Ibentoken
Don't Tread on Me
- Thread starter
- #61
Yes, sweetie.And some of you believed it's about equality and rights. It's about submission.
Commission Forces Christian Company to Print LGBT T-Shirts The Federalist Papers
(we have a mafia?)![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, sweetie.And some of you believed it's about equality and rights. It's about submission.
Commission Forces Christian Company to Print LGBT T-Shirts The Federalist Papers
(we have a mafia?)![]()
So you support telling the fags to **** off. We're just not doing it politely enough....instructed his sales representatives to decline to design, print, or produce orders whenever the requested material was perceived to promote an event or organization that conveys messages that are considered by the sales representative or Mr. Adamson to be inappropriate or inconsistent with Christian beliefs.”
all i needed to see...Why are you people so ******* stupid? All you have to say is " sorry we arent taking anymore business right now, sorry.
There i just gave you the loophole in order to get around this., instead you act like morons and do this crap...Which is illegal.
This story is bullshit. There is no "Kentucky Human Rights Commission", let alone one that has the authority and jurisdiction to drag a private entity in front of it and order it to do anything. There is no human rights administrative law in domestic American law.
Ah, I think you should look before you jump: Kentucky Kentucky Commission on Human Rights - Home
The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights
enforces the Kentucky Civil Rights Act
and the U.S. Civil Rights Act.
These laws make discrimination illegal.
The Commission works to end discrimination
and promote equality for everyone.
To file a discrimination complaint or for more information,
contact us at
I'm SO out of touch. Dunno who my local capo or don is to say nothing of Godfather.![]()
Good question, maybe pitcher and catcher? It's unbelievable what political clout such a few have. The libs have been successful in equating the word tolerance with agreement with them.About four years ago, before anyone had legal gay marriages, I received notice from my insurance company that due to new state regulations the terms "husband, wife, marriage and divorce" were no longer permitted in their contracts and would be replaced with domestic partners.
He who controls the language controls the culture.
Hmmm, so at their "weddings" what terms to do they use? "I now pronounce you man and man?" "You may now kiss the .........guy with a little less 5 a clock shadow?"
I just don't know why the nation must be forced to accept what the very few want.
Good question, maybe pitcher and catcher? It's unbelievable what political clout such a few have. The libs have been successful in equating the word tolerance with agreement with them.
I think the government looks the other way because to them it is income redistribution and fairness. I work with the public too and I've noticed liberals in general know many ways to defraud the government. They pass this stuff around and it is common knowledge to them. They see nothing wrong with it, it's free money so it's stupid to not reach out and take it.I am going to educate you poor dumb bastards on an aspect of homo life. I am not going to say exactly what I do for a living, but I will say that my job causes me to come in contact with the public and to be exposed to people's personal finances, by their consent of course. I do not turn down business from gay people because I am more concerned with earning a living. Periodically I get a gay couple come into my office, both all-male and all-female couples.
Without fail I almost always (like 99% of the time) find that in the couple, one of them works, usually at a good job, and the other one stays at home and receives a Social Security Disability check. I am not talking about wealthy people, or famous people. I am talking here about the average, run-of-the-mill, middle class, living paycheck to paycheck gay couple. Other than their sexual preference they are the same as everybody else. They are not advocates of flaming queers, just normal folks. They just lick different body parts than we would.
I like tits, they like dicks. Whatever.
I have seen this so often that I firmly believe that inside the homo community there is an "education effort", for lack of a better term, that encourages them to apply for disability benefits in order to (1) enable their lifestyle (I.e., a gay Ozzie and Harriet where the dad works and the mom stays at home, and (2) to mitigate/offset not having the same health insurance benefits that Herero couples have.
One day I am going to ask one of these people what the deal is with this. Until then, I am going to stick with my analysis until I hear one that makes more sense. Here are the issues raised by this situation:
- They are engaging in a systematic scheme to defraud Social Security. This is a felony. Of course, so are a lot of people.
