Putin: I'm Ready to Speak to Trump About Peace

Of course. And republicans don't? LMAO. The ONLY reason Trump continues to run is because of power, and to stay out of jail. But continue to drink the koolaid and think republicans are looking out for you. Could you possibly be a bigger gullible fool?
^^ ^^ ^^
1734873296277.webp
 
In Russian, Ukrain means the equivalent of what Americans call "the sticks"
In "warmonger-neocrazy-CIA newspeak"- "Ukraine" means using that country as a battering ram against Moscow , thereafter Removing Putin from power and balkanizing Russia - that 's according to the brain dead gospel from Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Pierre Delecto, , John Rutherford and other fruit cakes.

WHO financially benefitted from forcing Russia to invade Ukraine? Raytheon

Who bought Raytheon stock the day Russia invaded Ukraine ? John Rutherford

Who exposed the scam ? Matt Gaetz

Who sits on the House ethics committee? John Rutherford

Who released the Matt Gaetz ' ethics report ? John Rutherford

 
The equipment they've donated is a drop in the bucket for what they're getting back in return. Putin's army and navy has been decimated without one american soldier being killed. The US has never known such a victory.
Well it took a while for you imbeciles to admit that the warmongers-neocrazy axis PROVOKED Russia into attacking Ukraine in order to "decimate Russian Armed Forces".

For some reason the brain dead motherfuckers had no qualms about using Ukrainians as peons in that geopolitical war.
 
Well it took a while for you imbeciles to admit that the warmongers-neocrazy axis PROVOKED Russia into attacking Ukraine in order to "decimate Russian Armed Forces".

For some reason the brain dead motherfuckers had no qualms about using Ukrainians as peons in that geopolitical war.
You are flat wrong. The universal wisdom was that the Russians would go through the Ukrainian Army like crap through a goose, NOT that Ukraine could still be putting up a good fight three years later. No one provoked Russia, Putin wanted Ukraine as part of his new Russian Empire.
 
You are flat wrong. The universal wisdom was that the Russians would go through the Ukrainian Army like crap through a goose, NOT that Ukraine could still be putting up a good fight three years later. No one provoked Russia, Putin wanted Ukraine as part of his new Russian Empire.
Shut the **** up you ignorant fool

Ukraine gained its independence in 1993 - if your nonsensical allegation is true, Putin waited 29 years before deciding that he wanted Ukraine

Have you read the Minsk 1 and 2 agreements ?

Are you aware that Obama turned Ukraine into a CIA Colony after he removed Viktor Yanukovych from power ?

Have you watched Oliver Stone's Documentary "Ukraine on Fire"

 
You are flat wrong. The universal wisdom was that the Russians would go through the Ukrainian Army like crap through a goose, NOT that Ukraine could still be putting up a good fight three years later. No one provoked Russia, Putin wanted Ukraine as part of his new Russian Empire.
I didn't get to read what you were responding to because I've learned to put morons on 'ignore'. It's the best way to enjoy the site.

I was under no illusions about the quality of the Russian Army. They have always fought 'Casualties wars' in which they were willing to lose more men in order to win. I knew they had poor leadership based more on loyalty than any measure of skill and I also knew their equipment was poorly designed and made.

But I didn't realize the extent to which Ukraine was willing to go to keep from being ruled by Russia -- Again. I knew they'd rather die than go back to being socialist scum.... Which is true of all civilized people, but I under-estimated their resolve.

I figured the Russians would make some sucking noises and Ukraine' leadership would use the opportunity to betray their people and put them back in chains.

I am happy I was wrong.

One thing we all need to understand, Putin is there because Bill The Rapist Clinton betrayed Russia. When The USSR fell, NOT Russia, the USSR, The Rapist had two choices; he could let The Russian People hit rock bottom in what was known as a "Hard Landing" or the USA and Euro-Scum could help The Russian People out. Which would have taken a lot of money and effort. We know why Euro-Scum didn't help..... They never have, and they never will, care about anything other than themselves.

Clinton, OTOH, saw the most incredible windfall of money in Human History. The Cold War had ended and, in the process, freed up BILLIONS.... No -- TRILLIONS of dollars that he could now squander. (70% of our budget went to Defense before the fall of the USSR)

He did. Squander it, I mean. All the BILLIONS and tens of BILLIONS we used to spend on Defense was no longer necessary and... Well, dimocrap scum gonna dimocrap scum.

As to why Putin invaded Ukraine? He certainly did want a Warm Water Port but there's always the fact, FACT, that socialist Countries (Russia abandoned Hard socialism for a 'softer' variety) can't support themselves. So they invade, conquer and loot other countries. Hitler, anyone?

