Progressives want us to show our children porn

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
53,854
52,757
3,605

I hear yet another Progressive state that parents should watch porn with their children with the reasoning that they will do it anyway.

WTH?

Next will it be having sex with your children because they will do that anyhow as well?


John Hickenlooper , the Far Left Colorado governor, watches pornography with his mum.

I think its a lot more common than most people realize.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
It's the kind of understanding that only you and Bill Clinton and his buddy Epstein can understand.

Hardly. She said she would watch it with them "one time" (did you miss that part) to help them to understand how unrealistic it is.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.

Actually, I understand perfectly, and that's why i recognize the idea as sick. Contrary to this broad's idea, most people aren't going to pop in a bestiality DVD when they visit their mum.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
It's the kind of understanding that only you and Bill Clinton and his buddy Epstein can understand.

Hardly. She said she would watch it with them "one time" (did you miss that part) to help them to understand how unrealistic it is.
I see, so does she give them heroin one time to show them how unrealistic that is as well?
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.

Actually, I understand perfectly, and that's why i recognize the idea as sick. Contrary to this broad's idea, most people aren't going to pop in a bestiality DVD when they visit their mum.

When someone just makes things up as you just did one realizes they no longer have a valid argument.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
It's the kind of understanding that only you and Bill Clinton and his buddy Epstein can understand.

Hardly. She said she would watch it with them "one time" (did you miss that part) to help them to understand how unrealistic it is.
I see, so does she give them heroin one time to show them how unrealistic that is as well?

No but she most certainly could take them to see what happens to people who do.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
It's the kind of understanding that only you and Bill Clinton and his buddy Epstein can understand.

Hardly. She said she would watch it with them "one time" (did you miss that part) to help them to understand how unrealistic it is.
I see, so does she give them heroin one time to show them how unrealistic that is as well?

No but she most certainly could take them to see what happens to people who do.
Porn can be just as addictive as heroin idiot.
 
She made sense........but I don't expect many to understand.
It's the kind of understanding that only you and Bill Clinton and his buddy Epstein can understand.

Hardly. She said she would watch it with them "one time" (did you miss that part) to help them to understand how unrealistic it is.
I see, so does she give them heroin one time to show them how unrealistic that is as well?

No but she most certainly could take them to see what happens to people who do.
Porn can be just as addictive as heroin idiot.

It can be. So can food. Are you suggesting she not feed them or rather help them to understand the proper diet?
 
Its crazy that liberals object to Gone with the Fucking Wind, but think that viewing the latest offering from Seka or John C. Holmes is appropriate for people to view with their parents.
Apparently, they don't find porn offensive but when confronted at the sight of a confederate flag, want to hide their children under a rock.

Very telling
 
It can be. So can food. Are you suggesting she not feed them or rather help them to understand the proper diet?

So for you, porn is as vital as food? You think parents have a duty to provide porn to their children?

Is something you say you would watch with your kids one time to explain to them how unrealistic it is saying it's vital? No, of course not. This is little more than a Pavlovian response out of you and others. If not you could be honest about what she said.
 
I hear yet another Progressive state that parents should watch porn with their children


W-why not, Vot? I mean, can you name one thing the democratic party has done in recent years that wasn't already obscene and pornographic?

I mean, first they want boys and girls, men and children to share the same locker rooms and bathrooms, then they say they are all for gay rights and trans rights, then they put the Boy Scouts out of business for allegedly having a few gays in their ranks who unbeknownst to them preyed on boys, then say they want children playing with dildos in school and putting rubbers on pickles, to now having the right at age 7 to decide if they really want to be a boy or a girl or something else!

Let's pass out the issues of Hustler to all the Kindergartners and get this ball on the road!


hellyeah.jpg
 
It can be. So can food. Are you suggesting she not feed them or rather help them to understand the proper diet?

So for you, porn is as vital as food? You think parents have a duty to provide porn to their children?

Is something you say you would watch with your kids one time to explain to them how unrealistic it is saying it's vital? No, of course not. This is little more than a Pavlovian response out of you and others. If not you could be honest about what she said.

Liberalism is an unrealistic ideology, they come up with stupid, unrealistic plans like O'care just like in porn where they get unrealistic ideas like a film pornographers made about a gal having relations with 2000 people in honor of the turning of the millennium. Conservatives realize both ideas are unrealistic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top