Putin, if you want to avoid WWIII you shall take Novorossis back a.s.u.p.

[Taz]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

 

[Bleipriester]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

They just showed how the movement of troops works. The West can´t even do that. Unlearned. And China won´t be your ally, you are treating it badly.

China wants Kamchatka back. Game over komerade.

Taiwan is important to China. China is not with a government that tries to hamper its economic development.

If Russia goes to war, China takes the Kamchatka region back. Taiwan they simply aren't getting.

You are dreaming. There is increasing cooperation and trade between Russia and China - also because of western sanctions.

If war breaks out between Russia and NATO, NATO will ******* hammer Russia, then the Chinese will have virtually no resistance taking Kamchatka and more...

You are thinking in Dollars, not in Power.

"When asked two weeks ago in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee whether the Army was “outranged” by any adversary, U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milley said: “Yes … the ones in Europe, really Russia. We don’t like it, we don’t want it, but yes, technically [we are] outranged, outgunned on the ground.”"

Outnumbered, Outranged, and Outgunned: How Russia Defeats NATO • Drop zone delta

The title of the Article is how Russia defeats NATO, I believe it very well could have said the US. The armies of any one of the countries of the EU are

www.dropzonedelta.com

Look at where your military budget is going to. Expensive bases, carriers, aircraft. Russia can counter them with a fraction of the costs. With highly developed air defense and missiles. Then you are talking about Nato. But you have few real armies in the Nato and the second largest, the Turkish army, might not partake in a war. Thus, there is only the US military, the others are not worth mentioning.

And an idiot like you falls for that misinformation. Mission accomplished, I guess.

Look at that top 10 list again, 7, maybe 8 with India are together. Russia couldn't even take all of Ukraine because their gear broke down. You watch reports watching their tanks moving around at it looks like WWII gear, if that, lol.

And what if your Master says it?

Trump to veterans: U.S. military is depleted

Donald Trump is telling a veterans group that the United States' military is "depleted" and says he will expand the nation's armed forces. Trump made the pledge at a Retired American Warriors conference in Herndon, Virginia on Monday. (Oct. 3)

eu.usatoday.com

Trump has never uttered a single word in his whole life that wasn't a lie. He was justifying spending even more. But you didn't get that apparently.

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

 

[Taz]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

 

[Litwin]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

Putin backed off , as we expected, we won , moscow thugs lost as usual

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine "Russia's defense minister said Thursday that massive military exercises near the border with Ukraine had been completed, and that he had ordered troops to return to their permanent bases by May 1, according to state media."...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Baron]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

Putin backed off , as we expected, we won , moscow thugs lost as usual

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine "Russia's defense minister said Thursday that massive military exercises near the border with Ukraine had been completed, and that he had ordered troops to return to their permanent bases by May 1, according to state media."...

www.usmessageboard.com

As I always said Putin is a cowardly traitor

 

[Litwin]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

Putin backed off , as we expected, we won , moscow thugs lost as usual

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine "Russia's defense minister said Thursday that massive military exercises near the border with Ukraine had been completed, and that he had ordered troops to return to their permanent bases by May 1, according to state media."...

www.usmessageboard.com

As I always said Putin is a cowardly traitor

"Putin is a cowardly traitor"
no, its just reality

 

[Silver Cat]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

Putin backed off , as we expected, we won , moscow thugs lost as usual

Really? Are Crymea and Donbass Ukrainian already?

 

[Bleipriester]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

 

[Taz]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

Brand new stuff, lol. No chance. Look at the military spending. Nearly the whole 9 others are against Russia, add it all up against Russia's $49 billion and it won't even be a fair fight.

 

[Silver Cat]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

They just showed how the movement of troops works. The West can´t even do that. Unlearned. And China won´t be your ally, you are treating it badly.

China wants Kamchatka back. Game over komerade.

Taiwan is important to China. China is not with a government that tries to hamper its economic development.

If Russia goes to war, China takes the Kamchatka region back. Taiwan they simply aren't getting.

You are dreaming. There is increasing cooperation and trade between Russia and China - also because of western sanctions.

