelligence with other countries, Russia in particular?

Probably, BUT:

a. The intelligence was NOT ours to share with the Russians,
b. The intelligence places some spy or spies in danger of being killed
c. Russia is currently under severe sanctions for what the did in Crimea and the Ukraine and Georgia, etc........they are NOT our allies regardless of Trump's love affair with KGB Putin.

 

[nat4900]

must be. but todays news we know no details of is bad trump and all true.

right.

Trump OPENLY admitted that he shared intelligence secrets with the Russians and that since he is "president" he can do whatever he wants and screw those spies he has placed in danger.......

Had Trump NOT opened his mouth (through tweets) you could have a point about "fake media"....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

..........and our "beloved" orange-in-chief just provided the proof.

Disclosing classified intelligence to our arch-enemy, Russia, may seem perfectly legitimate to right wingers since the president can (according to them) do ANYTHING he wants....and as Nixon famously once stated, "if the president does something, it CANNOT, de facto, be called illegal.."

Trump's low self esteem and narcissistic tendencies need constant approval, and to show off to the Russians that he is privy to the most sensitive info., compelled this idiot to share intelligence that WILL (most likely) place individual spies at risk AND also cause for such intelligence to stop flowing to the WH since we have a moron with a big mouth in charge.

Whether Trump knows it or not, he IS colluding with Russian spies and if ever proof was needed, Trump voluntarily has provided such proof.

Every day the left figure out how to outdo themselves as crazy foaming at the mouth moonbats.

It's the standard Democrat MO. Make up something everyday to pound on - a shiny object for the base that will elicit fatigue from everyone else, gradually diminishing the target.

They deny Alinsky while religiously sticking to his methods.

 

[JonKoch]

WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets

then what would this be?

1991 START Treaty Language Requires Notification For "Movement Of Items Subject To The Limitations Provided For In The Treaty." The 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) REQUIRES both the United States and Russia to provide detailed information regarding the transfer of items.

New START Language Also Requires Revealing "Unique Identifiers" For Transferred SLBMs


Right-Wing Media Falsely Claim Obama "Betrayed" Britain By Complying With Treaty Language

 

[nat4900]

Odd, haven't heard of anyone claiming it was illegal.
You know more about it than the pundits on CNN, etc?
They all seem to acknowledge the President can declassify what he wants

Did I claim that Trump did something "illegal"????.......I did not.
What I am claiming is that the idiot "thinks" that he could share our nuclear capabilities and the names of our spies in Russia IF he chose to do so since you and other morons placed this jerk in the WH.

 

[JonKoch]

..........and our "beloved" orange-in-chief just provided the proof.

Disclosing classified intelligence to our arch-enemy, Russia, may seem perfectly legitimate to right wingers since the president can (according to them) do ANYTHING he wants....and as Nixon famously once stated, "if the president does something, it CANNOT, de facto, be called illegal.."

Trump's low self esteem and narcissistic tendencies need constant approval, and to show off to the Russians that he is privy to the most sensitive info., compelled this idiot to share intelligence that WILL (most likely) place individual spies at risk AND also cause for such intelligence to stop flowing to the WH since we have a moron with a big mouth in charge.

Whether Trump knows it or not, he IS colluding with Russian spies and if ever proof was needed, Trump voluntarily has provided such proof.

Every day the left figure out how to outdo themselves as crazy foaming at the mouth moonbats.

It's the standard Democrat MO. Make up something everyday to pound on - a shiny object for the base that will elicit fatigue from everyone else, gradually diminishing the target.

They deny Alinsky while religiously sticking to his methods.

And the right wing projects AGAIN!

 

[Divine Wind]

There's a difference between POTUS having a meeting with the Russians and a Presidential candidate colluding with a foreign government to overthrow the United States of America.

Secondly, like the LWLs kept asking about Hillary and RW corruption accusations, "Where are the charges?"

Well, Foulwind.......NO ONE is stating that Trump cannot have meetings with the Russians, HOWEVER,

Why should those meetings exclude US media but allow ONLY Russian media?
...and WHY discuss intelligence secrets with the ******* Russians with whom we have strict sanctions?

Namecall all you like, it just proves you are defensive. Now, "where are the charges"?

 

[easyt65]

..........and our "beloved" orange-in-chief just provided the proof.