None of them can. None of them ever have or ever will support themselves. socialists lack imgination and work ethic. It's why they're socialists in the first place. Plus, it's easier to maintain control of a Country internally when it's at War..... So, Putin invaded Ukraine and -- Here we are.
 
I didn't get to read what you were responding to because I've learned to put morons on 'ignore'. It's the best way to enjoy the site.

I was under no illusions about the quality of the Russian Army. They have always fought 'Casualties wars' in which they were willing to lose more men in order to win. I knew they had poor leadership based more on loyalty than any measure of skill and I also knew their equipment was poorly designed and made.

But I didn't realize the extent to which Ukraine was willing to go to keep from being ruled by Russia -- Again. I knew they'd rather die than go back to being socialist scum.... Which is true of all civilized people, but I under-estimated their resolve.

I figured the Russians would make some sucking noises and Ukraine' leadership would use the opportunity to betray their people and put them back in chains.

I am happy I was wrong.

One thing we all need to understand, Putin is there because Bill The Rapist Clinton betrayed Russia. When The USSR fell, NOT Russia, the USSR, The Rapist had two choices; he could let The Russian People hit rock bottom in what was known as a "Hard Landing" or the USA and Euro-Scum could help The Russian People out. Which would have taken a lot of money and effort. We know why Euro-Scum didn't help..... They never have, and they never will, care about anything other than themselves.

Clinton, OTOH, saw the most incredible windfall of money in Human History. The Cold War had ended and, in the process, freed up BILLIONS.... No -- TRILLIONS of dollars that he could now squander. (70% of our budget went to Defense before the fall of the USSR)

He did. Squander it, I mean. All the BILLIONS and tens of BILLIONS we used to spend on Defense was no longer necessary and... Well, dimocrap scum gonna dimocrap scum.

As to why Putin invaded Ukraine? He certainly did want a Warm Water Port but there's always the fact, FACT, that socialist Countries (Russia abandoned Hard socialism for a 'softer' variety) can't support themselves. So they invade, conquer and loot other countries. Hitler, anyone?

None of them can. None of them ever have or ever will support themselves. socialists lack imgination and work ethic. It's why they're socialists in the first place. Plus, it's easier to maintain control of a Country internally when it's at War..... So, Putin invaded Ukraine and -- Here we are.
PURE UNADULTERATED CIA BULLCRAP - SEE POST #85
 
Well it took a while for you imbeciles to admit that the warmongers-neocrazy axis PROVOKED Russia into attacking Ukraine in order to "decimate Russian Armed Forces".

For some reason the brain dead motherfuckers had no qualms about using Ukrainians as peons in that geopolitical war.

But Tucker directly asked Putin if NATO expansion was the reason why he entered Ukraine and Putin scolded him for being unserious, then followed up with a half rant about how Russia had a historical claim to Ukraine. If Putin is saying NATO isn't the reason why he invaded Ukraine why are you continuing the charade?
 
But Tucker directly asked Putin if NATO expansion was the reason why he entered Ukraine and Putin scolded him for being unserious, then followed up with a half rant about how Russia had a historical claim to Ukraine. If Putin is saying NATO isn't the reason why he invaded Ukraine why are you continuing the charade?
That is irrelevant .

The mothers of all warmongers-neocrazies - Lindsey Graham and John McCain - had been in Ukraine since 2012 stirring things up. The Republic of Crimea has been part of the USSR since the 1600's.

Since 2014 Putin had been demanding that Ukraine's status as a NEUTRAL BUFFER ZONE BE RESTORED - he was ignored . That was the principle upon which the Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved,

You are a stupid ****.

 
That is irrelevant .

The mothers of all warmongers-neocrazies - Lindsey Graham and John McCain - had been in Ukraine since 2012 stirring things up. The Republic of Crimea has been part of the USSR since the 1600's.

Since 2014 Putin had been demanding that Ukraine's status as a NEUTRAL BUFFER ZONE BE RESTORED - he was ignored . That was the principle upon which the Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved,

You are a stupid ****.




So the guy who started the war, says NATO isn't the reason, but you deem that as irrelevant? If he had replied that NATO expansion was the reason you'd be quoting his words left and right whenever you had the chance. You don't even realize that your brain has been hardwired to believe this narrative to the point you can't let go of it under any circumstances. If NATO didn't exist, Putin would be running amok all over the europe right now to reconstitute the USSR, which is his real end goal. That's how stupid you sound.
 
Back
Top Bottom