Seriously? At $48 billion against $1 trillion? Wake up brah, Russians won't even attack, it would be suicidal.
View attachment 482332

Military Spending by Country 2026

Discover population, economy, health, and more with the most comprehensive global statistics at your fingertips.

worldpopulationreview.com

Is there a difference for a, say, Syrian terrorist, to be bombed by a Russian FAB-500 ($50) or by an American JDAM ($ 30000)?
Russians are much more effective in spending their money.

 

[Taz]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

They just showed how the movement of troops works. The West can´t even do that. Unlearned. And China won´t be your ally, you are treating it badly.

China wants Kamchatka back. Game over komerade.

Taiwan is important to China. China is not with a government that tries to hamper its economic development.

If Russia goes to war, China takes the Kamchatka region back. Taiwan they simply aren't getting.

You are dreaming. There is increasing cooperation and trade between Russia and China - also because of western sanctions.

Seriously? At $48 billion against $1 trillion? Wake up brah, Russians won't even attack, it would be suicidal.
View attachment 482332

Military Spending by Country 2026

Discover population, economy, health, and more with the most comprehensive global statistics at your fingertips.

worldpopulationreview.com

Is there a difference for a, say, Syrian terrorist, to be bombed by a Russian FAB-500 ($50) or by an American JDAM ($ 30000)?
Russians are much more effective in spending their money.

$50 for a bomb? Fireworks cost more than that, lol. I'll go with the DJAM, and drop a whole bunch of them. Some MOABs also!

 

[Silver Cat]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

They just showed how the movement of troops works. The West can´t even do that. Unlearned. And China won´t be your ally, you are treating it badly.

China wants Kamchatka back. Game over komerade.

Taiwan is important to China. China is not with a government that tries to hamper its economic development.

If Russia goes to war, China takes the Kamchatka region back. Taiwan they simply aren't getting.

You are dreaming. There is increasing cooperation and trade between Russia and China - also because of western sanctions.

Seriously? At $48 billion against $1 trillion? Wake up brah, Russians won't even attack, it would be suicidal.
View attachment 482332

Military Spending by Country 2026

Discover population, economy, health, and more with the most comprehensive global statistics at your fingertips.

worldpopulationreview.com

Is there a difference for a, say, Syrian terrorist, to be bombed by a Russian FAB-500 ($50) or by an American JDAM ($ 30000)?
Russians are much more effective in spending their money.

$50 for a bomb? Fireworks cost more than that, lol. I'll go with the DJAM, and drop a whole bunch of them. Some MOABs also!

Its price was roughly $50 when it was produced, now it is near zero, may be even less than zero, because it is cheaper to drop on someone's head, than utilize properly.

 

[Bleipriester]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

Brand new stuff, lol. No chance. Look at the military spending. Nearly the whole 9 others are against Russia, add it all up against Russia's $49 billion and it won't even be a fair fight.
View attachment 485170

What´s all that spending worth when you can´t even get your for years planned exercises "Defender" going? Russia has deployed 150.000 troops to Ukraine´s border and back in a matter of days. West is done. Fat fags, that education is not paying off.

 

[Taz]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

Brand new stuff, lol. No chance. Look at the military spending. Nearly the whole 9 others are against Russia, add it all up against Russia's $49 billion and it won't even be a fair fight.
View attachment 485170

What´s all that spending worth when you can´t even get your for years planned exercises "Defender" going? Russia has deployed 150.000 troops to Ukraine´s border and back in a matter of days. West is done. Fat fags, that education is not paying off.

Ukraine isn't some kind of line in the sand for the West, that's why they wouldn't let them into NATO. If Russia tries that with say, Germany, they will get beaten, and badly.

 

[Silver Cat]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

Brand new stuff, lol. No chance. Look at the military spending. Nearly the whole 9 others are against Russia, add it all up against Russia's $49 billion and it won't even be a fair fight.
View attachment 485170

What´s all that spending worth when you can´t even get your for years planned exercises "Defender" going? Russia has deployed 150.000 troops to Ukraine´s border and back in a matter of days. West is done. Fat fags, that education is not paying off.

Ukraine isn't some kind of line in the sand for the West, that's why they wouldn't let them into NATO. If Russia tries that with say, Germany, they will get beaten, and badly.

