In the presidential debate Chris Wallace implied that Proud Boys are white supremacists. Of course, we all know that does not make any sense given they vote for president Trump, while white nationalists are Biden voters.
Looking it up, I can't see anything that this group has done wrong. Defending oneself from antifa terrorists is a heroic act worthy of a medal, nothing to do with white supremacy. Being proud of the best humanity has ever created - likewise I can see nothing wrong in this.
Can anyone find an item of significance they have done wrong? When is Biden going to condemn Antifa and stop kneeling for BLM?
One only need look at their arrest records to see what they've done wrong, or the weaponry they carry to their "rallies". They are a right wing domestic terrorist group, who like stomping on people. Basically they're thugs, who dress up their their thuggery as "patriotism".
But after reading up on them I found out what Biden and MSM said is a lie, they denounce White Supremacy and claim not to be white supremicist and the actual beef was only that they had ties or members who might have been (but even that was selective recognition and tainted by the source And fake news spin). Antifa has members who are former skin heads, so isn't that deflecting?
When radicals kvetch and moan about a political rival as radical it's not exactly a valid point as 2 negatives = a positive. It's like hearing Saddam called the US the great Satan=a compliment coming from such an adversary.
Militants against a commie coup is not a bad thing, it would be like Meduro's men kvetching against those who rose up against socialist totalitarianist Meduro who refused to accept the election and people's wishes to go back to democracy.
Furthermore do you really want to go by arrests?
Are Meduro's prisoners a revealing factor?
Like arresting the St Louis Couple is that a factor, all it shows is the fascist arresting them abused their power and used politics not law.
So you accept what they "say", without looking into what they "do". The Proud Boys deny they're white supremacists, but their actions after Charlottesville were really "rebranding" and changes in marketing strategies, rather than repudiation of the white supremacist values.
They denounce "white supremacy" on paper, but support white supremacist ideals including "white only immigration", banning Muslims and other non-Christians, and other goals of the toxic males only white supremacist subculture, calling them "Western European values". Kind of like how the Republican Party has denied the racism at the core of the party, while decrying "urban" crime, social problems as not being due to systemic racism and poverty, and instead blame the inner city "thugs", and lazy, drug addicted "welfare queens" for the problems.
Those whose goals, aims and tactics are so odious and despicable that they cannot tell you honestly and directly what they are doing because you would be repulsed by what they would really mean, frequently hire marketing and public relations firms to teach them how to cover their sliminess with a shield of inoffensive language, which their supporters recognize as calls to the cause. Dog whistles.
The Proud Boys are basically a group of white thugs who get their jollies beating people up, and calling themselves defenders of "Western European Values". It sounds so innocent and patriotic until you read the definition of "Western European Values" and discover they are basically white supremacist values with the references to race removed, and replaced with references to "western European culture" or "western European values". They are proud of their "Western Culture" and want to defend it against "socialism" and "communism" hence they are "Proud Boys".
They want people to respect and fear them when they walk down the street with their brass nuckles and AR15's, and paramilitary gear. Their targets for beatings and abuse are liberals, socialists, and "commies", preferably liberal protestors, because they have the best opportuity to be able to beat up unarmed liberal protestors. They're easy targets, they can claim self defence or protecting property, but mostly because there is less likelihood that they'll be arrested if they do, or convicted using self defence.
They can claim they were attacked first and just fought back (Charlottesville), but with few of the militias getting hurt or requiring hospitalization, that story doesn't hold up. Also, the level of deaths and injuries being visited upon the protestors, and those suffered by the Proud Boys where ever they go, show what a piece of fiction that one is.
The FBI has classed the Proud Boys as a "radical right wing, terrorist" group. I believe the FBI and the police reports of their activities over what these criminals are posting on their website.