Proof the SCOTUS decided against the founders intent

[Truthmatters]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

Hey stupid, SCOTUS concluded that corporations were in fact people.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

There was no 'the press' back then. The freedom of the press referred to the right of all people to print what they wished. You know, pamphlets and stuff.

 

[Truthmatters]

And that was against the founders intent LL taintlicker.

 

[Truthmatters]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

There was no 'the press' back then. The freedom of the press referred to the right of all people to print what they wished. You know, pamphlets and stuff.

Yes there was a PRESS back then.

 

[Truthmatters]

Benjamin Franklin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


remember what this guy did for a living back then?

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Nothing like what we see today

 

[Truthmatters]

Dude its best to admitt when you are wrong and move on.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

And that was against the founders intent LL taintlicker.

Prove it.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Yes, you should.

 

[Truthmatters]

And that was against the founders intent LL taintlicker.

Prove it.

did you read the original post fool

 

[Truthmatters]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

what do you disagree with?

 

[Vel]

So since you don't think corporations are people, then you must agree that we shouldn't be able to sue a corporation either right?

 

[Sherry]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

Did you make this one all up on your own??

 

[☭proletarian☭]

So since you don't think corporations are people, then you must agree that we shouldn't be able to sue a corporation either right?

Suing the company is effectively suing the people who comprise it.

Kinda like talking about 'the GOP' is talking about the people who comprise the body which they call the GOP.

 

[Vel]

So since you don't think corporations are people, then you must agree that we shouldn't be able to sue a corporation either right?

Suing the company is effectively suing the people who comprise it.

Kinda like talking about 'the GOP' is talking about the people who comprise the body which they call the GOP.

Really.. kind of like advertising done by the company is done by the people who comprise it? Yeah.. That's what I thought.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

And that was against the founders intent LL taintlicker.

Prove it.

did you read the original post fool

I'm not a fool dickweed but yes I read the OP. And it doesn't prove the founders were against corporations donating to political causes. So my challenge still stands.

 

[driveby]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

Wow, the IQ of you and Joy Behar put together is almost equal to a rubber eraser......

 

[Yurt]

i seriously can't believe how stupid this thread is

 

[beowolfe]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is all anyone needs to realise they did not intend corporations to have special rights to have their right to speech defended.

The founders singled out ONE industry for obvious reasons.

They could have said all corporations in all fields if that was the intenet.

They did not.

they mentioned ONLY one industry.

Freedom of the press was the only exception to Human Beings they intended.

There was no 'the press' back then. The freedom of the press referred to the right of all people to print what they wished. You know, pamphlets and stuff.

Another example of the right just making chit up.

Pages from America's Past