Ok. Let's play the game. It's 2022, Poland and Germany without direct order from the USA and without support of other NATO allies send their forces in Belorussia (say, because Lukashenko is killed and Tikhanovskaya invited them). Russia strikes back. German and Polish forces in Belorussia are totally destroyed, Russia continues her offence in Poland. Warsaw (with two Polish and two German brigades) is destroyed by tactical nukes, and Russian forces crossed the German border, threatening Berlin.
Do you really believe, that in such situation Biden-Harris will commit "murder-suicide" rather than find "diplomatic solution", even if this "solution" means de facto occupation of Poland and Germany?

 

[Maskin]

Russia gets crushed if a real war breaks out. China's interests are on the US side in this conflict, they could take back some land...

Who told it?
CNN?
Never trust presstitutes

Russia is actually pretty weak. All their gear is old and not much of it works.

The head of STRATCOM Adm. Charles Richard has another opinion.

Top military official warns China and Russia are modernizing nuclear weapons faster than US

The top US military official who runs the American nuclear arsenal warned that China and Russia are modernizing their nuclear weapons and capabilities faster than the US, saying during a congressional hearing on Tuesday that if it does not start investing more in nuclear defense and...

edition.cnn.com

Is NATO a Viable Military Organization?

Second - we need the Credible First Strike Capability, which depends on our possibility to counter their retaliation strike. (Detterence Type II). We have the ability to target thousands of nukes with deadly accuracy. No need to worry about that No. Ability to target thousands of nukes with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Of course they'll say that not to have their budgets cut. Russia spends $48 billion a year on the military, we're up to $750 billion a year. It wouldn't even be a fair fight.

Putin backed off , as we expected, we won , moscow thugs lost as usual

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine

BREAKING: Moscow announces END to massive troop buildup near Ukraine "Russia's defense minister said Thursday that massive military exercises near the border with Ukraine had been completed, and that he had ordered troops to return to their permanent bases by May 1, according to state media."...

www.usmessageboard.com

As I always said Putin is a cowardly traitor

Putin is a coward.
i'm sure the next "tsar" will be tough.

 

[Maskin]

Spending more like Obama? Like all the others? So. All lie. But you.

I'm just calling it as I see it from facts. You're dreaming of a mighty Russian superpower. Brah, that's a myth.

Russia doesn´t has the economic power the USA has. But, and that is what you are completely ignoring, Russia is the country with all the brand new military stuff exceeding the capabilities of its self-delcraed foes by a multitude.

Brand new stuff, lol. No chance. Look at the military spending. Nearly the whole 9 others are against Russia, add it all up against Russia's $49 billion and it won't even be a fair fight.
View attachment 485170

What´s all that spending worth when you can´t even get your for years planned exercises "Defender" going? Russia has deployed 150.000 troops to Ukraine´s border and back in a matter of days. West is done. Fat fags, that education is not paying off.

Ukraine isn't some kind of line in the sand for the West, that's why they wouldn't let them into NATO. If Russia tries that with say, Germany, they will get beaten, and badly.

Ok. Let's play the game. It's 2022, Poland and Germany without direct order from the USA and without support of other NATO allies send their forces in Belorussia (say, because Lukashenko is killed and Tikhanovskaya invited them). Russia strikes back. German and Polish forces in Belorussia are totally destroyed, Russia continues her offence in Poland. Warsaw (with two Polish and two German brigades) is destroyed by tactical nukes, and Russian forces crossed the German border, threatening Berlin.
Do you really believe, that in such situation Biden-Harris will commit "murder-suicide" rather than find "diplomatic solution", even if this "solution" means de facto occupation of Poland and Germany?

1. Germany will not do anything, since Germany is a US colony. (controlled by the USA)
2. Poland does not know how to fight since the 17th century, they remember 3 sections.
----
3. there will be no war ...

Ukraine will soon go bankrupt, there will be a civil war, as a result, the entire territory will return to Russia
4.Forget about Belarus ..

5. It's very funny to hear about housewife Tikhanovskaya and blogger Navalny as candidates for President.
Can you choose Assange or the USMB admin as the President of America?