Disclosing classified intelligence to our arch-enemy, Russia, may seem perfectly legitimate to right wingers since the president can (according to them) do ANYTHING he wants....and as Nixon famously once stated, "if the president does something, it CANNOT, de facto, be called illegal.."

Trump's low self esteem and narcissistic tendencies need constant approval, and to show off to the Russians that he is privy to the most sensitive info., compelled this idiot to share intelligence that WILL (most likely) place individual spies at risk AND also cause for such intelligence to stop flowing to the WH since we have a moron with a big mouth in charge.

Whether Trump knows it or not, he IS colluding with Russian spies and if ever proof was needed, Trump voluntarily has provided such proof.

TRANSLATION:
"R-W'ers on here wanted "proof" of Trump-Russia collusion....'

- I have no evidence....there is no evidence!"

Another new day...STILL no evidence.

------------------------------

It is funny how you are claiming evidence - that does not exist - can not be released because the evidence is classified...

....yet the Obama administration and his loyalists, according to the NSA and FBI, perpetrated Felony Espionage by releasing protected classified personal information on Trump and his Team in an attempt to undermine and overthrow the recently elected President.

The WH is leaking like a sieve right now...

...and you seriously expect people to believe that if there was evidence to support the snowflakes' fake claims the Democrats would keep it a secret?

 

[iceberg]

must be. but todays news we know no details of is bad trump and all true.

right.

Trump OPENLY admitted that he shared intelligence secrets with the Russians and that since he is "president" he can do whatever he wants and screw those spies he has placed in danger.......

Had Trump NOT opened his mouth (through tweets) you could have a point about "fake media"....

so we still don't know exactly what he said. given the left pees on themselves with every tweet, i'll wait before letting them tell me this is bad, m'kay?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

..........and our "beloved" orange-in-chief just provided the proof.

Disclosing classified intelligence to our arch-enemy, Russia, may seem perfectly legitimate to right wingers since the president can (according to them) do ANYTHING he wants....and as Nixon famously once stated, "if the president does something, it CANNOT, de facto, be called illegal.."

Trump's low self esteem and narcissistic tendencies need constant approval, and to show off to the Russians that he is privy to the most sensitive info., compelled this idiot to share intelligence that WILL (most likely) place individual spies at risk AND also cause for such intelligence to stop flowing to the WH since we have a moron with a big mouth in charge.

Whether Trump knows it or not, he IS colluding with Russian spies and if ever proof was needed, Trump voluntarily has provided such proof.

Every day the left figure out how to outdo themselves as crazy foaming at the mouth moonbats.

It's the standard Democrat MO. Make up something everyday to pound on - a shiny object for the base that will elicit fatigue from everyone else, gradually diminishing the target.

They deny Alinsky while religiously sticking to his methods.

And the right wing projects AGAIN!

Shrug.

I enjoy projecting facts. It's a hobby.

 

[Care4all]

What did you libtards think when Hillary was giving Russia our uranium?

Russia never got our uranium willow....not a single drop mined, leaves the USA....it's for USA use only, that was the purchase deal.

Who owns Uranium One?

Russians, but they never got use of the U.S. uranium...So it matters naught that they or anyone own the company....


We didn't give Russia OUR uranium for their use....as right wingers always claim....that's simply a made up, right wing, lie.

 

[Doc1]

What did you libtards think when Hillary was giving Russia our uranium?

Russia never got our uranium willow....not a single drop mined, leaves the USA....it's for USA use only, that was the purchase deal.

Who owns Uranium One?

Russians, but they never got use of the U.S. uranium...So it matters naught that they or anyone own the company....


We didn't give Russia OUR uranium....as right wingers always claim....that's simply a made up, right wing, lie.

Prove it, and don't use any of the Alt Left or MSM bullshit sites.

 

[nat4900]

What did you libtards think when Hillary was giving Russia our uranium?

You really should stop listening to Sean Hannity and trump's moronic tweets for all your bullshit news.

 

[nat4900]

The President has the authority to declassify information as he sees fit. Don't let the facts get in the way of your delirium though.

"Brilliant"......following THAT fucked up logic, the president has the authority to share with Russia our nuclear codes so that they can nullify our own launching.....In other words, a president can **** us over to any of our enemies and be "perfectly within his/her rights to do so".........Correct, moron?