- Homos seek hierarchy in their personal relations, which is weird. It is not like they are going to reproduce. Though, some may bring kids into the relationship.
- There is clearly an organized community of homos from which they draw info and resources.
- Taxpayers generally do not know or understand the dynamics at play in a homo relationship and would probably object if they knew their tax money was being used to enable the homo lifestyle. Personally, I do not care. I see it as an offset of healthcare premiums that would otherwise be extracted from American's spending power if same-sex benefits were being paid. Of course, same-sex benefits are just around the corner. So, if something is not done then they will be double-dipping at the public trough.
- There is MASSIVE entitlement benefits fraud in the areas of SS Disability, SSI, EIC and other tax credits for low-income people. The government knows this. However I have seen virtually no action on their part, save for intermittent nominal actions, to quell this fraud. The allowance of this fraud to continue is in itself a form of welfare. However, NOBODY voted to allow it. Rather, there is a policy of intentional non-enforcement. Yeah, from time to time you will see someone prosecuted for this crime. But it is rare. Moreover, it is probably done merely for political reasons when people like me who see this going on start making too much noise.
You people are financing people's lifestyles with welfare programs you do not even know about, and that neither you nor your representative ever voted on to approve. Further, most of you pro-gay folks have absolutely no idea how these people live and what they really think. You are merely going pro or con based upon a detached and abstract analysis.
It isn't discrimination and repeating like a broken record doesn't make it so and I'm not a Republican you stupid idiot. hopethishelps.Good question, maybe pitcher and catcher? It's unbelievable what political clout such a few have. The libs have been successful in equating the word tolerance with agreement with them.
From the cons latest campaign:
#iamarepublican because you intolerant liberals refuse to tolerate my right to discriminate against you
I think the government looks the other way because to them it is income redistribution and fairness. I work with the public too and I've noticed liberals in general know many ways to defraud the government. They pass this stuff around and it is common knowledge to them. They see nothing wrong with it, it's free money so it's stupid to not reach out and take it.I am going to educate you poor dumb bastards on an aspect of homo life. I am not going to say exactly what I do for a living, but I will say that my job causes me to come in contact with the public and to be exposed to people's personal finances, by their consent of course. I do not turn down business from gay people because I am more concerned with earning a living. Periodically I get a gay couple come into my office, both all-male and all-female couples.
Without fail I almost always (like 99% of the time) find that in the couple, one of them works, usually at a good job, and the other one stays at home and receives a Social Security Disability check. I am not talking about wealthy people, or famous people. I am talking here about the average, run-of-the-mill, middle class, living paycheck to paycheck gay couple. Other than their sexual preference they are the same as everybody else. They are not advocates of flaming queers, just normal folks. They just lick different body parts than we would.
I like tits, they like dicks. Whatever.
I have seen this so often that I firmly believe that inside the homo community there is an "education effort", for lack of a better term, that encourages them to apply for disability benefits in order to (1) enable their lifestyle (I.e., a gay Ozzie and Harriet where the dad works and the mom stays at home, and (2) to mitigate/offset not having the same health insurance benefits that Herero couples have.
One day I am going to ask one of these people what the deal is with this. Until then, I am going to stick with my analysis until I hear one that makes more sense. Here are the issues raised by this situation:
- They are engaging in a systematic scheme to defraud Social Security. This is a felony. Of course, so are a lot of people.
- Homos seek hierarchy in their personal relations, which is weird. It is not like they are going to reproduce. Though, some may bring kids into the relationship.
- There is clearly an organized community of homos from which they draw info and resources.
- Taxpayers generally do not know or understand the dynamics at play in a homo relationship and would probably object if they knew their tax money was being used to enable the homo lifestyle. Personally, I do not care. I see it as an offset of healthcare premiums that would otherwise be extracted from American's spending power if same-sex benefits were being paid. Of course, same-sex benefits are just around the corner. So, if something is not done then they will be double-dipping at the public trough.
