Project veritas uncovers the Deep state in the state department

[Vastator]

There goes the "single" theory. I cannot however attest to the extent of any of the related parties inebriation...
As Promised; Project Veritas Exposes Additional Saboteurs Within The Government...

Alright, 2 out of 3 or 4 million...not really a trend yet!

You didn’t think he was going to drop them all at once did you? Besides... It really only takes a few if theyre in the right positions...

Are either of these two in the position to do anything other than talk shit?

Sure. What the video. They say it plain.

They talk a lot of trash, but both seem to be pretty low level flunkies.

Who also make clear that they aren’t alone... first it was just “one”... The place is packed with Obama era appointees.

 

[Vastator]

Here's a List of All the U.S. Govt's Rogue Twitter Accounts Fighting Trump's Crackdown on Science - Core77

Good too see people using their own freedoms to stand up to him. They are all unofficial accounts and the people who have them have every right to do so.

Plus, Trump is about as anti-science as they come. Science scares him as he is not smart enough to understand it.

Any justification for this assessment? Or is it just a drive by douche bagging? Most leftists and liberals deny the sciences of genetics, heredity, sociology, and intelligence. But I don’t hear you making a stink about that...

 

[AceRothstein]

MUH DEEP STATE!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Here's a List of All the U.S. Govt's Rogue Twitter Accounts Fighting Trump's Crackdown on Science - Core77

Good too see people using their own freedoms to stand up to him. They are all unofficial accounts and the people who have them have every right to do so.

Plus, Trump is about as anti-science as they come. Science scares him as he is not smart enough to understand it.

Any justification for this assessment? Or is it just a drive by douche bagging? Most leftists and liberals deny the sciences of genetics, heredity, sociology, and intelligence. But I don’t hear you making a stink about that...

Can you give a few examples?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Vastator]

Here's a List of All the U.S. Govt's Rogue Twitter Accounts Fighting Trump's Crackdown on Science - Core77

Good too see people using their own freedoms to stand up to him. They are all unofficial accounts and the people who have them have every right to do so.

Plus, Trump is about as anti-science as they come. Science scares him as he is not smart enough to understand it.

Any justification for this assessment? Or is it just a drive by douche bagging? Most leftists and liberals deny the sciences of genetics, heredity, sociology, and intelligence. But I don’t hear you making a stink about that...

Can you give a few examples?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Sure. After you answer mine...

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

 

[Lovebears65]

you beat me to it

 

[martybegan]

And other investigative media doesn't try to frame their own narratives?

Methinks this is another case of "It's only OK when we do it" by progressives.

Project Veritas has been caught staging their own scandals that they then capture on video. They have no credibility. Does that mean their target is innocent? Who knows? Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. As is always the case with Project Veritas and their friends who pull similar stunts, we don’t know based solely on their highly edited and crafted exposes.

So just ignore it because what they find ruins your own narrative.

Got it.

I don’t purport to be a journalist. But I am highly selective of the journalists I trust. Sources like O’Keefe, Loomer, Huffington, gatewaypundit, dailykos, et al., are untrustworthy and have established themselves as such. Only fools accept their brand of journalism because they know such “journalists” will deliver the message they want to hear.

Or maybe you read or watch with the knowledge of the sources bias, and maybe shifty methods of getting the information or getting it out.

There is nothing wrong with being partisan or producing propaganda, the problem comes when it is misrepresented as "neutral, fair, balanced" etc.

Nothing wrong with taking sides, plenty wrong with claiming you have not taken a side.

And that is what the MSM doesn't get about people's mistrust of it.

We’re not talking about bias or propaganda; we’re talking about a source with shot credibility. Project Veritas destroyed their own credibility with the very tactics they employ. That is where they pretend to break laws and then attempt to catch others they can lure on camera to follow their lead. But then edit out anything which shows folks are actually doing their job lawfully and responsibly. Like they did when they tried to setup the Washington Post with a fake accusation of sexual assault against Roy Moore; only the Post didn’t fall for the ruse and identified Project Veritas as the culprit. Or like when their comrades at CMP tried that same stunt of releasing highly edited videos to setup Planned Parenthood to make it appear like they were illegally selling embryonic tissue for profit. But when the truth emerged, it turned out their sales were legal and not profitable above their costs.

