Although I said exactly the same thing the very day of the attack it does not make it a zero chance. The article say Paul says zero chance that it could have been Assad. Hardly saying there was zero chance Assad did do it.
IF Assad is the bad man that the Obama administration made him out to be, and if the US intelligence reported that it was Assad then I am thinking that although it looks to be stupid, he just might have done so.
I also heard that the gas was delivered by airplane. I seriously doubt that delivering the gas via airplane is an efficient delivery system.
Bottom line, we don't know, you, me or Paul.
thats a good point HOWEVER,considering the lies of the lamestream media have told over the last several DECADES such as the JFK assassination,vietnam,waco,flight 800,ect,ect,ect, and the fact they dont do any REAL investigating,that the BEST work on media reporting is from independent news sources such drudge,american free press, and the corbett report-a man who had to flee america to japan because he had death threats given to him and his family for exposing our governments corruption with news items like this one,dont know what he has said on this even but this is just an example of his reporting." ect,ect as a just a FEW examples,
considering the BEST media reporting is from people like them, and ron paul has come out and told the truth that he would not support Romney because he is the same as Obama,no different whatsoever,the fact ron paul has come out and said what very FEW politicians will ever say the TRUTH that we need to get rid of the CIA,the FBI,and the fed,because they are the reason the world is in the mess it is,I would believe ron paul any day of the year over the LAMESTREAM media and what THEY say.

It appears to me that the media people believe is the media that prints what the person already believes.
Take your first example, JFK. The MSM has reported everything they can about his assignation. I doubt there is not a conspiracy theory out there that has not been reported. I just watched on the TV a theory that an SS agent actually fired, accidentally, the kill shot, from the car behind Kennedy. They produced a lot of evidence that they said supported their conclusion but in so doing they ignored a whole lot more. What I see is spin. Everyone spins things the way they want to see them, you, me and the rest of the subjective world. In or about 1970 I watched a movie about the assignation and at the end they listed those witnesses killed since the assignation and the odds against that happening by chance. I was all fired up. But then one has to realize, there were a whole lot of witnesses left that were not killed, so why kill just a select few that really didn't have any more to add to the story and leave some witnesses that really were telling some damning stories.
A true conspiracy theorist would say it is done just to muddy the waters so the truth will never be told. Meanwhile the only truth they would believe is the truth they already believe without proof. Crazy.
So yeah, I believe a little man with a crappy gun killed a president. Just like a deranged man shot Reagan.
So yeah, I think tall buildings will fall if planes hit them, I SAW IT happen.
Do I believe Assad ordered the use of gas? I think he would be very stupid to do so but maybe he is that stupid.