Putin declares 30 day ceasefire

You didn't consider that would happen?
It's exactly what I've said before. Those talks are almost meaningless, because neither Ukraine, nor Europe (first of all Germany, France and England) won't fulfill it. Trump doesn't control Europe, and he hardly controls the USA.
 
It's exactly what I've said before. Those talks are almost meaningless, because neither Ukraine, nor Europe (first of all Germany, France and England) won't fulfill it. Trump doesn't control Europe, and he hardly controls the USA.
It's better than fully supporting war.
 
It's better than fully supporting war.
May be good talks and stupid actions is better than both stupid talks and stupid actions simultaneously, but not much. Actually, open enemy may be even more preferable than a stupid ally or an enemy wearing the mask of friendship.
 
It's exactly what I've said before. Those talks are almost meaningless, because neither Ukraine, nor Europe (first of all Germany, France and England) won't fulfill it. Trump doesn't control Europe, and he hardly controls the USA.
You mean like the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, also known as the "Big Treaty"? The treaty recognized the inviolability of existing borders, and respect for territorial integrity and mutual commitment not to use its territory to harm the security of each other.
 
You mean like the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, also known as the "Big Treaty"? The treaty recognized the inviolability of existing borders, and respect for territorial integrity and mutual commitment not to use its territory to harm the security of each other.
Yes. Exactly. What we are doing - we are coercing former Ukraine into fulfilling their obligations according this threaty. We have been respecting territorial integrity of the friendly, or, at least, neutral Ukraine. But it's a road with two-way movement. You don't hurt us, and we don't hurt you. You hurt us, you kill us, you try to join hostile military pact to kill us in much larger numbers, ok, then our hands are free.

And what about NATO-Russia Founding Act, what about numerous treaties between Russia and the USA, what about destruction of the whole system of the world's safety? What about illegal and unprovoked aggressions against Serbia in 1999 and Iraq in 2003? It wasn't Russia, who started destruction of the post-WW2 world's order and NATO expansion.
 
Yes. Exactly. What we are doing - we are coercing former Ukraine into fulfilling their obligations according this threaty. We have been respecting territorial integrity of the friendly, or, at least, neutral Ukraine. But it's a road with two-way movement. You don't hurt us, and we don't hurt you. You hurt us, you kill us, you try to join hostile military pact to kill us in much larger numbers, ok, then our hands are free.

And what about NATO-Russia Founding Act, what about numerous treaties between Russia and the USA, what about destruction of the whole system of the world's safety? What about illegal and unprovoked aggressions against Serbia in 1999 and Iraq in 2003? It wasn't Russia, who started destruction of the post-WW2 world's order and NATO expansion.
Glad you brought up the NATO-Russia Founding Act. It is summarized below, the bold italics are mine. The section that Russia has clearly violated is in bold red italics. What has the US or Europeans violated?

NATO-Russia Founding Act

Fact sheet released by the White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC, May 15, 1997

On May 14, NATO Secretary General Solana and Russian Foreign Minister Primakov announced agreement on the text of the "Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation," creating a new relationship between the Alliance and Russia. The Act has been referred to NATO countries and President Yeltsin for approval.

The Clinton Administration has made building a more stable, secure, and undivided Europe one of its key foreign policy priorities. At the Helsinki summit in March, Presidents Clinton and Yeltsin agreed on the importance of crafting a cooperative relationship between NATO and Russia. The Act provides the basis for an enduring and robust partnership between the Alliance and Russia, one that can make an important contribution to Europe's security architecture in the 21st century.

Under the terms of the Act, NATO and Russia will consult and coordinate regularly and, where possible and appropriate, act jointly--as they are doing in Bosnia now. The Act has five principal sections:

The preamble notes that NATO and Russia do not consider one another adversaries and cites the sweeping transformations in NATO and Russia that make possible this new relationship.

Section I lays out the principles governing the relationship, e.g., restatement of the norms of international conduct in the UN Charter and OSCE Helsinki Final Act and explicit commitments, such as respecting the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of states and settling disputes peacefully.

Section II creates a new forum called the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council for NATO-Russia meetings and describes how this Council will function.

Section III describes a range of issues that NATO and Russia will discuss, including conflict prevention, peacekeeping, prevention of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and exchange of information on security policies and defense forces.

Section IV describes the military dimensions of the relationship. Among the key provisions:

Reiteration by NATO of aspects of its current defense policy and strategy, including the December 1996 statement that it has "no intention, no plan and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members including nuclear weapons storage sites.

Reference to NATO's March 14, 1997 statement that in the current and foreseeable security environment, NATO will carry out its collective defense and other missions through interoperability, integration and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces on the territory of new members.

Recognition that NATO will require adequate infrastructure on new members' territories commensurate with NATO's collective defense and other missions.

Commitment by NATO and Russia to work for prompt adaptation of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty to reflect the changed security environment since CFE was completed in 1990.