- There is MASSIVE entitlement benefits fraud in the areas of SS Disability, SSI, EIC and other tax credits for low-income people. The government knows this. However I have seen virtually no action on their part, save for intermittent nominal actions, to quell this fraud. The allowance of this fraud to continue is in itself a form of welfare. However, NOBODY voted to allow it. Rather, there is a policy of intentional non-enforcement. Yeah, from time to time you will see someone prosecuted for this crime. But it is rare. Moreover, it is probably done merely for political reasons when people like me who see this going on start making too much noise.
You people are financing people's lifestyles with welfare programs you do not even know about, and that neither you nor your representative ever voted on to approve. Further, most of you pro-gay folks have absolutely no idea how these people live and what they really think. You are merely going pro or con based upon a detached and abstract analysis.
One example is with appliances. There's a statewide, maybe national?, program here to upgrade appliances with newer more energy efficient models if your old one qualifies. They buy old ones or take them off peoples hands and get the upgraded new one for "free".
It isn't discrimination and repeating like a broken record doesn't make it so and I'm not a Republican you stupid idiot. hopethishelps.
So you support telling the fags to **** off. We're just not doing it politely enough....instructed his sales representatives to decline to design, print, or produce orders whenever the requested material was perceived to promote an event or organization that conveys messages that are considered by the sales representative or Mr. Adamson to be inappropriate or inconsistent with Christian beliefs.”
all i needed to see...Why are you people so ******* stupid? All you have to say is " sorry we arent taking anymore business right now, sorry.
There i just gave you the loophole in order to get around this., instead you act like morons and do this crap...Which is illegal.
The real question is why I don't have you on ignore.....So you support telling the fags to **** off. We're just not doing it politely enough....instructed his sales representatives to decline to design, print, or produce orders whenever the requested material was perceived to promote an event or organization that conveys messages that are considered by the sales representative or Mr. Adamson to be inappropriate or inconsistent with Christian beliefs.”
all i needed to see...Why are you people so ******* stupid? All you have to say is " sorry we arent taking anymore business right now, sorry.
There i just gave you the loophole in order to get around this., instead you act like morons and do this crap...Which is illegal.
So how many boy friends did you take on in the big house, suzie?
The real question is why I don't have you on ignore.....So you support telling the fags to **** off. We're just not doing it politely enough....instructed his sales representatives to decline to design, print, or produce orders whenever the requested material was perceived to promote an event or organization that conveys messages that are considered by the sales representative or Mr. Adamson to be inappropriate or inconsistent with Christian beliefs.”
all i needed to see...Why are you people so ******* stupid? All you have to say is " sorry we arent taking anymore business right now, sorry.
There i just gave you the loophole in order to get around this., instead you act like morons and do this crap...Which is illegal.
So how many boy friends did you take on in the big house, suzie?
Your grade school level posts offer nothing to the conversation. A true waste of bandwidth.
Sometimes it pays to do a quickie Google before posting.This story is bullshit. There is no "Kentucky Human Rights Commission", let alone one that has the authority and jurisdiction to drag a private entity in front of it and order it to do anything. There is no human rights administrative law in domestic American law.
I'll take your response as PLEASE PUT ME ON IGNORE.The real question is why I don't have you on ignore.....So you support telling the fags to **** off. We're just not doing it politely enough....instructed his sales representatives to decline to design, print, or produce orders whenever the requested material was perceived to promote an event or organization that conveys messages that are considered by the sales representative or Mr. Adamson to be inappropriate or inconsistent with Christian beliefs.”
all i needed to see...Why are you people so ******* stupid? All you have to say is " sorry we arent taking anymore business right now, sorry.
There i just gave you the loophole in order to get around this., instead you act like morons and do this crap...Which is illegal.
So how many boy friends did you take on in the big house, suzie?
Your grade school level posts offer nothing to the conversation. A true waste of bandwidth.
I'll take your answer as too many to count