"Profitable above costs" is a weasel way out of not admitting selling fetus parts.

Investigative journalism can be messy. It's amazing how butt hurt progs get when it is used against them to show bad behavior.

Attack the messenger, ignore the message.

 

[martybegan]

So just ignore it because what they find ruins your own narrative.

Got it.

OKeefe has no credibility
He is propaganda

All you can do is say......he might be right this time

One can say the same thing for plenty of Left wing investigators and talk shows.

Of course he is propaganda, has he ever stated otherwise?

LOLOL

You admit he’s propaganda yet here you are, seeking validation for his latest piece of work.

Is Last Week Tonight with John Oliver propaganda or not?

Propaganda is not an automatic negative, any political ad put out by a party can be considered propaganda.

Not. John Oliver is a comedian with an entertainment show. He doesn’t portray himself as a journalist or an investigator or the news. Comedy is satire and not intended to be taken seriously.

Yes, it is. He is the perfect example of "clown nose on, clown nose off". Attacks people who's politics he doesn't like but then tries to hide behind being a "comedian" when called out on it.

It's a pussy way out, but I figure people like you admire that.

 

[rightwinger]

What has the Deep State done to bring down the Trump Presidency?

 

[martybegan]

What has the Deep State done to bring down the Trump Presidency?

Doing, not done.


It's simply bureaucrats with a stake in Dems being in control (bigger government means more power for them) doing anything they can to slow Trump down, via leaks, via not following through on directives, and things like that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Restist at any cost and they dont care because they are federal employee and even boast that he cant be fired. EXPOSE these socialist

lol

Moronic thread premise.

There is no "deep state."

 

[Faun]

Project Veritas has been caught staging their own scandals that they then capture on video. They have no credibility. Does that mean their target is innocent? Who knows? Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. As is always the case with Project Veritas and their friends who pull similar stunts, we don’t know based solely on their highly edited and crafted exposes.

So just ignore it because what they find ruins your own narrative.

Got it.

I don’t purport to be a journalist. But I am highly selective of the journalists I trust. Sources like O’Keefe, Loomer, Huffington, gatewaypundit, dailykos, et al., are untrustworthy and have established themselves as such. Only fools accept their brand of journalism because they know such “journalists” will deliver the message they want to hear.

Or maybe you read or watch with the knowledge of the sources bias, and maybe shifty methods of getting the information or getting it out.

There is nothing wrong with being partisan or producing propaganda, the problem comes when it is misrepresented as "neutral, fair, balanced" etc.

Nothing wrong with taking sides, plenty wrong with claiming you have not taken a side.

And that is what the MSM doesn't get about people's mistrust of it.

We’re not talking about bias or propaganda; we’re talking about a source with shot credibility. Project Veritas destroyed their own credibility with the very tactics they employ. That is where they pretend to break laws and then attempt to catch others they can lure on camera to follow their lead. But then edit out anything which shows folks are actually doing their job lawfully and responsibly. Like they did when they tried to setup the Washington Post with a fake accusation of sexual assault against Roy Moore; only the Post didn’t fall for the ruse and identified Project Veritas as the culprit. Or like when their comrades at CMP tried that same stunt of releasing highly edited videos to setup Planned Parenthood to make it appear like they were illegally selling embryonic tissue for profit. But when the truth emerged, it turned out their sales were legal and not profitable above their costs.

"Profitable above costs" is a weasel way out of not admitting selling fetus parts.

Investigative journalism can be messy. It's amazing how butt hurt progs get when it is used against them to show bad behavior.

Attack the messenger, ignore the message.

Bullshit. There’s no reason Planned Parenthood has to incur the costs for other companies to perform research with embryonic tissue. The samples are available and Planned Parenthood provides them for suitable corporations. And it’s not just Planned Parenthood saying this, it’s the law. The law allows businesses to charge a nominal fee to cover the costs of providing fetal tissue.

And what’s wrong with attacking a sleazy outfit like Project Veritas? They’re mission is to set folks up by appearing to commit a crime themselves; and then surgically edit responses to make it appear as though others are going along with their crimes. Why would anybody offer any consideration for such deceptive methods? The police can’t even do that to catch real criminals.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Restist at any cost and they dont care because they are federal employee and even boast that he cant be fired. EXPOSE these socialist

lol

Moronic thread premise.

There is no "deep state."

C_Clayton_Jones, post: 2081

Moronic thread premise.

There is no "deep state."[/QUOTE]



boy you sure showed him.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

A single drunk bragging moron. Yep, that is proof!

This is just part one.More to come

you mean the brainwashed sheep like Clayton and IMT? i agree.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I can't believe folks want to deny this is the truth, when folks in these agencies ADMITTED this is the truth. wtf?

AMEN TO THAT,great video.LOL

 

[martybegan]

So just ignore it because what they find ruins your own narrative.

Got it.

I don’t purport to be a journalist. But I am highly selective of the journalists I trust. Sources like O’Keefe, Loomer, Huffington, gatewaypundit, dailykos, et al., are untrustworthy and have established themselves as such. Only fools accept their brand of journalism because they know such “journalists” will deliver the message they want to hear.

Or maybe you read or watch with the knowledge of the sources bias, and maybe shifty methods of getting the information or getting it out.

There is nothing wrong with being partisan or producing propaganda, the problem comes when it is misrepresented as "neutral, fair, balanced" etc.

Nothing wrong with taking sides, plenty wrong with claiming you have not taken a side.

And that is what the MSM doesn't get about people's mistrust of it.

We’re not talking about bias or propaganda; we’re talking about a source with shot credibility. Project Veritas destroyed their own credibility with the very tactics they employ. That is where they pretend to break laws and then attempt to catch others they can lure on camera to follow their lead. But then edit out anything which shows folks are actually doing their job lawfully and responsibly. Like they did when they tried to setup the Washington Post with a fake accusation of sexual assault against Roy Moore; only the Post didn’t fall for the ruse and identified Project Veritas as the culprit. Or like when their comrades at CMP tried that same stunt of releasing highly edited videos to setup Planned Parenthood to make it appear like they were illegally selling embryonic tissue for profit. But when the truth emerged, it turned out their sales were legal and not profitable above their costs.

"Profitable above costs" is a weasel way out of not admitting selling fetus parts.

Investigative journalism can be messy. It's amazing how butt hurt progs get when it is used against them to show bad behavior.

Attack the messenger, ignore the message.

Bullshit. There’s no reason Planned Parenthood has to incur the costs for other companies to perform research with embryonic tissue. The samples are available and Planned Parenthood provides them for suitable corporations. And it’s not just Planned Parenthood saying this, it’s the law. The law allows businesses to charge a nominal fee to cover the costs of providing fetal tissue.

And what’s wrong with attacking a sleazy outfit like Project Veritas? They’re mission is to set folks up by appearing to commit a crime themselves; and then surgically edit responses to make it appear as though others are going along with their crimes. Why would anybody offer any consideration for such deceptive methods? The police can’t even do that to catch real criminals.

And that "nominal fee" can always have a bit of profit built into it. It's the same thing done with overhead in billable hours.

You only think they are sleazy because they attack things you like. Do the same thing to conservatives and you would probably have your dick out at full mast.

 

[Faun]

I don’t purport to be a journalist. But I am highly selective of the journalists I trust. Sources like O’Keefe, Loomer, Huffington, gatewaypundit, dailykos, et al., are untrustworthy and have established themselves as such. Only fools accept their brand of journalism because they know such “journalists” will deliver the message they want to hear.

Or maybe you read or watch with the knowledge of the sources bias, and maybe shifty methods of getting the information or getting it out.

There is nothing wrong with being partisan or producing propaganda, the problem comes when it is misrepresented as "neutral, fair, balanced" etc.

Nothing wrong with taking sides, plenty wrong with claiming you have not taken a side.

And that is what the MSM doesn't get about people's mistrust of it.

