Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,205
- 67,147
- 3,565
Is Charo Spanish?Charo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Charo Spanish?Charo?
Sorry to chop, but thanks for that. Mess with Claudia and I will find you.He wasn’t serious , and we have a much biggerfish to fry!
Nobody messes with my crush.
If you dont know I bet Claudia Sheinbaum does know
Muscovite House Speaker Threatens to ‘Take Back’ Alaska
Those crazy Muscovites.
ALASKA IS NOT RUSSIA'S PROPERTY ANYMORE. IT WAS SOLD TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CENTURIES AGO, IS CURRENTLY A STATE AND NOT A TERRITORY. iT HAS EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW. iF PUTIN WANTS TO GOVERN IT HE NEEDS TO APPLY FOR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP, MOVE TO ALASKA, AND RUN FOR THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE PRESENT POPULATION THAT LIVES IN ALASKA. END OF STORY.
Too many toilets in Alaska for any muscovite to feel comfortable....
![]()
the![]()
horde, Please try so we can end this mess! so, Belarus , Mongolia , Finland, Japan , Ukraine, etc. can "restore historical justice"....
Alaska AND CALIFORNIA ....
![]()
![]()
![]()
Many Western commentators here don’t understand the nature of a Mongol empire. A Mongol empire can exist only as long as it expands. Do you remember what Khan Putin did first when he was handed the Mongol–Moscow throne by the dying, alcohol-soaked Khan Yeltsin? Looks like Trump knows the drill and is working on the complete decolonization of the Moscow–Mongol empire.Reposting 8,000 X dumbass tweets does not help your case.
1. Putin is not going to invade Alaska. His comment about reclaiming is about a tenth as serious as Trump offering to buy Greenland.
2. Putin is a little busy right now in Ukraine, so even if he wanted to, he can't.
3. Alaska is 5000 miles from Moscow and the supply lines to mount an invasion of Alaska would be beyond Russia's capacity.
4. If Putin did invade, we would in a matter of days, kill or drive out every Russian soldier who landed on US soil.
5. Even if Russia did somehow take back Alaska, that would not threaten the sovereignty of the USA. We would continue to be the world's sole global superpower.
Many Western commentators here don’t understand the nature of a Mongol empire. A Mongol empire can exist only as long as it expands. Do you remember what Khan Putin did first when he was handed the Mongol–Moscow throne by the dying, alcohol-soaked Khan Yeltsin? Looks like Trump knows the drill and is working on the complete decolonization of the Moscow–Mongol empire.
Moscow State University: "In other words, Muscovy did not experience the influence of the Mongols, Muscovy was the great “Mongol” Empire itself."
a very good point. Do you think that they have 50 years more ?The Mongol-Moscow (Russian) empire is already doomed. In 50 years there won't be a Mongol (Russian) race. Their terminal demographic collapse will see to that.
... modern technology and the international ethical environment led to the inevitable death of the Mongol-The 'global reaction' falls short of being very effective.
![]()
what countries are supporting putin - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
I’m fully behind D. Trump on this. IsSaddam Putsein the next one in line?
CONTEXT :
"give us back Alaska, our nativeMoscow land"
- "Lyube" , putin's favourite band
Are you kidding?Saddam Putsein the next one in line?
You mean claudia’s granddaughterNobody messes with my crush.
Simply put, he is mentally ill. He is always anger and frustrated and has lost the ability to effetely communicate.Let me first say that I am elated that Trump was successful in snapping up Maduro. The operation was impressive and I have to give him (and the military) kudos for the way they were able to accomplish that.
I will give Trump a "thumbs up" for having done this with this success.
Nonetheless and on the negative side of things, this kind of action opens the door for us (and any other country in the world) to do the same again and again. That is a precedent that might end up being a huge negative as everyone can always find a reason for doing something like this (just like Putin and his reason for invading Ukraine). Unfortunately, the reality is that few times does "the end justify the means".
Such action (though successful) can be a big negative overall.
A little while ago in his press conference, Trump stated that he will be running Venezuela until they can find someone else (a Venezuelan) to run it. Do we have that right (run another country)? This also opens the door for taking over Greenland, Panama, and whoever Trump gets a craving to have. Why can't this also be applied to Putin taking over Poland and China taking over Taiwan. They (Putin and XI) feel they have good and valid reasons to do it.
This action (though great right now) could open the door for world dictators to take over or worse, to cause World Was III to happen. That is the door that Trump opened.
Would such a consequence be worth what Trump did to Venezuela? Can you explain that?