Proof Obama Lied in Debate

[poet]

Oh, and then there is this:
Jonathan Karl: I 'Regret' Inaccuracies In Benghazi Reporting

Here's one in your face:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/294699-obama-flubs-skewer-liberalism.html#post7257275

A link? To your own post? As proof?

 

[midcan5]

Someone may have already posted this, I don't have time to read through the hatred of the right for our democratically elected president.

'Obama Called Benghazi Attack an Act of Terror the Next Day, Sept 12'

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ILstYEZfus]Obama Called Benghazi Attack an Act of Terror the Next Day, Sept 12 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[PoliticalChic]

Someone may have already posted this, I don't have time to read through the hatred of the right for our democratically elected president.

'Obama Called Benghazi Attack an Act of Terror the Next Day, Sept 12'

Obama Called Benghazi Attack an Act of Terror the Next Day, Sept 12 - YouTube

Here....let me help you to understand the sleight-of-hand by the democratically elected liar-in-chief:


2. "Notice the subtle change from 'the Benghazi attack was an act of terror....'
to the more general 'No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,..." which is what he actually said. Full Transcript of Obama's Rose Garden Speech After Sept. 11 Benghazi Attack - October 16 12 10:31 EDT - ForexTV.com

a. And- this generalization was after he said this:
"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None."

An obvious reference to the pretend-provenance of the attack: the video.
There is no other way these four sentences make sense."


It was meant to persuade the less astute.....

....raise your paw.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh, and then there is this:
Jonathan Karl: I 'Regret' Inaccuracies In Benghazi Reporting

Here's one in your face:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/294699-obama-flubs-skewer-liberalism.html#post7257275

A link? To your own post? As proof?

Hope you didn't read it....

...hate to ruin your day.

 

[P@triot]

He called it an act of terror every day after it, morons.

It is down right frightening how much you support an administration that you are completely and totally ignorant of. You have no idea what transpires in this administration, but you pledge an undying allegiance to it anyway.

Here are the FACTS:

On September 11, 2012 ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was brutally murdered in a planned, terrorist attack.

The Administration knew this as the attack was occurring.

However, they immediately lied to the American people and blamed a YouTube video (how interesting that of all the things they could blame, they chose to place the blame on FREEDOM OF SPEECH and the INTERNET - two things they have made clear they desperately want control over... Make no mistake - that was not a coincidence - it was a well planned "let no good crisis go to waste" moment).

Two weeks later, before Congress, the Administration was STILL supporting the official narrative that it was a spontaneous result of a YouTube video.

 

[poet]

Here's one in your face:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/294699-obama-flubs-skewer-liberalism.html#post7257275

A link? To your own post? As proof?

Hope you didn't read it....

...hate to ruin your day.

Hunty, I only read posts and links posted by those of the right and left who are not on my ignore list.
FYI: a link to your own post (read : opinion) is not proof of anything, and certainly not to be confused or mistaken for "truth".

 

[poet]

He called it an act of terror every day after it, morons.

It is down right frightening how much you support an administration that you are completely and totally ignorant of. You have no idea what transpires in this administration, but you pledge an undying allegiance to it anyway.

Here are the FACTS:

On September 11, 2012 ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was brutally murdered in a planned, terrorist attack.

The Administration knew this as the attack was occurring.

However, they immediately lied to the American people and blamed a YouTube video (how interesting that of all the things they could blame, they chose to place the blame on FREEDOM OF SPEECH and the INTERNET - two things they have made clear they desperately want control over... Make no mistake - that was not a coincidence - it was a well planned "let no good crisis go to waste" moment).

Two weeks later, before Congress, the Administration was STILL supporting the official narrative that it was a spontaneous result of a YouTube video.

Uh, the Libyan Embassy was also a cover for the CIA, which was conducting a covert 'Op", which Ambassador Stevens, no doubt, was aware of....all exacerbated by a video "trashing" the Prophet Mohammad, which the right denies had anything to do with the terrorist attack on the Embassy, despite the fact that the violence started in Cairo, and was shown on Arabic tv.
How can you know or say that the video had no part in precipitating and escalating the violence? You can't.