We’re not talking about bias or propaganda; we’re talking about a source with shot credibility. Project Veritas destroyed their own credibility with the very tactics they employ. That is where they pretend to break laws and then attempt to catch others they can lure on camera to follow their lead. But then edit out anything which shows folks are actually doing their job lawfully and responsibly. Like they did when they tried to setup the Washington Post with a fake accusation of sexual assault against Roy Moore; only the Post didn’t fall for the ruse and identified Project Veritas as the culprit. Or like when their comrades at CMP tried that same stunt of releasing highly edited videos to setup Planned Parenthood to make it appear like they were illegally selling embryonic tissue for profit. But when the truth emerged, it turned out their sales were legal and not profitable above their costs.

"Profitable above costs" is a weasel way out of not admitting selling fetus parts.

Investigative journalism can be messy. It's amazing how butt hurt progs get when it is used against them to show bad behavior.

Attack the messenger, ignore the message.

Bullshit. There’s no reason Planned Parenthood has to incur the costs for other companies to perform research with embryonic tissue. The samples are available and Planned Parenthood provides them for suitable corporations. And it’s not just Planned Parenthood saying this, it’s the law. The law allows businesses to charge a nominal fee to cover the costs of providing fetal tissue.

And what’s wrong with attacking a sleazy outfit like Project Veritas? They’re mission is to set folks up by appearing to commit a crime themselves; and then surgically edit responses to make it appear as though others are going along with their crimes. Why would anybody offer any consideration for such deceptive methods? The police can’t even do that to catch real criminals.

And that "nominal fee" can always have a bit of profit built into it. It's the same thing done with overhead in billable hours.

You only think they are sleazy because they attack things you like. Do the same thing to conservatives and you would probably have your dick out at full mast.

They can, but they don’t.

Wrong.

 

[martybegan]

Or maybe you read or watch with the knowledge of the sources bias, and maybe shifty methods of getting the information or getting it out.

There is nothing wrong with being partisan or producing propaganda, the problem comes when it is misrepresented as "neutral, fair, balanced" etc.

Nothing wrong with taking sides, plenty wrong with claiming you have not taken a side.

And that is what the MSM doesn't get about people's mistrust of it.

We’re not talking about bias or propaganda; we’re talking about a source with shot credibility. Project Veritas destroyed their own credibility with the very tactics they employ. That is where they pretend to break laws and then attempt to catch others they can lure on camera to follow their lead. But then edit out anything which shows folks are actually doing their job lawfully and responsibly. Like they did when they tried to setup the Washington Post with a fake accusation of sexual assault against Roy Moore; only the Post didn’t fall for the ruse and identified Project Veritas as the culprit. Or like when their comrades at CMP tried that same stunt of releasing highly edited videos to setup Planned Parenthood to make it appear like they were illegally selling embryonic tissue for profit. But when the truth emerged, it turned out their sales were legal and not profitable above their costs.

"Profitable above costs" is a weasel way out of not admitting selling fetus parts.

Investigative journalism can be messy. It's amazing how butt hurt progs get when it is used against them to show bad behavior.

Attack the messenger, ignore the message.

Bullshit. There’s no reason Planned Parenthood has to incur the costs for other companies to perform research with embryonic tissue. The samples are available and Planned Parenthood provides them for suitable corporations. And it’s not just Planned Parenthood saying this, it’s the law. The law allows businesses to charge a nominal fee to cover the costs of providing fetal tissue.

And what’s wrong with attacking a sleazy outfit like Project Veritas? They’re mission is to set folks up by appearing to commit a crime themselves; and then surgically edit responses to make it appear as though others are going along with their crimes. Why would anybody offer any consideration for such deceptive methods? The police can’t even do that to catch real criminals.

And that "nominal fee" can always have a bit of profit built into it. It's the same thing done with overhead in billable hours.

You only think they are sleazy because they attack things you like. Do the same thing to conservatives and you would probably have your dick out at full mast.

They can, but they don’t.

Wrong.

Yeah, right.

Right.

 

[rightwinger]

What has the Deep State done to bring down the Trump Presidency?

Doing, not done.


It's simply bureaucrats with a stake in Dems being in control (bigger government means more power for them) doing anything they can to slow Trump down, via leaks, via not following through on directives, and things like that.

Well then, give some examples of what they are doing

Given the amount of Deep State rhetoric, there must be plenty of examples of things the government employees have done to undermine Trump