Public money handed to wealthy families

Sherlock Holmes

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2024
Messages
13,698
Reaction score
5,464
Points
208
You simply couldn't make this up. Texas is going to use public money, our tax dollars to subsidize expensive private education.

This is called socialism for the rich and is never objected to by trumpanzees, who hypocritically decry socialism for the poor.

1739378056339.webp


So do you trumpanzees actually approve of this? I thought DOGE was trying to eliminate such waste (well I never really thought that but the dumbass trumpanzees did).
 
Isn't that what government is all about, giving tax payer monies to wealthy individuals? That's what never ending wars are all about. Smedley Butler pointed that out a century ago, noting that "war is a racket".

The Clintons and many others became very rich from public monies. It seems USAID is all about that.
 
You simply couldn't make this up. Texas is going to use public money, our tax dollars to subsidize expensive private education.

This is called socialism for the rich and is never objected to by trumpanzees, who hypocritically decry socialism for the poor.

View attachment 1077725

So do you trumpanzees actually approve of this? I thought DOGE was trying to eliminate such waste (well I never really thought that but the dumbass trumpanzees did).

Rich families are already entitled to free education for their children through the government system. This just gives them a choice on how to access this benefit.
 
It's 10K because most private school tuition are around 20K. They wanted to make sure that it wasn't enough for poorer families to send their kids, but give the better off families, who's kids are already enrolled, a half off special.

Isn't that precious!
 
You simply couldn't make this up. Texas is going to use public money, our tax dollars to subsidize expensive private education.

This is called socialism for the rich and is never objected to by trumpanzees, who hypocritically decry socialism for the poor.

View attachment 1077725

So do you trumpanzees actually approve of this? I thought DOGE was trying to eliminate such waste (well I never really thought that but the dumbass trumpanzees did).
As opposed to the democrat slush fund known as USAID.
 
As opposed to the democrat slush fund known as USAID.
So you're not actually opposed to public money being used as charity for the wealthy, go it. You only care when it's used for the poor.

You're a true republican, eager support of a welfare state for the rich, you are a socialist!

Congratulations.
 
You simply couldn't make this up. Texas is going to use public money, our tax dollars to subsidize expensive private education.

This is called socialism for the rich and is never objected to by trumpanzees, who hypocritically decry socialism for the poor.

View attachment 1077725

So do you trumpanzees actually approve of this? I thought DOGE was trying to eliminate such waste (well I never really thought that but the dumbass trumpanzees did).
Absolutely!! It gives parents the freedom to decide where and how to educate their children
 
Here in Pennsylvania, the governor wants to give Affluent students free meals at school. And he's a lib
 
It's 10K because most private school tuition are around 20K. They wanted to make sure that it wasn't enough for poorer families to send their kids, but give the better off families, who's kids are already enrolled, a half off special.

Isn't that precious!
They gave $10K for private, but state money per pupil given to the public schools is less than $6,500. And only $2,500 for homeschooling. What the heck?
 
Last edited:
So you're not actually opposed to public money being used as charity for the wealthy, go it. You only care when it's used for the poor.

You're a true republican, eager support of a welfare state for the rich, you are a socialist!

Congratulations.
Not what I said at all. But thanks for playin!
 
Confusing information, most of us working people went to or have childern attending now.
How ever we do it, education is critical to all kinds of advancement.
 
So you're not actually opposed to public money being used as charity for the wealthy, go it. You only care when it's used for the poor.

You're a true republican, eager support of a welfare state for the rich, you are a socialist!

Congratulations.
So this is a state subsidy? It will probably affect their state income tax returns.
 
You simply couldn't make this up. Texas is going to use public money, our tax dollars to subsidize expensive private education.

This is called socialism for the rich and is never objected to by trumpanzees, who hypocritically decry socialism for the poor.

View attachment 1077725

So do you trumpanzees actually approve of this? I thought DOGE was trying to eliminate such waste (well I never really thought that but the dumbass trumpanzees did).

Doge is trying to eliminate waste in the federal government, not in the states.
 
15th post
So this is a state subsidy? It will probably affect their state income tax returns.
Texas does not have state income tax.

I would be ok if the payout were the same as state payment to public school. Being more is frankly bullshit.
 
Texas does not have state income tax.

I would be ok if the payout were the same as state payment to public school. Being more is frankly bullshit.
I have to say it sure doesn't look good.
Pretty hard to defend it on the face of it.
I don't know all of the details but what I'm seeing so far doesn't wash.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom