Pubmed Access Blocked

[badger2]

Badger2 has been denied access to all of Pubmed. This is a good sign for those still capable of doing research in this magnificent database. Pubmed’s reason for denial is apparently “abuse” of the system, and we are pleased to have been able to uncover many contradictions via this database, which now must be left to someone else. We have placed this thread in current events not only because it is current but that this event has the potential for massive media suppression of already published science and its history, which latter we had already begun to see ahistoricism in 2019 at Pubmed. This Pubmed ahistoricism includes eliminating access to earlier connections of a search term: there is no longer a true chronological order in the search results, and the older abstracts may not be abstracts at all. By most anyone’s estimation, this should be defined as the suppression of medical knowledge.

’Sometimes they have to sacrifice one of their own.’
(Deleuze, Philosophy of Crime Novels)

 

[Otis Mayfield]

PubMed is a free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health maintain the database as part of the Entrez system of information retrieval.

How did you get kicked off a "free search engine?"

 

[RodISHI]

badger2 You may have to use IP cloaking.

 

[badger2]

PubMed is a free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health maintain the database as part of the Entrez system of information retrieval.

How did you get kicked off a "free search engine?"

It must have been a bizarre tweakage, because back here at USMB, the URLs were accessible. Nonetheless, anyone who experiences these ”access denied” prompts should report them swiflty. The reasons why include the fact that the arrogant POS commie Chinese haven’t published the first report SARS-CoV-2 in a natural reservoir, yet today we see a world-media report that ebola can stay in the host years after infection, again, no verified natural reservoir. The deadly Nipah virus has a close relative that came out of the same Tongguan copper mine as SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative, RaTG13: henipavirus Tongguan 1. As long as the commies clam up, they can dairy-farm these viruses to their advantage. An ebola-family virus, Mengla, originates not far away from that copper mine in Yunnan, China.

It’s best to assume that there could be land mines placed the closer one gets to the smoking bat-civet.

 

[badger2]

This is a recent event of concern. Where are the reports of ebola vaccine efficacy weakening in these hosts? SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation D614G precisely links to ebola VSV-based vaccine:

20 Sep 2021 Ebola Virus Can Stay in Human Survivors and May Trigger Outbreaks After Years

Ebola Virus Can Stay in Human Survivors and May Trigger Outbreak After Years

It is already general knowledge that the deadly Ebola could lie dormant in survivor's tissues, but a new study suggests that these 'virus reservoirs' are capable of reawakening and triggering an outbreak even 5 years after infection.

www.natureworldnews.com

 

[badger2]

Note that the recent SARS-Cov-2 infection in a Kissimee, Florida, ferret links to the ebola vaccine/SARS-CoV-2 mutation D614G, which increases transmission in hamsters and ferrets. Whether it does so in wild Everglades minks is unknown.