Question: Should the Doctor be legally mandated to register a pregnancy or would it be the Pregnant woman?

[CowboyTed]

The Twitter files showed the censorship regarding COVID and various other things like the Hunter laptop story. The government pressured various social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook regarding certain topics with COVID. Many of the things censored turned out to be true, like doctors raising warnings about the vaccine causing myocarditis in young people.

So, sure, lying can result in harm, but so can withholding information.

I'm not accusing the government of mass murder, although I do find it interesting that you leapt to that conclusion.

States that lean Republican report more COVID vaccine-related adverse events, study finds

www.cidrap.umn.edu

I'll concede on the age thing, but nobody died because of me. I don't run media, nor do I have a major media presence. So you can shove your accusations up your ass.

Twitter as a company didn't want to spread information that they believed was harmful to their community...

Vaccine Misinformation kills people which killed people by having not getting the vaccine and dying or get harmed by COVID...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000199

MAGA was invested in conspiracies and were backing it, even if kills their own people...

Guess what, Twitter thought that was too fucked up for them...

As for Hunter Laptop contents was totally unverified and still is today... Maybe someone in Twitter thinks that targeting an individual who doesn't hold a job in Government was unfair and left them possibly liable for harassment..

 

[American Eagle]

They've always gone after the doctor, not the woman.

 

[surada]

I just want to logistically who should be in forming the Government of the pregnancy?

I am leaving out the father.

If the responsible party doesn't inform the Government then what is the penalty? I doubt a fine would do.

So lets presume it is the woman that has to do it... She doesn't and says nothing and is a serious risk of going cross State lines and having an abortion (maybe she is 16 and in high school). With violation of the law and very serious chance of another one been broken, should the woman be brought into custody until the woman gives birth...

Nothing disgusting, you would have these bunch of pregnant women overseen by guards to protect the baby..

There is also the issue of pregnant women doing dangerous activities e.g. Hiking, Smoking, Drinking, Running....

Republicans want a database of pregnant people. In many ways, abortion surveillance is already here

From period tracking apps to social media companies sharing info with police, pregnancy data is no longer safe

www.salon.com

I see a compromise here... Maybe we could get a trusted man to oversee the woman during pregnancy....

Hiking isn't dangerous for a pregnant woman.

Why do you want to register pregnancies?

 

[struth]

Hiking isn't dangerous for a pregnant woman.

Why do you want to register pregnancies?

Haha nobody is suggesting that, Salon is just propaganda

 

[dblack]

I just want to logistically who should be in forming the Government of the pregnancy?

I am leaving out the father.

If the responsible party doesn't inform the Government then what is the penalty? I doubt a fine would do.

So lets presume it is the woman that has to do it... She doesn't and says nothing and is a serious risk of going cross State lines and having an abortion (maybe she is 16 and in high school). With violation of the law and very serious chance of another one been broken, should the woman be brought into custody until the woman gives birth...

Nothing disgusting, you would have these bunch of pregnant women overseen by guards to protect the baby..

There is also the issue of pregnant women doing dangerous activities e.g. Hiking, Smoking, Drinking, Running....

Republicans want a database of pregnant people. In many ways, abortion surveillance is already here

From period tracking apps to social media companies sharing info with police, pregnancy data is no longer safe

www.salon.com

I see a compromise here... Maybe we could get a trusted man to oversee the woman during pregnancy....

**** Police!

 

[surada]

They've always gone after the doctor, not the woman.

This is Idiocy. Nobody registers pregnancies. Is this like Trump's antichristian persecution taskforce? You all just want more government.

 

[struth]

This is Idiocy. Nobody registers pregnancies. Is this like Trump's antichristian persecution taskforce? You all just want more government.

what in the world are you talking about? what a weird post. Trump isn't advocating people register their pregnacies....

 

[surada]

Haha nobody is suggesting that, Salon is just propaganda

Proposed by an Alabama Republican.

Last week, leading up to Mother’s Day, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) introduced the More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed (MOMS Act), a bill that would create a federal database for pregnant people nationwide.

Specifically, the database would be called “pregnancy.gov,” and provide resources related to pregnancy — including adoption agencies and pregnancy care providers — but it excludes abortion-related services. In fact, the proposed legislation forbids anyone who “performs, induces, refers for or counsels in favor of abortions” to be included.

 

[surada]

what in the world are you talking about? what a weird post. Trump isn't advocating people register their pregnacies....

It's been proposed by an Alabama republic.

Last week, leading up to Mother’s Day, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) introduced the More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed (MOMS Act), a bill that would create a federal database for pregnant people nationwide.

Specifically, the database would be called “pregnancy.gov,” and provide resources related to pregnancy — including adoption agencies and pregnancy care providers — but it excludes abortion-related services. In fact, the proposed legislation forbids anyone who “performs, induces, refers for or counsels in favor of abortions” to be included.

 

[struth]

Proposed by an Alabama Republican.

Last week, leading up to Mother’s Day, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) introduced the More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed (MOMS Act), a bill that would create a federal database for pregnant people nationwide.

Specifically, the database would be called “pregnancy.gov,” and provide resources related to pregnancy — including adoption agencies and pregnancy care providers — but it excludes abortion-related services. In fact, the proposed legislation forbids anyone who “performs, induces, refers for or counsels in favor of abortions” to be included.

hahha what does that have to do with Trump?

and the Mom Act doesn't require anyone to register...what in the world are you talking about? How weird.