Is your goal to stop humans from polluting our air and water?
If yes, why isn't that enough? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate in order to fight pollution?
If you were out there fighting pollution, 99% of humans would support your fight. But when you try to claim that pollution is changing the climate you lose 60% of the supporters.
Can someone explain?
If yes, why isn't that enough? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate in order to fight pollution?
If you were out there fighting pollution, 99% of humans would support your fight. But when you try to claim that pollution is changing the climate you lose 60% of the supporters.
Can someone explain?