Psuedo Science; It's What Science Was

[skews13]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

.


Cute little post.

Get help before we have to get it for you.





.

 

[Oddball]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you

Democrats owned slaves and FORCED people to work for them. But not one person in a capitalist environment FORCED anyone to work for them. It is a contract between the employer and the employee. Man you really showed your full on retard on that statement....

 

[alang1216]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

Considering that the point was against racism, at least I think that was the point, I'm not really sure, but if that was the point, it was a pretty racist way of getting there. Excuse me while I go scratch my head.

 

[MarathonMike]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

I'm still waiting for you to post ONE THING that makes sense. So far you are 0 for 8,840.

 

[1srelluc]

LOL.....OP might be onto something given his ilk's spokesperson for all things science.

 

[Natural Citizen]

This guy nails it...

 

[BackAgain]

White supremacist Americans - which is to say all Americans at that time - accepted that being able to force others, through slavery or capitalism, to work for you while you take advantage of your situation and skim off the wealth and leisure - that is the superior thing to do. And, since a lot of white people do that, being white must be superior. That is how Social Darwinists must argue. A rational human would wonder what's wrong with white people and if there's something beyond how they are raised, that makes them such assholes. A scientist would notice that, no, there isn't: being a wealthy powerful asshole is virtually entirely a matter of your starting condition not your breeding.

Another problem with the whole "breeding" thing is that Social Darwinists have to resolutely ignore the fact that there are a lot of princes that knocked up the chamber-maid and that child did not exhibit any monarchial disposition, and that there have been plenty of nobility who may think they spawned their heir but in fact it was the captain of the house-guard who did the nasty with the princess when her chinless, drooling, 60 year-old husband by arranged marriage was face-down drunk somewhere. There is a point to all of this, which is that modern understanding of group inheritance completely explodes Social Darwinism; only a jackass would believe in white supremacy, and many of them do.

Pseudoscience: It’s What Science Was

Learn why Madison Grant’s debunked race theories still affect society today—see how junk science became influential policy.

www.dailykos.com

Do you work hard to be an idiot or has it always come all too naturally for you?