Section IV also provides mechanisms to foster closer military-to-military cooperation between NATO and Russian militaries, including by creating military liaison missions in respective NATO and Russian military headquarters.

NATO retains its full prerogatives. While Russia will work closely with NATO, it will not work within NATO. The Act makes clear that Russia has no veto over alliance decisions and NATO retains the right to act independently when it so chooses.

The Act has no impact on NATO enlargement. That process is proceeding on schedule; NATO leaders at the Madrid summit in July will extend invitations to the first countries to begin accession talks. Those countries admitted will have the full rights and responsibilities of Alliance membership, and the door to membership will remain open to all emerging European democracies.
 
Glad you brought up the NATO-Russia Founding Act. It is summarized below, the bold italics are mine. The section that Russia has clearly violated is in bold red italics. What has the US or Europeans violated?
Bold blue italics. They had violated the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Serbia back in 1999.
And then read the full text and try to find out what else what violated. It's not that difficult if you really want to find the answers.
For starters - additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces on the territory of new members.

NATO-Russia Founding Act

Fact sheet released by the White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Washington, DC, May 15, 1997

On May 14, NATO Secretary General Solana and Russian Foreign Minister Primakov announced agreement on the text of the "Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation," creating a new relationship between the Alliance and Russia. The Act has been referred to NATO countries and President Yeltsin for approval.

The Clinton Administration has made building a more stable, secure, and undivided Europe one of its key foreign policy priorities. At the Helsinki summit in March, Presidents Clinton and Yeltsin agreed on the importance of crafting a cooperative relationship between NATO and Russia. The Act provides the basis for an enduring and robust partnership between the Alliance and Russia, one that can make an important contribution to Europe's security architecture in the 21st century.

Under the terms of the Act, NATO and Russia will consult and coordinate regularly and, where possible and appropriate, act jointly--as they are doing in Bosnia now. The Act has five principal sections:

The preamble notes that NATO and Russia do not consider one another adversaries and cites the sweeping transformations in NATO and Russia that make possible this new relationship.

Section I lays out the principles governing the relationship, e.g., restatement of the norms of international conduct in the UN Charter and OSCE Helsinki Final Act and explicit commitments, such as respecting the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of states and settling disputes peacefully.

Section II creates a new forum called the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council for NATO-Russia meetings and describes how this Council will function.

Section III describes a range of issues that NATO and Russia will discuss, including conflict prevention, peacekeeping, prevention of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and exchange of information on security policies and defense forces.

Section IV describes the military dimensions of the relationship. Among the key provisions:

Reiteration by NATO of aspects of its current defense policy and strategy, including the December 1996 statement that it has "no intention, no plan and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members including nuclear weapons storage sites.

Reference to NATO's March 14, 1997 statement that in the current and foreseeable security environment, NATO will carry out its collective defense and other missions through interoperability, integration and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces on the territory of new members.

Recognition that NATO will require adequate infrastructure on new members' territories commensurate with NATO's collective defense and other missions.

Commitment by NATO and Russia to work for prompt adaptation of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty to reflect the changed security environment since CFE was completed in 1990.

Section IV also provides mechanisms to foster closer military-to-military cooperation between NATO and Russian militaries, including by creating military liaison missions in respective NATO and Russian military headquarters.

NATO retains its full prerogatives. While Russia will work closely with NATO, it will not work within NATO. The Act makes clear that Russia has no veto over alliance decisions and NATO retains the right to act independently when it so chooses.

The Act has no impact on NATO enlargement. That process is proceeding on schedule; NATO leaders at the Madrid summit in July will extend invitations to the first countries to begin accession talks. Those countries admitted will have the full rights and responsibilities of Alliance membership, and the door to membership will remain open to all emerging European democracies.
 
Pop the one where Russia was given assurances that NATO wouldn't expand any further.

How'd that work out?
 
Pop the one where Russia was given assurances that NATO wouldn't expand any further.

How'd that work out?
NATO-expansion-document-promise-UK-US-Germany.webp
 
TASS: Most of the AFU mercenaries in Kursk region were from Georgia and Colombia

Most of the AFU mercenaries in Kursk region were Georgians and Colombians. This is reported by TASS with reference to a source in the Russian security services.

“Of the mercenaries were mostly Georgians and Colombians, one of whom was taken prisoner by the fighters of the Russian Armed Forces Group North,” he said.

In addition, the Russian military killed citizens of English- and French-speaking countries on the territory of the Sujan border area.

According to the agency's interlocutor, many corpses can be identified only by DNA, as most Ukrainians were without documents, and the mercenaries, moreover, did not take their documents with them.

Two days earlier it was reported that the AFU brought another batch of Colombian mercenaries to the Glubokoye tract on the border of Sumy region of Ukraine and Kursk region. According to the plan of the Ukrainian command, the mercenaries will have to try to stop the offensive of the Russian army.

It was also repeatedly reported that Georgian militants from the Solidarity group had been liquidated in the region.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom